>
> Were it not referenced by http://Relays.OsiruSoft.com./,
It's his own personal block list - it's not meant for use by other
ISP's. Ignore it - unless you really need to send them mail. I don't
know of any other ISP's actually using it as a block list.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 833-3635
n)?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Irwin
>
Here is the map for Ohio:
http://www.puc.state.oh.us/pucogis/STATEMAP/AC_TelServAreaA.pdf
Only 43 ILEC's here...
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 833-3635
'm waiting for them to call and threaten to shut us off - that should
be a fairly humorous conversation.
The network itself was decent. Good connectivity and low latency but I
wouldn't expect it to last much longer.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 833-3635
> I've searched the IANA and ICANN sites, and have found no
> justification
> for what appear to be ARIN allocations to foreign entities within
> 66.231.
>
> Two serious UCE/hacking attempt offenders are as follows:
> 66.231.64.0/20 GIGA-BLK-1
> 66.231.128.0/20 ECON-BLK-1
>
> Why have thes
What is the range of pricing for rack to rack Ethernet crossconnects at
a peering location?
This would be from a colocation rack to a (small local) public peering
point within the building.
Private replies please - I will summarize for the list.
Thanks,
>
> > 3.) Are there any examples of audio feeds that use
> Multicast I can test
> >with?
>
> The University of Oregon makes KWAX (classical radio) available via IP
> multicast; if you are using IP/TV or a compatible client, select the
> session "UO Presents KWAX Classical Radio"), and we also
lawyers think the law says. It's often useful
to point out to the locals that this document exists and that they need
to follow it.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 833-3635
can't expect a
network to renumber everytime they need more space.
I don't have a good answer to this problem nor do I expect one - it's
just another reason why we have additional growth in the routing tables.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 833-3635
Rwhois here reported that the ARIN
recommended server is very difficult (impossible?) to configure to
return the information that ARIN says they want from Rwhois. He gave
up and resorted to SWIP.
I suspect either the server implementation or the instructions need some
help.
--
Mark Rada
the ports on near misses. Direct
strikes and they are toast along with anything attached to them - but
that's just the way it goes :-)
http://www.tessco.com/products/headerProductSearch.do?searchType=1&searchText=300ss&searchField=1
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
419.837.5015
is 1500V for
the magnetics I checked.
Off course all bets are off when lightning strikes since the voltage
tends to be just a tad higher than 1500 volts.
Mark Radabaugh
be metallic
and have a minimum of 10' buried in the ground. This can be hard to
verify on existing installations due to the common use of plastic water
pipe by utilities in recent years. The 5' from the point of entrance is
also due to the common use of plastic water pipe in buildings.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
419.837.5015
rs but I am not having much luck finding contact or setup
information for those providers specific to IPv6.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
419.837.5015
'd have similar changes in a
> single homed statically routed move).
>
> If you don't have multihoming requirements other than availability
> then it really can be fire and forget.
Except for those pesky bogon filters.... which corporations seem to like
to "fire and forget".
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
419.837.5015
Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> But does anyone really know how big WorldCon is/was? First thing
> Verizon will have to do is fire the entire billing department
> and replace them with people/systems that can generate correct
> bills and send them to the correct customers.
Thats right! I forgot that V
Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
Alex Rubenstein wrote:
But does anyone really know how big WorldCon is/was? First thing
Verizon will have to do is fire the entire billing department
and replace them with people/systems that can generate correct
bills
stall mail forwards to AOL customers.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCHjCqg0PQSWMG2wsRAnnfAJ9IE+GIuYnBrDKrE3OlpAvZIuuXbQCfSEAS
GSSlg8c0AHPh044rMDauHyI=
=OjDT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
ly"
Yeah. Sure.
Mark Radabaugh
ting
around waiting for people to come to you can also be pretty expensive if
you have any kind of fixed expenses.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
ut to a $2 Cisco router but for a variety of reasons
| I'm reluctant to follow this path).
|
| Thanks,
|
| Alex
|
Do you need BGP? That's going to make a big difference in what you
want to use. An idea on the number/type of interfaces you need would
be helpful as well.
