Hi,
Yes I do have link between two sites so I will configure routing accordingly
so communication between two sites will follow that link...
regards
Devang Patel
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 10:25 PM, Jay Hennigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> devang patel wrote:
>
> So if I will have the globally u
ascii art:
( Internet =)
| |
192.0.2.10 192.0.2.10
| |
AS-0AS-0
| |
256.0.0.0 256.0.0.0
works a treat (as Joe Abley mentions as well).
--bill
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 09:55:19PM -0500, deva
devang patel wrote:
So if I will have the globally unique IP addresses for both the site which
are located at different location then its perfectly fine to use the same as
number in for same organisation having two different site located at
different location...right!!!
Right.
But as others h
Hi,
So if I will have the globally unique IP addresses for both the site which
are located at different location then its perfectly fine to use the same as
number in for same organisation having two different site located at
different location...right!!!
regards
Devang Patel
On Sat, May 24, 2008
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> any news of the presentation surfacing anywhere? interested to details of
> what was discussed
yeah. where's the beef?*
*not that I don't think said beef exists.
any news of the presentation surfacing anywhere? interested to details of
what was discussed
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Gadi Evron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2008, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>
>> Dragos Ruiu wrote:
>>
>> First of all about prevention, I'm not at all sure about th
If I may be so bold as to summarize a few posts:
It's ok to let spammers and other criminals use your systems (e.g.,
compute clouds) to slam others just so long as you get yourself into
the various blacklists.
But I thought (routed) bandwidth was the ISP's stock in trade? And
trust (e.g.,
On Sun, 18 May 2008, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Dragos Ruiu wrote:
First of all about prevention, I'm not at all sure about this being
covered by existing router security planning / BCP.
I don't believe most operators reflash their routers periodically, nor
check existing images (particularly because
On 24 May 2008, at 00:08, devang patel wrote:
Is that okay to use Same AS number for the two different site on
different
location?
From the perspective of the rest of the Internet, it will be
indistinguishable from a topologically-distributed AS with interior
connectivity, with a differ
On 24/05/2008 21:36 Barry Shein wrote:
Anyhow, it's not my problem to get them paid, it's my problem when
they're aiding and abetting criminals who harm me and my business.
Well, all I know is that they deliberately leave the compute cloud
ranges in blacklists. I don't really like the idea of
10 matches
Mail list logo
