Re: [NANOG] Comcast latency

2008-05-01 Thread Mike Fedyk
> -Original Message- > From: John Osmon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Another time, I had a VOIP conversation fall apart once with > somone on a > Comcast link. When the jitter finally fell into a reasonable > range, the call sounded *great* again -- but there was a 4 > second latency t

Re: [NANOG] attempt to capture nominet board

2008-05-01 Thread Graeme Fowler
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 19:30 +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > if you are a nomintet voting member or know someone who is, i strongly > encourage you to read these two documents, Results are that of the two new board members, one was a candidate campaigning for change within the organisation (Randy used o

Re: [NANOG] Comcast latency

2008-05-01 Thread James Michael Keller
Tim Thompson wrote: > On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:43:46 -0500 mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Has anyone else noticed a significant increase in latency within >> Comcast's network? >> > > Here, in New England, I normally see 20% packet loss between Comcast and > Level3 in NewYork using MTR

Re: [NANOG] Comcast latency

2008-05-01 Thread Tim Thompson
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:43:46 -0500 mack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone else noticed a significant increase in latency within > Comcast's network? Here, in New England, I normally see 20% packet loss between Comcast and Level3 in NewYork using MTR. It has been as high as 60% in the past s