Mark Rada
ormance hit. I
have blocked Multicast at several points on the network so the problem
should be gone for now. The tcpdump file is at
http://www.amplex.net/images/multicast.cap
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chance Whaley wrote:
| Sorry about that. Didn't look in detail. Saw the UDP port 6257 and
| stopped.
|
| The mcast is coming from someplace upstream from
| fastethernet-0-0.genoa-gw.amplex.net (that is if I did my mcast
| MAC to mcast IP conversion rig
Anyone seeing odd crashes on Lucent PM3's tonight? We have boxes dying all
over the network with hard lockups. The machines are in different physical
locations with different telcos. It smells alot like a DOS of some sort.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635
a lot of work on analysis of BGP
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635
Since the good things so rarely get mentioned...
I would like to publicly thank UUNet's network operations for dealing with a
DOS attack quickly and efficiently yesterday. I am happy to say it only
required one phone call of less than 15 minutes to get the appropriate
filtering in place.
Yep - we are seeing 3 compromised SQL boxes right now.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635
- Original Message -
From: "Avleen Vig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 1:32 AM
Subject: New worm / port 1434?
>
>
http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/02/21/email.encryption.reut/index.html
Very little real information...
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635
meant as a complaint toward Verio - I'm simply trying to decide
why we should go to the added expense of entering our routes in a RADB. To
date I have seen no operational difference between using RADB and not using
it.
My view may very well be distorted by the fact that we are not a transit AS
:-)
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635
g reason to register my
routes in a RADB I will - but at this point I have yet to see it.
What does a RADB tell you about a non-transit network that you can't see
from BGP and WHOIS? There is no more security in RADB than there is in our
current method of notifying our peers of the netblo
> It doesnt cost a million dollars to have access to a RR, its somewhat
less! You
> pay for your domains you pay for your IPs you pay for your ASN you pay for
your
> SSL, so why be shocked you pay a little for this too? And if everyone
filters
> your prefixes that will be operational value enough
> Workarounds and defences already exist, and have been in use for a long
> time.
> Failures in master servers can be mitigated by having several of them;
> simultaneous failure of all master servers can be managed to some
> degree using appropriate SOA timers, so that slave servers provide
> c
they feel like it (and only during normal business
hours). The usual method is to declare no trouble found and close the
ticket (especially if the ticket is approaching 24 hours).
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
Mark Radabaugh wrote:
Dan Hollis wrote:
Does anyone know of a way to send SMS messages without an internet
connection?
Having a network monitoring system send sms pages via email very
quickly runs into chicken-egg scenario. How do you email a page to
let the admins know their net has gone down
en
somebody on our network gets infected with a spam trojan the feedback
loop is pretty helpful in detecting it quickly.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
t we probably would not have
found otherwise.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
net really 218.234.22.221?
> dig @a.root-servers.net k.gtld-servers.net
k.gtld-servers.net. 172800 IN A 192.52.178.30
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
Seems there is a major problem within NewEdge networks this morning.
From the recording on the NOC line it sounds like they lost an internal
database and PVC's at many of the switches.
Anyone know what happened? Let the speculation begin :-)
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
Joe Shen wrote:
Hi,
Is there any tool to monitor BGP route stablity?
thanks
Joe
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Log on to Messenger with your mobile phone!
http://sg.messenger.yahoo.com
http://www.renesys.com. Gradus is pretty effective.
Mark Radabaugh
ng ways in 2 days though the cost may
not be exactly pretty.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635
but I suspect that Verislime is now leaving expired domain
in the GTLD servers until they reach the redemption period in the hope that
people will not notice the domain not resolving until it reaches the
extortion period.
Why are we still putting up with this garbage from Verisign and ICANN?
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635
hy is
your/my virus scanner not working?' questions.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635
Original Message -
From: "Owen DeLong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: Annoying dynamic DNS updates (was Re: someone from attbi please
contact me ...)
> Think about Micr0$0ft trying to fight off thous
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Loftis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 2:47 PM
Subject: Massive sprintlink problems?
>
> Anyone else seeing this:: (1sec+ delay to my idle DSL line across
> sprintlink...)
>
> traceroute is definitely t
sign - now is the time to
slink home with your tail between your legs. Keep fanning the flames any
you might find out that this 'vocal minority' is capable of creating
considerable blowback.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635
keeping the traffic off
of your dedicated line.
