"c johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> what are the primary functions of a csu / dsu?
http://www.tscnet.com/faq/internet/internetfaq006.html
---rob
Simon Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri May 03, 2002 at 10:30:05PM +0200, Andre Chapuis wrote:
> > What IOS are you using /31s with ?
>
> Typically 12.0(x)S on GSR and VXR (where x is 10ish upwards)
Not all 12.1(x)y does this properly, even if it was compiled over a
year after that
Scott Granados <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> No I think your message illustrates things pretty well. I guess the
> fundimental differenc here is not only does it cost usually very little
> to receive these messages it costs even less infact dramatically to send
> spam. It seems there is no
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It does not cost "very little" to recieve spam.
>
> It costs the end-user very little to recieve spam.
I'll echo Paul's comments about the cost of my time. In my case, a
half hour a day seems about right (compared to Paul's hour a day). I
suspect you may have
Ralph Doncaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been registering my routes in ARIN's RR, only to find that nobody
> uses it. ;-(
> Do any of the RRs mirrored by the RADB offer free maintainer-IDs?
www.altdb.net / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the usual drill.
Mikael Abrahamsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There should be quite a few manufacturers making units like these, I know
> the MRV people does it as well (or some company within MRV).
here's another:
http://www.opticalaccess.com/products-ld.shtml
Disclaimer: I'm not affiliated with the co
Mikael Abrahamsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10 Aug 2002, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> > why on god's earth would subsecond anything matter in a
> > nonmilitary situation?
>
> It does when you start doing streaming anything, say TV or telephony. I
I submit that it doesn't matter for voice or
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You are approaching the problem at the wrong end by asking "what's in
> it for me to adopt IPv6 now". The real question is "is IPv6
> inevitable in the long run".
Death is inevitable "in the long run", but "end it all today" is
probably not the
Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There were lower levels of priority that you could also use,
> but "flash" was the top one that I heard about.
The four buttons on the "1633" row of an AUTOVON telephone are labeled
P, I, F, and FO for Priority, Immediate, Flash, and Flash-Overri
"Steven M. Bellovin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Robert E.Seastrom" writes:
>>Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> There were lower levels of priority that you could also use,
>>> but "flash" was the top one that I heard about.
>>
>>The four butt
Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Already, some 21 TLDs are whitelisted, including .cn, .tw, a number
>> of European ccTLDs, .museum, and .info. Any other registrars who
>> want to be supported can simply E-mail Gerv at the Mozilla
>> Foundation, or his Opera counterpart, and gi
OK, not really "in the core", but the subject made you look at least. :)
I'm interested in people's experiences with consumer-grade routers
functioning in non-NAT mode; that is to say, running PPPoE to the ISP
and routing a /29 or a /28. A sane filtering language and stateful
firewall that can
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> We should all be looking to the security auditing work done by
> the OpenBSD team for an example of how systems can be
> cleaned up, fixed, and locked down if there is a will to do so.
Beer, unsupported assertions, and lack of rigorous audit methodology
can be blend
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> If not, once again, I'd ask you to cite sources rather
>> than make broad sweeping statements about what is already available.
>> Appealing to some anonymous authority in order to claim the sky is
>> falling is hardly endearing.
>
> I think that people who special
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am going to be cutting over about 75,000 DSL lines from
> one core network to another. Does anyone have
> recommendations on subnet and DHCP scope size? If I make
> them /23s I have to do about 145 subents. If I make them
> /22s I only have
David Hagel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would there be any data out there on what fraction from this 60ms to
> 80ms RTT is raw propagation delay and what fraction is typical packet
> queuing delay at intermediate switches? Does queuing delay play much
> of a role at all these days? Or is it al
"Howard, W. Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Do carrier ISPs classify their voice traffic as Really
> Important, and everybody else's data as Best Effort? This
> isn't just selfishness, since We All Know voice is less
> tolerant of latency and jitter than TCP.
We do?
