On 21/10/2007, at 7:22 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007, Nathan Ward wrote:
Blocking 25/TCP is acceptable, blocking 587/TCP is not - it is
designed for mail submission to an MSA, so serves little use for
spam, save when a spammer has detected an open mail relay listening
on 587/TCP,
On 21/10/2007, at 9:12 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I'm seeing an increasing variety of misguided SPAM blocking
techniques such
that they are starting to become more and more annoying, and, I'm
curious as
to what solutions/work-arounds others have deployed, and, if anyone
has any
ideas on ho
I'm seeing an increasing variety of misguided SPAM blocking
techniques such
that they are starting to become more and more annoying, and, I'm
curious as
to what solutions/work-arounds others have deployed, and, if anyone
has any
ideas on how to get these tactics reduced/stopped?
Here's th
In a message written on Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 07:12:35PM -0500, Joe Greco wrote:
> > In a message written on Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 03:21:09PM -0400, Joe Provo wr=
> > ote:
> > > Content is irrelevent. BT is a protocol-person's dream and an ISP
> > > nightmare. The bulk of the slim profit margin exis
On Sat, 2007-10-20 at 18:01 -0400, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> Sorry for the OT post, but it has been 6 years since Abha passed.
>
> I'm sure there's lots more to say, but I don' think I can say it.
>
> Rest in peace, Abha. You know how much we miss you.
I never met Abha, but I did read the me
On 20/10/2007, at 1:24 PM, Mike Lewinski wrote:
Simon Lyall wrote:
Sounds like the real problem is that your authotative and caching DNS
servers are mixed up.
Understood. I've worked to turn off recursion to the world and made
it through that without too much pain (except for the people w
In a message written on Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 03:21:09PM -0400, Joe Provo wrote:
> Content is irrelevent. BT is a protocol-person's dream and an ISP
> nightmare. The bulk of the slim profit margin exists in taking
> advantage of stat-mux oversubscription. BT blows that out of the
> water.
I'm a
In a message written on Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 01:23:17PM -0400, [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
> The fun is trying to prove you in fact nailed *every* reference. Notice
> the mention today of an Ubuntu box that had different results for adding
> a route and binding an IP to an interface. Obviously, it'
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Joe Abley wrote:
> I've had a few responses like this, but I don't buy it. I've worked
> in many places, some in New Zealand and more elsewhere, where there
> was a general culture of fear about making public statements about
> operational incidents. I don't ever remember peop
>There is enough info in that posting to bury them in frivilous lawsuits.
I say good for them then! Society is litigious enough without our engineers
worrying about lawsuits. The moment you start tempering your true analysis
of a situation to kow-tow to spin doctors is the moment your engineerin
First, that's not what I learned in my law classes.
Second, the "rent" has conditions (they may not publish them, but that
is entirely different matter which I likely agree with you on).
Comcast is under no obligation to let you misuse their service...
morally, ethically, or philosophically.
Thi
On 10/20/07, Jared Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Seems there is a lot of people interested in this within the
> operator community. Since some have developed patches, and other
> ideas, I've created a new mailing list
>
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/240-e
>
>
Seems there is a lot of people interested in this within the
operator community. Since some have developed patches, and other
ideas, I've created a new mailing list
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/240-e
Information on how to subscribe, post, etc.. is located
the
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I cannot access relevant pages on www.comcast.com due to me not being in
the US (or rather, they require an address first), could anyone please
paste or other way supply the wording/text they use in their fineprint,
to allow them contractually to disrupt customer TCP
14 matches
Mail list logo
