On Nov 30, 2008, at 10:50 PM, Niels Bakker wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick W. Gilmore) [Mon 01 Dec 2008, 02:34 CET]:
On Nov 28, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Jean-François Mezei wrote:
The advantage of this swedish data centre is that even if its
location is well known, it is pretty hard to harm the b
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick W. Gilmore) [Mon 01 Dec 2008, 02:34 CET]:
On Nov 28, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Jean-François Mezei wrote:
The advantage of this swedish data centre is that even if its location
is well known, it is pretty hard to harm the building. You can't run a
truck full of explosives i
>
>Fault free datacenters include neither people, nor computers, nor
>connectivity, nor HVAC, nor electricity. If you can eliminate those
>things you will have a 100% uptime datacenter.
>
>Andrew
Is this the network equivalent of Yin and Yang, or Darkness and Light
being the same?
Perhaps it is
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> On Nov 28, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Jean-François Mezei wrote:
>
>> The thing about a carrier hotel is that it cannot be a secret location
>> since you need to allow various carriers and ISPs to have physical
>> access to the building so they can install/manage their
>> servers
On Nov 28, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Jean-François Mezei wrote:
The thing about a carrier hotel is that it cannot be a secret location
since you need to allow various carriers and ISPs to have physical
access to the building so they can install/manage their
servers/routers/switches.
The advantage of th
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 16:19 -0500, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> At one point some time ago, on NANOG we discussed putting exchanges in old
> minuteman silos. (so long ago a quick Google didn't find it -- where are all
> the old NANOG archives?)
>
http://markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Aedu.meri
6 matches
Mail list logo
