-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm not sure that 198.32.0.0/16 was ever advertised. EP.NET runs a
registry for exchange points and other people that Bill feels like
helping out and assigns from that number range; since the /16 covers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- -- Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm not sure that 198.32.0.0/16 was ever advertised. EP.NET runs a
registry for exchange points and other people that Bill feels like
helping out and assigns from that number range; since the /16 covers
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 06:35:15PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
>
>
> On 12-May-2007, at 06:34, Fergie wrote:
>
> >Just as a follow-up to this:
> >
> >The situation still exists: 198.32.0.0/16 is still missing in
> >action in the routing system, and more importantly, so are
> >EP.net's DNS servers.
On 12-May-2007, at 06:34, Fergie wrote:
Just as a follow-up to this:
The situation still exists: 198.32.0.0/16 is still missing in
action in the routing system, and more importantly, so are
EP.net's DNS servers. :-(
I'm not sure that 198.32.0.0/16 was ever advertised. EP.NET runs a
regist
>> I was hoping that there would be someplace like abuse.net where we
>> could register our IPs and ASN, so non-NANOGers could know to
>> contact network-abuse@ when they think our network is attacking them?
That would be nice, wouldn't it? There's two reasons I don't do that.
One is that un
On May 12, 2007, at 8:57 PM, K K wrote:
On 5/11/07, william(at)elan.net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2007, John Levine wrote:
>> The issue I see with most of the options (abuse.net, spamcop,
etc) is
>
> Hey, leave abuse.net out of this, please. It's just a database
of con
6 matches
Mail list logo
