sure it is. the magical anycast, used by many for DNS service delivery
oes exactly this.
--bill
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 07:15:52PM -0500, devang patel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is that okay to use Same AS number for the two different site on different
> location?
>
> regards
> Devang Patel
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Barry Shein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Even when someone declines a charge it doesn't mean you can't collect
> what you believe to be money legitimately owed you. You can hand it to
> a collection agency if it's worthwhile. If not (e.g., you took a card
> w/o any
Patrick,
Your usage is quite consistent with the RFC 1930 guidelines on the use of
AS, which probably does need some updating but does have an operational
rather than a protocol theory viewpoint.
Specifically, an AS is defined not as a business entity, not as a routing
domain, but as:
"...a
On May 24, 2008 at 12:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Seth Mattinen) wrote:
>
> And 6 months later, a chargeback shows up because the cardholder claims
> their card was used fraudulently. The bank will most likely side with
> the cardholder if you challenge it. How can that loophole be closed?
Since
Barry Shein wrote:
> not to excuse this, but... it's not a simple problem. The 'bad guy'
> rolls up to the website, orders 200 machines for 20 mins under the
> name 'xplosiveman' pays with some paypal/CC and runs his/her job. That
> job happens to create a bunch of email outbound. It could be
> not to excuse this, but... it's not a simple problem. The 'bad guy'
> rolls up to the website, orders 200 machines for 20 mins under the
> name 'xplosiveman' pays with some paypal/CC and runs his/her job. That
> job happens to create a bunch of email outbound. It could be a
> legitimate ema
Gadi,
I read it. As it happens, about a year ago I plowed through a bunch of
Information Operations (formerly known as Information Warfare) papers in
a then-linkable bibliography on the subject. Your GJIA paper is of that
genre. There wasn't enough for me to distinguish between an ad insert
c
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Kee Hinckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 24, 2008, at 3:24 AM, Colin Alston wrote:
>>
>> You should not accept SMTP from the Amazon EC2 cloud at all. Amazon don't
>> intend for anyone to use it as an email platform and tell their clients to
>> use an extern
thanks all. MT seems to have fixed it.
randy
apologies for operational content.
pfs and i are debugging access to/from the afnog class network in rabat.
the net is 196.200.216.0/21.
for example
route-views.oregon-ix.net>traceroute 196.200.216.102
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 196.200.216.102
1 vl-51.uonet1-gw.uoreg
On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 17:02 +0200, Peter Dambier wrote:
> I dont trust it:
Quite right too, it's a spear-phishing attack. This is currently an
almost daily occurrence for .edu domains.
The compromised accounts are frequently abused via webmail systems,
being used to send out more scams.
The scam
On May 24, 2008, at 3:24 AM, Colin Alston wrote:
You should not accept SMTP from the Amazon EC2 cloud at all. Amazon
don't intend for anyone to use it as an email platform and tell
their clients to use an external relay.
I'm sure this is good advice. But if an ISP used that as an excuse for
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Peter Dambier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I dont trust it:
>
> yahoo address, not nanog.
>
> Passwords asked ???
Of course, they're 'upgrating' the accounts :).
> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ari Constancio
On May 24, 2008, at 9:15 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On May 23, 2008, at 8:15 PM, devang patel wrote:
Is that okay to use Same AS number for the two different site on
different
location?
To answer this specific question, Autonomous Systems should be
topologically convex.
This means, at th
I dont trust it:
yahoo address, not nanog.
Passwords asked ???
Kind regrards
Peter
Original Message
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Flags: 1000
Delivered-To: GMX delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 May 2008 09:21:30 -
Received: from
On Sat, May 24, 2008, Randy Bush wrote:
> i am greatly amused by all the poor country hicks so worried about
> having to go to the big scary city. when arriving, sweet virginia,
> please be sure to scrape that right off your shoes.
Meh. I'm from the most remote pretend-city in the western world
On May 23, 2008, at 8:15 PM, devang patel wrote:
Hello,
Is that okay to use Same AS number for the two different site on
different
location?
To answer this specific question, Autonomous Systems should be
topologically convex.
This means, at the Internet interdomain routing (BGP) level,
(I'm sending from a non text-only system at the moment, sorry.)
These should help on the merging part.
[1]http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_4/ip_route/configuration/guid
e/hbgpdas.html
[2]http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122s/122
snwft/release/122
Hi Devang,
a good start point is the Internet Routing Architecture book:
http://www.ciscopress.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=157870233X
Regards,
Diogo
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:15 PM, devang patel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is that okay to use Same AS number for the two different
i am greatly amused by all the poor country hicks so worried about
having to go to the big scary city. when arriving, sweet virginia,
please be sure to scrape that right off your shoes.
randy
On 24/05/2008 02:42 Steve Atkins wrote:
If you're seeing something more egregious than just deluges of spam
then [EMAIL PROTECTED] would likely be the right people
to talk to.
They've been contacted about it and, AIUI, state that the spam being sent
from there is not something they're going to t
21 matches
Mail list logo
