http://www.multicasttech.com/status/index.html and
http://www.multicasttech.com/status/mbgp.sum
If you need multicast and your ISP can't or won't deliver, please
contact us and we will see what we can do.
--
Regards
our company is penalized by the FCC for bad ratings, so
> don't report any problems that you do not have to.
>
You forgot my favorite :
Every trouble report from a customer must include at least 2 hours on
hold before a ticket is opened.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
> On Wed, 24 Ap
alerts and
> updates about what is going on with UUNET ?
>
Hello;
For some reason they have been deagregating
since Wednesday morning - double the number of prefixes in a
little less announced address space.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
> - Original Message -
> From: "S
the offender
> nearly impossible.
>
> Any small piece of help, advice, or pointer would be most
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks most much.
>
Is the whole problem just a lack of address space, or
is there something more you are trying to do ?
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
> John Beckmeyer
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
line.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
> It's a lack of IP Address Space - and the numbers I gave
> - 10's of
> thousands are probably a bit on the small side - in short
> order it will
> be multiples of 100,000 IP addresses. To start with, I'm
> willing to
> think in te
t to pay for it can get it here :
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A6960-2002Apr30.html
Marshall Eubanks
it from both my providers, AT&T Can, and
> Telus.
>
> Thanks
> Andrew
>
I did not see this on Sprint, UUNet or vBNS.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
Figure 1b of
http://www.multicasttech.com/status/index.html
you can clearly see both jumps.
AS 705 has only one ASN in transit through it from here.
The recent change was all _inside_ AS 705.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
>
> Last Tuesday had an increase of 2,000 routes.
>
> +7000 routes in a week
the global view, sadly
>>>they appear to be hanging around.
>>>
>>>Last Tuesday had an increase of 2,000 routes.
>>>
>>>+7000 routes in a week is significant de-aggregation or leak, any ideas on
>>>where these routes are flowing ?
>>>
&g
cts.
>
Foundry has a limited PIM snooping ability on their switches. Does anyone know
of an operational PIM-Snooping based MIX ?
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
> Cheers
> Toerless
>
> P.S.: Oh, and of course one way to get a multi-policy setup very simply
> without mult
ee.
>
Doesn't the LINX have a separate LAN for a multicast exchange ? I know that
this was set up, but I don't know what it's current status is.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
> I think theres a danger on very large switching fabrics that if youre not
> specific things will ha
nt Ivy League...
>>>>
>>>> Oh.. Shoot, did it again.
>>>>
>>>>Have you ever heard the expression "Flat World Thinking" ?
>>>>
>>>>Einstein was a Hero to many a Kid, -because- he was self taught.
>>>>
On Thu, 30 May 2002 09:48:50 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 30 May 2002 09:20:17 EDT, Leo Bicknell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Since you have to connect to two or more providers to get an ASN,
> > and since the whole reason to have an ASN is to inject things into
> > the DFZ it d
org/rfc/rfc2770.txt
where a /24 is assigned automatically.
It would add 30% to the number of BGP address blocks pretty much automatically.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
>
> Since you have to connect to two or more providers to get an ASN,
> and since the whole reason to have an ASN is
On Thu, 30 May 2002 10:58:31 -0400
Leo Bicknell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In a message written on Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:40:47AM -0400, Marshall
> Eubanks wrote:
> > It would add 30% to the number of BGP address blocks pretty much
> automatically.
>
> How do y
On Thu, 30 May 2002 17:52:55 -0700
"Tony Hain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> > Since I run a small AS :
> >
> > I like this idea.
> >
> > Since I believe in living dangerously :
> >
> > I also think that a
IPv6 that means a /48 makes sense as an
> initial allocation with a new ASN, and a /64 does not.
