Top posting due to lengthy email...
In my experience from the last year on Alcatel (several years on E and M
Juniper before that) you couldn't be more wrong. As far as looking at the
config, I back them up to a UNIX box nightly. ":1,$ s/exit//"
Not one of the support guys has ever mentione
On Wed May 14, 2008 at 04:31:57PM -0400, Jake Matthews wrote:
> Apparently Charter is going to packetsniff its users and use that for
> commercial purposes.
> Anyones thoughts on this?
There's a company called Phorm (www.phorm.com) trying to do this in the UK,
running some trials with some of t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Regulation could address this, a differentiated service could address
> this, but this smacks of paying for a service to then get additional ads
> sent to you. (like everytime you dialed a number into your Skype for
> Pizza Delivery, they sent you to their paid-Pizza
I think that a TV station cannot just digitally insert an ad into copyrighted
material, as it would be considered a derivative work. .. they have approval
and pay to do that.
I wonder what the legal implications for a web page would be, I would almost
assume they would be the same.
-Patrick
> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r20461817-HSI-Charter-to-monitor-surfing-insert-its-own-targeted-ads
>
This is definitely taking the position that its "their" pipe and not the
*Internet*. I can only imagine the issues that will get wrangled around
in the courts over this. (ahem, Google, ahe
I have been using the 7750/7450 in a couple of my production environments.
I have to say this: AMAZING. I have had very little problems with these
machines. Their support has been amazing. I would recommend these machines
to anyone. Beware of the price though. You def. get what you pay for wit
Something Jon Devree and I were thinking about: How would they handle
cookies the size of 1 MB or larger? Scary as it sounds, looks like a simple
DOS attack waiting to happen :\
JOhn Menerick
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Jake Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
> >
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Nicolas Antoniello
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I agree with you, may be I didn't explain myself clear: I meant "neutral"
> in the sense
> of relation with each other (i.e. Not being hostile).
hopefully we're all big boys and girls and can identify a strong
o
Majdi S. Abbas wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 04:31:57PM -0400, Jake Matthews wrote:
>
>> Apparently Charter is going to packetsniff its users and use that for
>> commercial purposes.
>>
>
> I think you'd find they'd run pretty far afoul of 18 USC 2511
> for that, without prior con
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 04:31:57PM -0400, Jake Matthews wrote:
> Apparently Charter is going to packetsniff its users and use that for
> commercial purposes.
I think you'd find they'd run pretty far afoul of 18 USC 2511
for that, without prior consent (18 USC 2511 2) (c)).
I look
In same spirit, something worst I think ...
If you are in some airport with a GSM/Wifi phone, you are going to
receive a mail, from local Wifi provider to explain you how to reach
his (local wifi) network.
Tested in Roissy / France, with iPhone. iPhone will switch from edge
to wifi connection
Apparently Charter is going to packetsniff its users and use that for
commercial purposes.
Looks like the only way to somewhat opt out is by getting a cookie set
at the below link - which is not only a dumb idea, but still - not even
https.
http://connect.charter.com/cas/portal/settings/privacy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just a quick note,
The thrice annual nanog pgp key signing party will be making an
appearance at NANOG 43.
The keysigning sessions are going to be during the morning breaks during
the general session, and will be location TDB.
Monday June 2
Ok, I agree with you, may be I didn't explain myself clear: I meant "neutral"
in the sense
of relation with each other (i.e. Not being hostile).
Nic.
Tim Sanderson wrote:
> Why be neutral? If something is better, then it is better. Whenever I have
> tried a vendor other than Cisco for a routin
Why be neutral? If something is better, then it is better. Whenever I have
tried a vendor other than Cisco for a routing or switching solution, I
regretted it. Now I use Cisco equipment exclusively except where they do not
make that product I need [such as FatPipe MPVPN].
Tim
-Original Mes
I think we should keep this list as much neutral as we may regarding individual
preferences.
Why some of you keep writing offensive mails to those who write neutral ones or
to those
who know less than what you THINK you know.
Have you heard about: "All we are ignorants, the thing is that we ig
On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Dan Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What about Alcatel's MPLS edge routers like the 7x50 products that
> came from Timetra...anyone have any experience with them? Are they a
> good product?
Garbage, the 7750/7450 are complete junk boxes. Here is why...
- For
Hello everyone,
The NANOG Mailing List Committee is a group of individuals from the
NANOG community who collectively are responsible for ensuring the
functioning of the NANOG mailing list as an effective resource for the
operations community.
The Steering Committee would like to hear from peop
By the way, to add some IPv6 technical noise:
Have you ever tried to set up MD5 auth. in a BGP over IPv6 session between an
Alcatel
7750SR and a Cisco 6500... I keep getting a log message (Cisco) exposing some
issue with
the MD5 digest from the Alcatel.
The funny thing is that Cisco <---> Cisc
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Felix Bako <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guyz, anyone from linkedin please contact me off list as we have not
> been able to open the website www.linkedin.com for sometime now!!
Hi, have you tried to curb 419 spam sent over http/https from your IP
space (through
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Tim Franklin wrote:
>
> On Fri, October 12, 2007 2:49 pm, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
>
>> "HOST x.x.x.x ON YOUR NETWORK PINGED ME I TAKE MY SECURITY
>> SERIOUSLY!! I'M CALLING THE FBI!!!"
>
> That I can *sort* of understand - it's the flaming zealotry of "ALL ICMP
> IS
> Hopefully... ;-)
Not likely! This is a motley crew of people who like to jabber,
not a forum for your favorite vendor's customer support.
> I want to be able to carry IPv6 in a VPRN without having to
> pay an order of magnitude more for an IOM.
May I suggest that you will make much more im
Hi,
I've just changed my IP/MPLS bakcbone with Alcatel ESSs and SRs. Where can I
check on the SR 7750 the version of the IOM, to see if I have the IOM2 by any
chance?
Thanks.
Regards, Oriana
De: Kevin Billings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: mer. 14.05.2008
23 matches
Mail list logo
