EBD> Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 04:02:49 + (GMT)
EBD> From: Edward B. DREGER
EBD> Exponential problems need linear solutions.
U that should read:
Exponential problems need logarithmic solutions.
(Activate... brain... before... engaging... fingers...)
Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http:
RB> Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 05:00:32 +0200
RB> From: Randy Bush
RB> i suggest we focus on how to roll out v6
Bingo. Or, I begin to wonder if door #2 might actually have merit:
RB> or give up and get massive natting to work well (yuchhh!)
For massive NATting to work well, one would need to spec
Hi,
On May 9, 2008, at 9:02 PM, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
> Talk of IPv6 space hoarding and fragmentation. Ughh. Perhaps we can
> avoid repeating IPv4 mistakes with IPv6.
Would be nice, but alas, it seems we're doomed to repeat most past
mistakes.
> Let each allocation be long
> enough to cont
Talk of IPv6 space hoarding and fragmentation. Ughh. Perhaps we can
avoid repeating IPv4 mistakes with IPv6.
Exponential problems need linear solutions.
The method for handing out blocks is flawed. There's no need for linear
stride-N allocations, assuming that a highly-sparse array is acceptab
All,
What do you know about "Akrino, Inc." My guess is going to be
absolutely nothing since the network seems to be owned by a shill
offshore corporation (as does it's upstream "Anders Business Group,"
see also http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS44571 ).
I'm genuinely interested an
anybody no of any issues at 11:00 PST?
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
__
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For historical data, please see http://thyme.apnic.net.
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If anyone cluefull at Yahoo SOC regarding BGP peering on the West Coast
is out there I'd appreciate an email. Normal escalation of a latency
issue between you and one of your peers used for return traffic to my
network simply isn't working.
___
NANO
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Let's think smaller. /16 shall we say?
>
> Like the /16 here. Originally the SRI / ARPANET SF Bay Packet Radio
> network that started back in 1977. Now controlled by a shell company
> belonging to a shell company belonging to a "high volume email
> deployer" :)
>
Hi,
Can someone from Cachefly contact me off-list please?
Cheers,
Babak
___
NANOG mailing list
NANOG@nanog.org
http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
This report has been generated at Fri May 9 21:14:45 2008 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 07-Apr-08 -to- 08-May-08 (32 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS2.0
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS9498 117200 1.1% 97.3 -- BBIL-AP BHARTI BT INTERNET LTD.
2 - AS958389594 0
12 matches
Mail list logo