>
> Tony
>
>
>
>
--
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
This e-mail may contain confidential and proprietary information of
Multicast Technolo
routes from his peers last
> night, but they've cleared up now. Either there is a odd bug in vendor's
Define "lots". I see about 500 inconsistent routes in BGP, have seen them
since last June (when I started looking), made inquiries, and was told that this
was due to p
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002 12:58:38 -0500 (CDT)
Rob Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, all.
>
> ] Define "lots". I see about 500 inconsistent routes in BGP, have seen them
>
> I see a few more than that:
>
> http://www.cymru.com/BGP/incon01.html
Dear Rob;
My lists are at
http://www.multica
sends 10 packets
per second and, with 127 beacons now participating, it adds up.
IMHO a rate of 1 packet per second would be sufficient, and would
cut the beacon traffic down to a reasonable size.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:02:48 -0400
Joe Provo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 11:41:11PM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> [snip]
> > I am not sure that the difference between 500 and 800 is
> > that significant.
>
> A recent snapshot a
beginning of June.
Questions, comments, etc., welcomed.
Reards
Marshall Eubanks
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2002 15:02:48 -0400
> Joe Provo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 11:41:11PM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>>[snip]
>>
>
I see the same from AS 16517 -
*> 205.139.72.0 216.177.55.5 500 15076 701
3561 23037 {80,109,122,...
Note that our paths diverge after AS 23037
Could IMC Internet (ASN-IMC-BGP) be the source of the problem.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
Mike Lewinski wrote:
&
This has disappeared from here...
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> I see the same from AS 16517 -
>
> *> 205.139.72.0 216.177.55.5 500 15076 701
> 3561 23037 {80,109,122,...
>
> Note that our paths diverge after AS 23037
> Could IMC In
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 18:43:44 -0700 (PDT)
Bill Woodcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> > Is this the anycast based on MSDP ?
>
> Anycast, not multicast.
>
> -Bill
>
>
Dear Rodney;
Thanks for the info.
Rodney Joffe wrote:
> Marshall,
>
> First, I hope you don't mind that I cut all the additional cc's. I don't
> think any of the folks really needed extra copies ;-)
>
> Now...
>
> Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
were _underbilled_, by any carrier, they would be unlikely to
give details here. And I have seen some fairly major underbilling. YMMV.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
>
> I don't think we've done business with *any* telco that hasn't
> overbilled us, both LECs (BellSouth, GTE/Ve
Marshall Eubanks
T.M. Eubanks
Multicast Technologies, Inc
10301 Democracy Lane, Suite 410
Fairfax, Virginia 22030
Phone : 703-293-9624 Fax : 703-293-9609
e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.multicasttech.com
Test your network for multicast :
http
ed into nevernever land.
> I love the GBLX network when it works, but god help you if you ever
> need to talk to a clueful NOC person to fix a problem (especially after
> hours.)
>
> bill
>
>
--
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
T.M. Euban
week or so - due to e-bone ?
20 or so AS have dropped off.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
Pete Kruckenberg wrote:
> I'm doing some analysis of who I might be able to reach via
> multicast through Sprint.
>
> Sadly, route-views multicast peering with Sprint is not
> working at
into old age so rapidly ?
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
> Well, end of the week and the responses dried up pretty quickly, I think
> thats a
> response in itself to my question!
>
> Okay, heres a summary which was requested by a few people:
>
> Other people too are intereste
ck is to mark packets
> meaningfully. Also, the WFQ introduces some additional latency at our
> edge.
Is this different from port filtering as is commonly done with, e.g.,
gnutella ?
Or, to put it another way, how are the packets marked ? And why not just
drop them then and there, instead o
Unless you are in "the swamp" - the old Class C, where I believe that
they do accept /24's.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 05:10:28PM -0400, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
>
>>http://info.us.bb.verio.net/routing.html#Pe
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:37:35 +0900
"Don Wilder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andre,
>
Netrail was bought by Cogent after it went belly up. Try
their NOC.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
> Using ARIN's Whois service I obtained the following:
> as4006
&g
ld this be an example of the
"65 second problem", where the router stops dead for one or two seconds
out of every 65 seconds ?
