On 10/16/07, Justin M. Streiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The effort someone would spend figuring out if 204/4 is reachable and
> > not-pain-inducing in their infrastructure is better spent figuring out how
> > to
> > make IPv6 work within their sphere of responsibilities.
> I agree. The cu
At 02:29 PM 10/16/2007, Pekka Savola wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007, Alain Durand wrote:
Classifying it as private use should come with the health warning "use this
at your own risk, this stuff can blow up your network". In other words, this
is for experimental use only.
Do we need to classify
2 matches
Mail list logo