Try to keep a single-
Network Fortius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anybody having any idea why such a high packet loss on lever3's
> network, in Chicago?
End-user misinterpreting output from MTR. This network does not
appear to have any packet loss end-to-end.
---Rob
> St
"Stephen J. Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> wheres the ops in this?
>
> dont get me wrong, i'm sympathetic with new orleans and also
> definitely not a bush supporter but this is verging on incitement
> and i dont see the point of the post to here
My guess: someone who doesn't like Paul
"Israel, David B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, my practical solution to this one is max-prefixing your peers.
> It means you have to watch your peers slow growth, but frankly, you
> should be watching that anyway.
Max-prefix is part of the battle.
A corollary "max-aggregate" where
Todd Vierling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Seriously, though, that's exactly what you're describing, and about what I'd
> suggest in a no-other-option scenario -- but if it's possible to pull fiber
> through the conduits, it would probably be far less expensive long term, or
> even medium term
Joseph S D Yao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dave,
>
> I think the mail gateways back when the various networks were being put
> together into an internet had as their functional purpose unifying
> disparate networks. On the contrary, a firewall has as its purpose
> partitioning a network that
"Marshall Eubanks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am I the only one who feels that an NDA, even an NDA with a vendor, is an
> agreement that should be honored ?
>
> I know they are silly in many case, but still...
We certainly wish for our vendors to honor *their* NDAs with us, don't
we? RIRs
Mikael Abrahamsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>>> Would it be improper to suggest that you pick a different acronym? :-)
>>
>> yes it would be.
>>
>> everything in language A has a strange connotation in some other
>> language B. e.g., my name is gre
Matthew Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Everything looks like it is configured properly on my servers but the
> customer is reporting that certain parents (VerizonDSL, Comcast,
> DirectWAY) can connect to certain website and not others. At this
> point I think the problem is with the DNS
Matthew Crocker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yeah, yeah, that is overrated. If my site goes dark and my DNS goes
> down it doesn't really matter as the bandwidth and the web server
> will also be down. Having a live DNS server in another part of the
> country won't help if the access routers
Sabri Berisha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To get
> an understanding of routing-protocols, begin with RIP[3] and perhaps
> run your own RIP-lab
necromancy will be severely punished.
---rob
Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> er... the first depeering flaps have -already- occured in IPv6
>> space. there are several (mostly EU-based) ISPs that refuse to
>> peer w/ folks using 3ffe:: space and/or filter that prefix
Daniel Golding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10/7/05 11:02 AM, "Ross Hosman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> Google Goes to Washington
>>
>> One of the issues Google will tackle has become news
>> this week: Level 3 and Cogent Communications are
>> involved in a spat that has made Web si
Kevin Loch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
>> Certainly these are high-margin but low-bandwidth customers, maybe
>> with enough complaints Cogent will be willing to stick them on a
>> smaller seperate ASN which is willing to buy transit.
>
> Does anyone have reachabili
"Hannigan, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > On Oct 6, 2005, at 10:34 AM, Peter R. wrote:
>> >
>> > On 10/1/05, Cogent's network (AS174 -- a very old network)
>> > originated the equivalent of 1x /8 + 1x /9 -- that's 1.67% of the
>> > "ends" that constitute the global end-to-end netw
>> Moore will likely have to continue to produce the solution.
>
> What happens if he can't? Silicon technology *is* topping out. What
> happens to v6 if every single household and business on the planet
> decides to multihome?
I often wonder what would happen if IETF and NANOG were to
collect
Nils Ketelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben Butler wrote:
>
>> if anyone had a view on what would happen if I managed to source an
>> SDRAM of 512MB / 1GB of the same specification as the 256MB Cisco
>> compatible memory that you use in an 7200 NPE225. Cisco say the maximum
>> ram for that
Please pardon the crossposting between ppml and nanog...
Geoff Huston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Why /48 rather than /47 or /49? - alignment to nibble boundaries to
> make DNS delegation easier.