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
> For fun, the provider brought it up to 622 mbit/second, and loss dropped
> considerably, but still hangs at about 1 to 2 percent.
) [AS 701] 76 msec 72 msec
76 msec
10 216-127-232-33.focaldata.net (216.127.232.33) [AS 19655] 72 msec 72 msec 72
msec
11 altrio-36.focaldata.net (216.127.233.36) [AS 19655] 76 msec 76 msec 76 msec
12 216-127-233-53.focaldata.net (216.127.233.53) [AS 19655] 76 msec 76 msec 72
msec
Regards
Marshall
ech.com/status/index.html
http://www.multicasttech.com/status/bgp.plot
113,226 routes
From
http://bgp.potaroo.net/
AS1221 Telstra 132191
AS4637 Reach 112334
AS286 KPNQwest 111398
AS6447 Route-Views.Oregon-ix.net 119900
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
ms
63.251.52.76 PING Statistics
10 packets transmitted, 10 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 1/5533/10148
What can give such huge RTT's ?
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
;>bytes of memory
>>>
>>>>We don't filter either and...
>>>>
>>>>117800 network entries and 339843 paths using 23660948
>>>>
>>>bytes of memory
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"about 135k prefixes last i ch
nog 23 :
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0110/eubanks.html
You should also look at the other two presentations on 9/11 and the Internet
at that meeting :
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0110/agenda.html
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
T.M. Eubank
Thought this would be considered on-topic as guess who would have
to clean up the resulting messes...
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
- Forwarded message from Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Declan McCullagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: FC: Draft of Rep. Berman'
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:54:59 GMT
"Fergie (Paul Ferguson)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I hope many of you saw this near- real-time. It was awsome.
It was indeed. I like to use Alexa to look at web site rankings, so here
is a comparison of the recent encounter and the Mars Rover landings
ht
And finally, if you are reading this from inside said area... get the hell
> out
> of there!
>
Yes. If you have doubts, Google camille pass christian 1969
> --
> Regards,
> Chris Gilbert
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
a
limited area that
could be kept cool when everything else went dark.
> I think if nothing else, this is at least a success story of building a
> NOC which can provide critical infrastructure that will survive major
> disasters.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Chris Gilbert
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
On Fri, 2 Sep 2005 11:38:39 -0400
Joshua Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> To get your friday going to a good roll:
>
> I will not be able to make it to the game due to the hurricane (I am
> going down to help relief efforts) so to keep this on topic and get to
> the point. the first perso
g gotten 2002-3 through ARIN, this
should pass
eventually.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
On Sep 10, 2005, at 3:38 AM, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
[Perhaps this thread should migrate to Multi6?]
perhaps... then jason can argue this instead of m
cal US traffic is
much
different.
There may be similar statistics for Geant - I would be interested to see them.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
>
> I think the last v6 traffic study I saw still said +90% of the v6 traffic
> was still ping/traceroute :(
>
>
>
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 15:59:00 +0200
Simon Leinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [CC'ing Stanislav Shalunov, who does the Internet2 weekly reports.]
>
> Marshall Eubanks writes, in response to Jordi's "8% IPv6" anecdote:
> > These estimates seem way high an
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 17:41:51 -0400
John Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 12, 2005, at 6:58 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>
> >> I'll be blunt. As long as that question is up in the air, none of
> >> the major content providers are going to do anything serious in the
> >> IPv6
one immediate advantage
I would agree with Mark. Even buried copper can make an
excellent guide for lightning to come right into your equipment, and it can
only be
isolated so much. (Remember, the electrical potential of the ground can vary
over
a cable run, and will vary if there are elevatio
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 08:44:16 -0400
"Steven M. Bellovin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Robert E.Seastrom" writes:
> >
> >
> >Todd Vierling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> Seriously, though, that's exactly what you're describing, and about what
> >> I'd
> >>
Am I the only one who feels that an NDA, even an NDA with a vendor, is an
agreement that should be honored ?
