>
> I would imagine that if we're talking about "unsophisticated" users,
> the majority of them have no idea what IRC is anyway -- most of them
> are using AIM, or Yahoo! IM, or
>
Quite true. I do know of a small fraction, however, that when Yahoo
stopped supporting the chats for th
But as George mentions... Sh*t happens There are things you can't
forsee, or maybe spend way too much engineering to overcome that 1
in a million "oops". I've been at Telehouse 25B a few times when
the "I never expected something like that would happen" happened.
(I remember two guys with VER
> www.1800gotjunk.com. They're all over Canada and the US (at the very
> least). It's a very successful franchise operation.
>
> I don't know why they need an AS, but I can say they did a bang-up
> job of hauling the detritus out of a condo I used to own after the
> renter abandoned it.
>
> If they can be avoided, why do we put up with them? Do we really
> want our colo in downtown San Francisco bad enough to take the risk
> of having a single point of failure? How can we, as engineers, ask
> questions about how many generators, how much fuel, and yet take
> for granted that ther
>
>
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> >
> >>
> >> Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> >> > Down is there isn't power to it until it gets repaired. So its not
> >> > answering period. A "nslookup" shows "t
Background:
We MX for a domain, and turn it right around
to Yahoo! Mail. I know others have run into this
before. Because a fair amount of it is spam,
Yahoo stops accepting the mail, yadda yadda yadda.
Problem:
I jumped through all the hoops, and they
tell me I'm denied. When I
>
>
> On 10/29/07, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Unfortunately, we cannot provide you with
> > specific information other than to suggest a review
> > of the questionnaire we supplied and try to determine
> > wh
>
> On 10/29/07, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/29/07, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Unfortunately, we cannot provide you wi
>
>
> On Oct 29, 2007 11:01 PM, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > "Fix your forwarding a lot better". Not sure what this
> > means. My machines are MX's for the clients domain. They
> > accept it, and either forward
>
> Doesn't sound like sabotage to me. In fact, it sounds like bad luck.
>
Will this now be termed "Anchor fade" in the future?
Tuc
> The other side of this besides the delayed receiving of messages is
> with monitoring you want to get the alerts even if your network is down
> and unable to send via email to your pager, cellphone, etc. Having an
> out of band method to get those alerts out on criticial alerts is
> para
Hi,
I seem to be having a problem. Limelight has SWIP'd
69.28.185.0/24 to me, and I asked for IN-ADDR.ARPA control.
I recently went to check and it seemed not to be working
right. I sent them an email around 11p Eastern Sunday nite
asking it to be fixed. I even included a reference to a
Hi all,
(And especially to those emailing privately, Joe Abley
and Adam Rothschild... I never disappeared... ;) )
Yes, I've misspoke. Bad on me #1. You can subdomain
IN-ADDR.ARPA. I understand that if you do more than just simply
put NS records in, it can be done.
The i
>
> I have a very special voice mailbox assigned to a fictional person. Any
> sales calls get transferred to it. No, I don't monitor it. :-)
>
Yes, he works here too... Devlin Nuhl Good old Dev Nuhl.
There are things he is responsible for that even I can't handle.
14 matches
Mail list logo