It has recently come to my attention that we are in error when we
expect "n[iy]bble" to have the
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> but it will be a classic. if you can get and edit it, send
> it to boing boing or /.
Pearls before swine.
In my rss aggregator, boingboing and /. are labeled "a Directory for
Dilettantes" and "News for Goobers" respectively.
"Ben Butler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone got any comments about how good or otherwise the Cisco 7200 +
> NPE-G1 or 7301, both with 1GB of RAM, is as a eBGP router + L2TP
> terminator for DSL subs, in terms of scalability for bandwidth through
> put & the number of VPDN sessions it can t
Henry Yen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In (at least) the Long Island, NY market, Verizon FTTH/FIOS installers
> physically cut and decommission the copper upon fiber install.
> Bye-bye DSL competition. Since they won't bring back the copper
> even you don't like the FIOS service, it's permanen
Peter Dambier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Used to have its IPv6 enabled. Gave me problems with connectivity.
> I dont have IPv6 to the outside so I had to disable the stack.
> Runs a lot smoother now.
> It tooks me week to get the IPv6 stack running in the first place.
You've had quite the ru
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Interesting how many companies are "parked" at a lawyers office,
> i.e. the official address of the company is that of it's legal
> firm. One wonders why an abuse organization would not use this same
> tactic and register a legal firm as the administrative contact.
H
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 19-dec-04, at 5:45, Sean Donelan wrote:
>
>> Some manufactures, such as Apple AirPort Extreme, also make dialup
>> gateways with dialup modem PPP and firewall capabilities.
>
> Actually the Airport Extreme doesn't do firewalling.
It does PNA
Mike Damm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 13:45:36 +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 1. Block [EMAIL PROTECTED] in your access.db
>
> Suggestions on modifying upstream/peers 'access.db' welcome.
>
> Spewing false and libelous abuse complaints is an i
Dan Hollis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Why is this a problem? ECN has to be deployed on routers, and it
>> currently isn't.
>
> Because tcp connection endpoints have to implement ECN in order to manage
> the flow.
A naive reader might think from Dan's posting that the Internet didn't
work
John Kristoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think you may be fearful that the use of reserved bits introduces
> a new security risk, because of something a system may do in response
> to the use of those new fields. That is a very legitimate concern
> and a very real potential risk. I guess
John Kristoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 01:51:01 -0500
> "Robert E.Seastrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You must not remember how SunOS 4 responded when handed icmp echo
>> requests with the record-route option set (passed the packet on for
>> the next guy to enjoy a
"Erik Amundson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In my experience it depends on the model of router. I had a 3640
> (granted, it's old) with 128MB that was just fine until a couple of
> months ago, now it's not enough. For one BGP table you will have to
> have at least 256MB in a 36xx router. Ou
Jim Popovitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've often wondered, as I work intimately with NMS software, just how
> much cross network traffic is "are you there?" related. Would it have a
> positive impact on overall net performance if everyone just turned off
> all internetwork status polling?
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In this period of time, the White Knights built the InterOp shownets and
> we had comparative access to quite a lot of vendor product, and know that
> the red buttons on Wellfleets were correctly positioned on the front, for
>
"Mike Callahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> By any chance is this list available via xml/rss?
There are several email to rss gateway software packages out there; it
would be trivial to roll your own.
YMMV, but after reading a couple of other mailing lists that were
gatewayed to rss, my sense
"Eric Pylko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One of my favorites is "The Elements of Networking Style" by M.A. Padlipsky.
> The description starts off as "The World's Only Known Constructively Snotty
> Computer Science Book..."
>
> My copy (acquired sometime in the early 90's) was recommended by s
Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This issue went national in March 2005 with the addition of a new
>> N11 number for "One Call"
>> notification.
>> http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-257293A1.pdf
>>
>> The new abbreviated number will be 811 and it looks like carriers
>> are
It took no less than four re-reads before it sank in that this message
is not, in fact, spam.
