On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Patrick Giagnocavo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sean Donelan wrote:
>
>
> > Awesome, so could anyone buy a copy of the same images? Which satellite
> > do you think happened to be taking images of the area with these ships
> near the time the cables were broken
Sean Donelan wrote:
Awesome, so could anyone buy a copy of the same images? Which satellite
do you think happened to be taking images of the area with these ships
near the time the cables were broken? Which company is selling that set
of images?
Wouldn't it be reasonable that, when the br
Deepak Jain wrote:
There is no reason to assume these are civilian satellites. Any one of a
number of affected or interested countries could have provided the
imagery (or ship information) to Reliance. Its not saying *who* analyzed
the images. ;)
Then again, how are ship's captains suppose
We used Ookla's solution on our network, they charged a one time fee to add
our logo, etc.. it was not expensive:
http://www.unwiredltd.com/speedtest.php
Peter Kranz
Founder/CEO - Unwired Ltd
www.UnwiredLtd.com
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile: 510-207-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Messag
Daniel Senie wrote:
If you go to Speakeasy.net and run their test, the vendor of theirs has
a logo showing (and clickable). This outfit produces nice-looking speed
test software.
That said, it just reported my Comcast Business account as getting
25Mbps down, and 1.4Mbps up, which is pretty
Doug Clements wrote:
We tell our customers to make sure to use the test site on our
network, which will be quite a bit more accurate than some random
location on the internet they might pick.
There's no reason it can't be reasonably accurate, if you care to
address it. We normally get within a
6 matches
Mail list logo