I know they are silly in many case, but still...
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 23:12:40 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > If need be I&
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 14:35:14 +0200
JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It seems that the list doesn't like the attachments, anyway, the text show
> the results for the awstats.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry the late answer, traveling and overbooked ... My reply below, in-line.
>
> Rega
w.6net.org/publications/papers/csc-6to4.pdf
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
P.S. I may have inadvertantly sent a blank reply to the list just before
this. (My web based email hiccuped.) If so, I apologize.
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry the late answer, traveling and overbooked ... My reply be
age is slightly off topic from NANOG, but kinda fits
> in response to parent and am hoping not to get flamed.
FWIW, I would suggest ISP Survival Guide: Strategies for Running a Competitive
ISP (Paperback)
by Geoff Huston - ISBN: 0471314994, which does a good job with the basics, and
is pretty
easy to read.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
>
> Any suggestions?
>
>
> A Padawan,
> Mark Owen
serious plans to use) IPv6 on
at least 100,000 "unique devices" (routers, computers, etc.) and also
multi-homes.
This is a compromise between doing nothing, and the original
2002-3 like proposal.
I would also urge interested parties to comment on PPML.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
>
> - Kevin
on't do porn, but I would be highly interested in free bandwidth. I
suspect others
would be too...
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
>
> --
> Sabri
>
> please do not throw salami pizza away
Dear Sabri;
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 16:34:19 +0200
Sabri Berisha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 10:17:51AM -0400, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> Dear Marshall,
>
> > > Just wait for a popular adult-content-provider offering website-
one have any real numbers?
According to Pekka in this paper
http://www.6net.org/publications/papers/csc-6to4.pdf
"The traffic of our 6to4 relay has been quite modest; in August 2004,
the steady state was only about (a relatively constant) 300-500
kbit/s at 50-100 packets per second. However, quite often there
are peaks to 10 Mbit/s and even beyond."
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
tocols or technologies are to be discouraged, redirected
to appropriate other fora, or re-cast to discussions of broader
implications for Internet architecture.
Maybe this conversation should move there. Maybe a lot of operators should
join that
list. Probably couldn't hurt.
Regards
Marsh
f
MH-1 is inevitable. I
think that inevitably means some sort of
geographical or topological based prefix, less-than-optimal routing for at
least some packets, and
much less user control compared to MH-2. Regional exchanges might be nice,
but are not necessary.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
onnectivity is also still lousy, so I would tentatively
conclude that there are
still problems out there somewhere.
On the other hand, streaming audio to my home in Cox Communications doesn't
seem to have lost a
packet in 2 hours.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
> -Sean
>
> Sean P. Crandall
> VP Engineering Operations
> MegaPath Networks Inc.
> 6691 Owens Drive
> Pleasanton, CA 94588
> (925) 201-2530 (office)
> (925) 201-2550 (fax)
>
>
,
as seen, e.g., by the steady
dribble of low number DOD ASN's that leak out from time to time, but
it does
not seem that this pool is very large.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
13,997 are origin onlu (i.e. they are not seen in the middle of an
AS path), 66 are transit only and 6.979 ar
Hello;
On Nov 16, 2005, at 1:16 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
--On November 15, 2005 8:14:38 PM -0800 David Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--On November 15, 2005 6:28:21 AM -0800 David Barak
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK... Let me try this again... True competition requires
that it
I know I would.
Regards
Marshall
On Dec 13, 2005, at 11:17 PM, Tony Li wrote:
What good is 6Mbit DSL from my ISP (say, SBC for example) if only
a small
portion of the net (sites that pay for non-degraded access) loads
at a
reasonable speed and everything else sucks?
One might argue t
s ? Would their customers be happy ?