---rob
"Peter & Karin Dambier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is it one third of the total internet population
> for whom it makes sense to see "--" in hostnames
"Todd Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How many people are using Juniper routers on their networks
Lots.
> and what is your experiences with them?
Usually good.
> Also, what equipment do you use for switching?
Schneider. http://www.squared.com/
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The thousands of bilateral BGP peering contracts are most
> definitely comparable to the email peering that I am
> proposing.
Dude, it's 2005. You can put down the X.400 crack pipe now.
---Rob
"james edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am looking for a seller of outdoor Telephone pedestals. I plan to install
> a DSLAM, post splitters
> and associated cross connect gear in this enclosure. Can anyone suggest a
> dealer for this sort of gear ?
http://www.sprintnorthsupply.com/
http
"Wayne E. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> One vendor in particular sees ISIS as "an ISP protocol" and OSPF as "an
>> enterprise protocol". Their implementation of the latter has often gotten
>> many enterprise-oriented features (e.g. dial-on-demand link support) that
>> the other didn'
Eric Gauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Honestly, I completely agree with you that MD5'ing our OSPF
> adjacencies isn't a great idea (I've so far stalled its roll-out).
> I strongly argued against it internally. There were, however, those
> in both the networking and security groups that we
Peter Dambier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> European ISPs and Asian ISPs do change to the Public-Root because their
> customers need to send emails to each other. Curiously enough their is
> no SPAM on Public-Root email addresses. I thought the spammers were
> located in Asia and Europe only?
C
Andrew Dorsett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey everyone, I know this is slightly off topic but I'm hoping that someone
> from Verisign or the like will respond. I am looking for a VERY secure
> computer cabinet to replace an open rack I have now. I'm looking for almost
> vault like quali
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hmm... $2400 is still in the "pricey" range to be throwing out
> > bunches of these across a network in wide distribution.
>
> and why would one want to do so? run one strat 1, two at most
No.
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&selm=3C32924F.994
Alex Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am looking for a manufacturer of telco cages used in datacenter
> applications; any pointers would be appreciated.
The technical term is "woven-wire partitions" or "welded wire
partitions", depending on who's doing the talking..
WireCrafters:
Tatsuya Kawasaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stephen,
> thnx .. I think query source refer to DNS server right?
> not necessary actally host that requesting qurey?
Correct.
> Suppose if a ISP does not have fully messed DNS server then result may not
> be optimum?
Also correct. A problem w
"Barton F Bruce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Typical 120/208V small branch circuit breakers in small buildings and homes
> have an interrupting capacity rated at 10,000 amps, and should not be
> deployed where that can be exceeded. It will be on the label.
It's worth noting that the interrupt
"Stephen Sprunk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thus spake joe mcguckin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > It only takes 30ma to put your heart into atrial fibrillation. In the
> > usa, gfi's are set to trip at 5ma.
>
> Did you mean 5A, or am I misunderstanding GFIs?
it's 5ma. http://www.national.com/ds
Charles Sprickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Paul Vixie wrote:
>
> >
> > Deal Enables ISC to Mirror DNS Root Server in Additional U.S. Locations
>
> Let's hope Telehouse put them on the "good" generator. "N+1" is no fun if
> the "+1" can't be routed to the 5th floor wh
More detailed technical information on the periodic I2 Land Speed
Record contest can be found at http://lsr.internet2.edu/
The answer to "what's good about this" is left as an exercise to the reader.
---Rob
"Stephen J. Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK. Am I in a alternate universe? I have run ntpdate for years on a
> variety of systems, almost all of the BSD family. (I count the VMS
> implementation in TGV software as BSD.) I have never seen '-g' and have
> always had '-b' as the boot option. I
"Hannigan, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's NTPv4 isn't it?
>
> I also prefer to use three peers vs. two. Always an odd number,
> greater than 1. Assumptions can't be made about the mathematics
> behind time, but in a reference model, odd numbers are better.
