On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, micky coughes wrote:
I can see that *everybody* is missing the point on Peter's exercise.
Clearly this is to show to the telcos of the world that you can upgrade to a
native IP infrastructure and absorb the existing transport into the router
with a minimal effort. There was
Randy Bush wrote:
you're not going to find any 40GB capable CPE now or in the
foreseeable future that's going to be affordable for the residence.
i would agree if we had not once said that about a few meg per sec.
If we continue along orders of magnitude, sure it's foreseeable.
* 30 ye
On 7/12/07, Robert Blayzor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know the intention of the article was to demonstrate the technological
advantage of fiber optic networking vs. other technologies, but to mask
the article around something that seems to indicate that "40GB to the
home" is somehow the cu
On Jul 12, 2007, at 9:06 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote:
I know the intention of the article was to demonstrate the
technological advantage of fiber optic networking vs. other
technologies, but to mask the article around something that seems
to indicate that "40GB to the home" is somehow the c
> you're not going to find any 40GB capable CPE now or in the
> foreseeable future that's going to be affordable for the residence.
i would agree if we had not once said that about a few meg per sec.
randy
Joel Jaeggli wrote:
How practical is it really also that you need CRS-1 at the residence for
this. I agree with Sean. Since for most people the line card alone
costs more than the house. :-)
40Gb/s per slot routers are not that rare at this point. So the notion
that you need a crs-1 in order
Robert Blayzor wrote:
> How practical is it really also that you need CRS-1 at the residence for
> this. I agree with Sean. Since for most people the line card alone
> costs more than the house. :-)
40Gb/s per slot routers are not that rare at this point. So the notion
that you need a crs-1 in
David Meyer wrote:
OTOH, if I announce PI space, "switching to the new path"
is controlled by the announcement/withdrawal of the PI
prefix, and can happen much closer to the source. So in
this sense aggregation breaks a certain kind of "path
selection". I
I've been thinking about a benefit of PI addressing that
I have not seen discussed on this list or others (at
least recently). In particular, PI addressing enables a
certain kind of "path selection" that might not be easy
(or possibly desirable) to retain i
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I have to disagree, considering the amount of people I've had to convice
that this really is a single 50GHz wave using 40G per second over DWDM
system designed for 10G and that it was router
"LC - optical amplification - LC"
Well yes, the technology is quite cool,
> I have to disagree, considering the amount of people I've had to convice
> that this really is a single 50GHz wave using 40G per second over DWDM
> system designed for 10G and that it was router
which is, i believe, the point of the publicity stunt. unfortunately,
it does not help with us need
On 7/12/07, Brandon Butterworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't residential fiber be
> expected to radiate out from neighborhood break-out boxes, or at the
> longest from a central office in the middle of town, rather than having
> some central point where enough individual strands of fib
On Jul 12, 2007, at 6:30 PM, Robert Blayzor wrote:
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
It's a demonstration of backbone technology, not really access
technology.
It's not even that. We all know that 40G technology exists today,
this article doesn't prove anything.
On the contrary, I think that
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Robert Blayzor wrote:
It's not even that. We all know that 40G technology exists today, this
article doesn't prove anything.
I have to disagree, considering the amount of people I've had to convice
that this really is a single 50GHz wave using 40G per second over DWDM
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
Wouldn't residential fiber be
expected to radiate out from neighborhood break-out boxes, or at the
longest from a central office in the middle of town, rather than having
some central point where enough individual strands of fiber converged to
serv
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
It's a demonstration of backbone technology, not really access technology.
It's not even that. We all know that 40G technology exists today, this
article doesn't prove anything. How about they fling their magic wand
some more and show us where 40G to the residenti
This might border OT but I'm going crazy trying to get this IPSEC up
between these two boxes (both in NA so maybe it is OT). If anyone has
done so, drop me a line?
FYI
Regards,
Jordi
-- Mensaje reenviado
De: "Ernest Byaruhanga (AfriNIC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organización: AfriNIC - http://www.afrinic.net
Responder a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:24:02 +0400
Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMA
18 matches
Mail list logo