Of course, based on some recent experience this probably means that
this will be adopted enthusiastically.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
On Dec 14, 2005, at 7:05 AM, Per Heldal wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 19:12:31 -0800, "Joe McGuckin" <[EMAIL
x27;s most precious commodity)
is to explain to them why it's a good thing that your service is
broken, you're crazy.
On Dec 14, 2005, at 10:18 AM, Schliesser, Benson wrote:
Marshall Eubanks wrote:
If these don't work, people will complain. Just imagine for a second
that
Hello Dave;
This won't open for me.
Do you have a pdf of these slides ?
Regards;
Marshall
On Dec 15, 2005, at 10:39 PM, David Meyer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:34:56PM -0800, David Meyer wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:29:29AM +, Christopher L. Morrow
wrote:
On Thu, 15 Dec 2
n.
specifically, 2005-1
http://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/2005_1.html
Comments by all are welcomed.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
As for deaggregation, it is not
recommended because some filter (/48's) and some don't which results
in sub-optimal paths, but it can be done depending on what your
peers will accept.
- Kevin
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 14:16:58 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > That's not the point. If without anycast this is better than with
> > anycast, then this should go on the "con" list for anycast.
>
> People often confuse two separate technical things
> here. One is the BGP anycast technique wh
Hi Randy;
Do you have any idea what sort of underprovisioning is typical for this sort
of service in Japan ? Do they really have anything like a symmetric 100 Mbps all
the way back to the backbone ?
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
de for public release becomes technically
feasible.
To get back to Randy Bush's comment on Japanese bandwidth to the home, if
everyone
has 100 Mbps symmetric, I expect ideas such as this to use it up.
> Thomas
>
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
> - Original Message -
&
m their infrastructure, in the same way this is done with
> inter-domain multicast for live TV content from those same content
> providers.
>
Which of course is not the same as saying that it can't be duplicated.
> Thomas
>
Regards
Marshall
> - Original Message ---
lticast transit or BGP (or anything
else, AFAIK).
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
> Nothing on their webpage, but I have some customers jumping up and down
> screaming at me about a 'global network outage', and I frankly don't want
> to believe them on a Friday. (i.e., I have t
they don't want to open it up to any video stream - they
want
content providers to pay for the privilege).
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
P.S. If you google on this, be aware that multicast also means sending two or
more digital video channels over the air in 1 FCC channel allocation. When
news repor
d other's) experiences. This, of
course, was exactly what 2002-3 / 4.2.1.5 was intended to prevent !
Of course, just as new allocations to ARIN or RIPE are announced here,
it may be a good idea to start announcing 2002-3 allocations as well.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
>
> Thanks!
&
On Fri, 13 May 2005 11:00:31 -0700
Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> > ...
> >
> >Of course, just as new allocations to ARIN or RIPE are announced here,
> >it may be a good idea to start announcing 2002-3 allocations as w
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:28:50 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hm. It just sounds like a Tibco nack implosion to me.
>
>
I was wondering if this had anything to do with the common use of multicast to
propagate
trading information...
Regards
Marshall
>
>
>
> Internet
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 03:53:09 -0600
Jeff Murri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm hoping here that this post isn't out of line with the scope of the
> NANOG list, of which I've been a long time lurker. If so, please just
> ignore me.
>
Hello Jeff;
These are both moving averages, the quest
On Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:07:06 -0700
Eric Frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 09:56 AM 6/10/2005, Fred Baker wrote:
>
> >you saw marshall's comment. If you're interested in a moving average, he's
> >pretty close.
> >
> >If I understood your question, though, you simply wanted to quantify t
-06-29-05-Web
Well, when I was in the "gummint", we used to get these missives all the the
time.
(My personal favorite was the one that said that US Navy had to conduct all
email over Outlook for
security reasons.)
We waivered or ignored every one.
So I wouldn't count on this
inion, it is not until the rear-guard action to stop the use of
new technology has failed, and has seen to have failed, that things will
improve. This has not happened yet, and things are likely to get uglier and
nastier until it does.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
it would be relatively easy for the Internet companies to block the
> Internet address of the Web site without disrupting other traffic.