Actually, three is no
Since none of the usual suspects have noted it, I'll give a cursory
nod to an ILEC (Verizon) fiber cut that happened mid-afternoon
yesterday in Ashburn, VA. About a thousand POTS customers were down
(including several OOB dialups of which I am aware in the Equinix
facility in Ashburn), as well a
Dan Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Forgive me, but
>
> Isn't Sonet usually deployed in a ring? Why the heck would a fiber
> this important not be?
sonet, obviously, does not *have* to be in a ring, but it often is.
unfortunately, a fair percentage of the time, the additional
protecti
Macs and Lisas did this as well.
---Rob
"Alexei Roudnev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I saw such technique in 1986 (approx) year on hardware level - russia
> computer Elbrus did it.
>
>
>
> : Re: Cisco HFR
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, May 26, 2004, Iljitsc
"Dr. Jeffrey Race" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Poof! MCI spam problem goes away in 30 days.
http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html
I think the discussion is over.
---Rob
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm not talking about intended beneficiaries. I agree with your statement
> > when applied to intended beneficiaries. I'm talking about the character
> > of the preponderance of actual beneficiaries, whether measured by number
> > of domain registrati
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> on a 2511, which i am using as a serial console server for a bunch
> of boxes, how do i send a on one of the lines?
telnet break is translated to long-space serial break:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [6] % telnet scrapheap 2003
Trying 10.1.1.25
Connected to 10.1.
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [6] % telnet scrapheap 2003
> > Trying 10.1.1.25
> > Connected to 10.1.1.25.
> > Escape character is '^]'.
>
> i am seriously shocked by the number of folk in this forum who not
> only seem to use telnet over the internet, but seem wil
"Michel Py" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The dead processor still has to be replaced, but this is scheduled
> maintenance, not outage. A little extra ammo when you have to hunt five
> or six nines.
MTTR on a single box is irrelevant when you are off playing Ponce de
Leon, hunting the Fountain
Nico Schottelius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> P.S.: If you are interested in the background of this story, read
> http://nico.schotteli.us/papers/net/orkut-diary for more information.
My $0.02 social commentary on orkut (and similar social networking
sites) is at http://www.fedster.com/
*.ork
"Stephen J. Wilcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> was hoping for something within about a block of the hyatt,
> preferably populated by fellow nanogers.. i'll see what folks are
> doing
Reston "Town Center" is not a real "downtown"; it's an artificial
open-air shopping mall. The Hyatt is the o
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ... Reston is Hell, but with better visuals.
>
> I'm not certain of the truth of this comparison, having only half the data
> at hand. However, it has to be just about the least interesting place on
> the whole Eastern seab
Mikael Abrahamsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there anyone who can justify this pricing with anything else than
> "because we can?"
To expand on what I said to you privately, let's follow the money:
Assume $200,000/board as the marginal cost of manufacturing one.
Assume a minimum of 65
Bill Woodcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about the ccTLD prefixes? There are a lot more of them. And the
> gTLDs? And exchange points? And Microsoft Update servers? Where do you
> stop?
If you simply don't dampen (hooray for adequate CPUs), then you are
not only honoring the "golde
John Starta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A29911-2004Sep17.html
Printer-friendly version for your signin-bypassing pleasure:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A29911-2004Sep17?language=printer
I was a little closer to the Ashburn one than I
Sean Donelan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 1) Good that they [seemed] to have maintained partial power.
>
> It would be interesting to find out what happened to the two UPSes that
> apparently failed. Was it something that exceeded the design, i.e. a
> lightning strike greater than X joules?
Lars-Johan Liman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I cannot agree to the "block port 25" line of action.
>
> I am a Unix sysadmin, with 15 years of experience as sendmail and DNS
> expert. I have a DSL line at home, with static IP, and generic rDNS
> provided by my ISP. Behind it I have a serious Un
Alexander Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 22 September 2004 10:40:30 -0400, Robert E.Seastrom wrote:
> [..]
