RE: peeringdb admin contact?

They always respond very quickly anytime I email them you sure there isn't any spam filters etc. playing nasty on you? ;) -Original Message- From: matthew zeier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: October 13, 2008 3:53 PM To: NANOG Subject: peeringdb admin contact? Been trying to get some

Re: peeringdb admin contact?

Hi! Been trying to get someone from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get back to me but haven't had any luck. Anyone? If you have someone responding. we have created accounts there for a couple of our customers, but still are read only level. Not really handu if you ask people on peeringforum.eu to joi

Re: peeringdb admin contact?

On Oct 13, 2008, at 3:52 PM, matthew zeier wrote: Been trying to get someone from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get back to me but haven't had any luck. Anyone? [EMAIL PROTECTED] The e-mail address is on the front page of , you don't even have to log in to see it. Tha

peeringdb admin contact?

Been trying to get someone from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get back to me but haven't had any luck. Anyone?

Re: NANOG 44 and ARIN XXII - Live from Los Angeles in HD video

Oh, forgot one thing. Please don't bother playing the streams on-site. :) -Tk

NANOG 44 and ARIN XXII - Live from Los Angeles in HD video

We've got a simple HDV (1440x1088 p29.976) camera setup aimed at the speaker podium area. It only has front stage video, no presenter slides. For a more "full presentation experience" check out the Quicktime/Winmedia streams at http://nanog.org/streaming.php The following streams will carry both

Study on Minium Route Advertisement Interval ..

Hi, I am studying the MRAI timer and its effects on BGP - how it affects the overall BGP convergence, route flap damping, persistent oscillations, etc. It is wrt this that i would like to know the default setting that most service providers use? Do they use the default value as provider by their

Re: Hostexploit report/Intercage/Esthost

On Monday 13 October 2008 15:30:07 Konstantin Poltev wrote: > > and Spamhaus itself claims not to be > subject to any US laws, where it clearly does business. The Spamhaus website lists addresses in the UK and Switzerland. They appear to operate from the UK, and they claim to be subject to UK l

RE: Help needed - Cisco Netflow

"Lee, Steven (NSG Malaysia)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 10/10/2008 01:20:30 PM: > Does anyone aware of the sampled netflow accuracy? If you mean how well you can extrapolate "real" numbers from "samples" by multiplying by the inverse sample rate, my (initial and somewhat limited) testing sho

Hostexploit report/Intercage/Esthost

Hello, My name is Konstantin Poltev and I'm with Esthost. I'd like to ask you to read through this email before hastily replying. As you are probably aware, Esthost has been accused of pretty much every mortal sin - from cybercrime to being KGB-sponsored part of Russian Business Network in

Re: IPv6 Wow

On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Stephen Sprunk wrote: Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: This brings up an interesting question, should we stop announcing our 6to4 relays outside of Europe? Is there consensus in the business how this should be done? I have heard opinions both ways. I can understand why some

Re: IPv6 Wow

On 13/10/2008, at 7:18 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Nathan Ward wrote: 6to4 is enabled by default in Vista - any Vista machine with a non- RFC1918 address will use 6to4. It is also available in some linksys routers, and is enabled by default in Apple Airport Extreme.

Re: IPv6 Wow

On Mon, 13 Oct 2008, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: On Sun, 12 Oct 2008, Daniel Senie wrote: I do wonder whether where the Vista machines on public IPs really are. I also have to wonder if performance is really better when those users are routed over 6to4 in Europe from, say California, or whether