>
> "It's not a big hassle," Mr. Farber said. "There's no way to stop
> everybody, but a substantial number of
Anyone have confirmation about this ?
Record labels today filed suit in District Court in DC against Verizon,
asking that Verizon be compelled to turn over information regarding their
subscribers under the pre-complaint subpoena power granted under 17 USC
512(h) of the DMCA.
Regards
Marshall
| Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by
> ignorance or stupidity.
>
> Asking the wrong questions is the leading cause of wrong answers
>
> "The best we can hope for concerning the people at large is that they
>
sn't NANOG make a few of its own?
Well, it seems pretty certain that RIAA is doing DOS attacks on the
file sharing systems (by trying to flood them with fake files
masquerading as real MP3's).
I would assume that these are not idle threats.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
>
> A &q
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:43:38 -0400
Peter John Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, August 27, 2002, at 10:41 AM, Joe Baptista wrote:
>
> > Ipv6 uses 128 bits to provide addressing, routing and identification
> > information on a computer. The 128-bits are divided into the left-6
with the people (entities?) you are interacting with.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
Petri Helenius wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>you can go hybrid, like
>>- client connects to server for game playing info (like location on the
>> map, inventory and s
an address in that
> space.
This seems like an unwise overlaying of the IANA-RESERVED space to me.
Why can't IANA allocate itself a /20 (or whatever it needs) and keep
IANA-RESERVED space for unallocated addresses (plus maybe
experimental uses that can and should be filtered at every bord
;s (I like Global Gossip), I connect my Ti-book
to the local ethernet if at all possible (that's why I like Global Gossip) and
use high bit rates (i.e., file transfers) in both direction.
If I was limited to 4 kbps outbound, I would want my money back.
Just one customer viewpoint :)
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 01:48:57 +0200 (CEST)
Iljitsch van Beijnum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> > > Ok, suppose someone can touch type. The world record is something like
> 600
> > > key presses per minute,
Marshall Eubanks
Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
> Nathan,
>
> If your MPEG2 video were multicast streams, wouldn't that be a much more
> effective utilization of bandwidth?
>
> Regards,
> Christopher J. Wolff, CIO
> Broadband Laboratories,
nside your network.
Give me the IP address of a box known to be in 69.1.64.0/20 and
I will try to ping and traceroute to it.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
We did _not_ see 204.106.93.155
here at AS 16517 in our multicast status
runs in either BGP or MBGP announcements - this means that Sprint and
UUNet were not announcing it (nor was Internet2).
--
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
Where are they diverting it to, the Moon (1.5 light seconds away) ?
Really - I have seen some multisecond latencies on network links we were
testing, and I always wondered how these could come to be.
--
Regards
Marshall
to India, for example) satellite paths use two hops
- so you can get 1 second.
(Communications satellites in Molniya orbits are a little higher at apogee, but
you are unlikely to encounter these outside the FSU.)
Of course, it is notorious that TCP requires tuning or proxies to perform well
at high
issues.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
Crist J. Clark wrote:
I've been looking for some technical descriptions on how DirecPC works
from a TCP/IP point of view. Does anyone out there have some
references? I have not been able to find anything too detailed, and
from what I have been told, they are no
results of other people.
>
> Show that it's a FAST connection in certain directions
> some of the time. Lots of burstiness.
Are you talking about burstiness in time or by ip address ?
If the former, do you have statistics on that ?
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
>
> Thank you
information through the network and
blocks alternate routes to prevent data from getting stuck in a loop. The large
volume of data the researcher was uploading happened to be the last drop that
made the network overflow.
Regards
Marshall Eubanks
They didn't have one quote from an actual networking expert. It
does
look like Cisco took the oportunity to sell them some stuff - looks like
someone got something out of this - too bad it wasn't the patients :)
- Dan
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Anyone have any ide
1 - 100 of 312 matches
Mail list logo