>> Buy an appropriate connectivity product for your home connectivity and
>> the problems go away. Put your servers in a colo (a la
>> http://www.vix.com/personalcolo/ ) and th
Randy Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> lars-johan's posting was a wonderfully eloquent plea for the
> survival of the internet, as opposed to the walled-garden telco
> model.
In a vacuum, we all agree with him. He should be sending his plea to
Redmond, from whence comes the vulnerable soft
Ian Dickinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My point is that no-export or no-advertise doesn't play well with
> multiple ASNs under common admin control.
If this is your situation, perhaps already you have propagation
suppression communities that cause the Right Thing to happen at the
outer edg
"Charlie Khanna - NextWeb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wireless is a great option, if it's an option at all - I would just make
> sure to get a licensed link so you don't worry about getting knocked of the
> air by some rogue interferer.
Licensed offers no such guarantee; all it offers is so
Tony Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My preferred solution at this point is for the UN to take over
> management of the entire Internet and for them to issue a policy of
> one prefix per country. This will have all sorts of nasty downsides
> for national providers and folks that care about opt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> When you add Ethernet as a requirement then you are asking for an
> I/O interface that is more complex and more expensive than the basic
> temp/hum recorder on the PIC.
Or not.
http://www.lantronix.com/device-networking/embedded-device-servers/xport.html
(no, it do
"Christopher L. Morrow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe thats an FN-FAL rifle, not a M-16... I wonder if telcom's could
> employ these folks to watch over their fiber lines to keep the backhoes
> away?
It's a SIG SG550, not an FAL or an M16.
---R
"J. Oquendo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Apologies beforehand if this post seems a bit odd,
> but I did not see anything similar to a networking
> 'vuln'dev', and besides I wouldn't think that any
> one here would do something malicious with any idea
> that actually worked for the worse.
This
"N. Richard Solis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FedEx will be your best bet. Trust me.
FedEx Heavy = "pay a surcharge for heavy boxes, get it moved by a 120
pound delivery person with a handtruck rather than a pallet jack or
other appropriate freight handling equipment... and dropped off the
Andy Walden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That's it Rob, let it all out. ;) I can certainly empathize, as I have
> have my bad experiences with Fedex as well. We also use Emery on a
> regular basis for the big things also. The bottom line is, like vendors,
> all shippers can suck at times...it r
er.
>
> If anybody has counter-to-counter on their disaster recovery plans you
> may want to get setup as a "known shipper". I went through the process
> with United's Cargo division http://www.unitedcargo.com. I used them
> as a backup to America West A
"N. Richard Solis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> BTW, counter-to-counter service isn't always handled as luggage. In a
> few cases the package is hand-carried over to the cargo terminal where
> it's put on the next flight out. Then it's held for you at the
> destination, NOT put out on the
"Nathan J. Mehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is a Stratum 0 source so once placed behind a Unix/Cisco/Juniper
> > box you have a stratum 1 source. This will cost you 30,000 ->
> > 100,000 US per unit. The beam tube will require replacement
> > approx every 5 years f
just me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In theory this doesnt break anything, since the nameservers in
> question aren't providing recursive service to anyone. Any questions
> they see are the result of a followed delegation. So I don't see why
> this would cause problems anywhere.
I'd sure hate
just me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 14 Oct 2003, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>
> just me <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > In theory this doesnt break anything, since the nameservers in
> > question aren't providing recursive service to any
Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I believe at least one antispam service - spamcop.net - had its domain
> pulled by joker.com, ostensibly for "invalid whois data". This seems
> to be fixed now.
http://www.julianhaight.com/jokerstupidity.shtml
google search for "air to air heat exchanger" - there are many
companies that make products that do exactly what you want.
---rob
Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Faced with the prospect once again of significantly higher energy
> prices coming
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
