On 12/10/2007, at 9:43 AM, Tony Hain wrote:
Nathan Ward wrote:
On 6/10/2007, at 3:18 AM, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
Given the above, I think there is no myth.. !
That's because the 'v6 network' is broken enough that putting
records on sites that need to be well reachable is a bad idea.
F
Tony Hain wrote:
Nathan Ward wrote:
That's because the 'v6 network' is broken enough that putting
records on sites that need to be well reachable is a bad idea.
So why didn't you put up a 6to4 router and put records in that pointed
to the 6to4 prefix for those servers?
That would
Nathan Ward wrote:
> On 6/10/2007, at 3:18 AM, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
> >
> > Given the above, I think there is no myth.. !
>
> That's because the 'v6 network' is broken enough that putting
> records on sites that need to be well reachable is a bad idea.
>
> For example, due mainly to Vista
if you are coming to ABQ and would like to help me out on a
small project, please drop me a line BEFORE you leave.
--bill
4 matches
Mail list logo