Whether your DSL provider has the resources to sink the traffic may be
another matter -- but they are at least in a position to help you and
(since you are paying them) have an interest in dealing with you.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635
an principle of Verisign.Just more of the PR
machine on a roll.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635
This is interesting:
Dear Valued Network Solutions® Customer,
Today VeriSign, Inc. announced that it has entered into a definitive
agreement to sell Network Solutions to a new entity formed by Pivotal
Private Equity.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635
begin 666 clear.gif
K1TE
> >So...correct me if I'm wrong here...does this mean that the registry
> services
> >operations and the GTLD maintenance operations for .com/.net will be
> owned by
> >different companies?
>
> Yep. And it means that Verisign business is no longer
> based so much on serving customers but more on l
http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0310/network.html has "To watch the meeting live,
check the links on the main conference page. " - the link is bad.
The real real feed is at ???
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635
Anyone know if GammaNetworking is black/whitehat
(http://www.gammanetworking.com)? I don't find much on them but they are
supporting at least one spam gang and unresponsive to inquiries.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635
ternet will not be able to talk to
other networks due to policy and peering decisions made by the various
providers. Providers that do not provide access to the majority of the
Internet usually find they loose market share quickly - this tends to be
self correcting in fairly short order.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
(419) 720-3635
his
> to the DNS operations mailing list run by the ISC OARC?
>
> Gadi.
Let's see - a description of an interesting way to use DNS metrics to
detect network abuse - network abuse that routinely causes headaches on
our network and results in customer complaints. Seems pre
hey
won't understand is pointless. We either help them clean up the mess or
refer them to someone who can.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
419.837.5015
of WCG, so calling them for info
>would have been pointless...
>
As a customer we were not able to get through to L3 on the phone.
Apparently prefix filtering wasn't working so well either given that AS27251
was
managing to announce 38/8, 64/8 and 67/8 with L3 happily passing it along.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
419.837.5015
o (or more) of anything, if there's one button somewhere that
turns it all off?
Seems like the EPO should be a logical AND with the fire alarm system -
it only works AFTER you have an existing fire alarm in the building.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
419.837.5015 x21
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
his working from a legal standpoint though.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
419.837.5015 x21
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joe Greco wrote,
There are lots of things that could heavily stress your upload channel.
Things I've seen would include:
1) Sending a bunch of full-size pictures to all your friends and family,
which might not seem too bad until it's a gig worth of 8-megapixel
photos and 30 recipients, a
I would be much happier creating a torrent server at the data center
level that customers could seed/upload from rather than doing it over
the last mile. I don't see this working from a legal standpoint though.
Why not? There's plenty of perfectly legal P2P content out there.
Hum.
P2P based CDN's are a current buzzword; Verilan even has a white paper
on it
https://www.verisign.com/cgi-bin/clearsales_cgi/leadgen.htm?form_id=9653&toc=e20050314159653020&ra=72.219.222.192&email=
Password protected link.
I think we are going to see a lot more of this, and not just f
Geo. wrote:
The vast majority of our last-mile connections are fixed wireless. The
design of the system is essentially half-duplex with an adjustable
ratio between download/upload traffic.
This in a nutshell is the problem, the ratio between upload and
download should be 1:1 and if it w
Joe Greco wrote:
As long as you fairly disclose to your end-users what limitations and
restrictions exist on your network, I don't see the problem.
You've set out a qualification that generally doesn't exist. For example,
this discussion included someone from a WISP, Amplex, I believe, t
Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I'm also looking forward to the pricing, all the per-byte plans I have
seen so far makes the ISP look extremely greedy by overpricing, as
opposed to "we want to charge fairly for use" that is what they say in
their press statements.
I see it more as an experiment
ice that the mail server SMTP
port is 587 and authentication is turned on? Why do they mess with it?
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
419.837.5015 x21
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x27;s the way it is or finally fix the
problem. Either way the customer is lost to you 'cause they won't come
back even after they figure out it was their problem in the first place.
Shutting them off causes churn, leaving problems silently in place also
causes churn. The middle ro
Randy Bush wrote:
No transition plan
Declared victory before the hard part even started
No real long term plan
No realistic estimation of costs
No real support for the folk on the front lines
Victory will be next month
Describes:
a - The war in Iraq
b - DNSsec
c - IPv6
d - All of the ab
every month since the T1 circuit was
installed about 8 months ago.
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
66 matches
Mail list logo
