exist every time the concept is
mentioned from now until eternity, just like they do now.
Right now, on July 5th 2005, "The whole alternate-root ${STATE}horse"
has absolutely zero operational impact on any network operators.
So could y'all please perh
t someone at the Port Authority has made a
unilateral decision to shut off the cells, and now if there -is- a
real emergency nobody can call 911.
Breathtaking.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Network Engineer Email:
highlights packet
loss, congestion, unreachability, etc.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Network Engineer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (H)
Internode Systems Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Ma
any bogon filtering, can you please check your border ACLs
and BGP prefix filters to ensure that you're no longer preventing
access to 58.0.0.0/8 or 59.0.0.0/8 ?
Thanks,
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Network Engineer
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 11:51:40AM +1030, Mark Newton wrote:
> If you run any bogon filtering, can you please check your border ACLs
> and BGP prefix filters to ensure that you're no longer preventing
> access to 58.0.0.0/8 or 59.0.0.0/8 ?
Further to this:
If anyone from
m without any further thought. Even some Serious Blue-Chip
Multinationals appear to have professional Network Security divisions
who really should know better, but don't. It's a real eye-opener.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Netwo
x27;d appreciate it.
Thanks,
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Network Engineer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (H)
Internode Systems Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:38:00PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> So much for any sort of journalistic ethic, fact checking, or, unbiased
> reporting.
Schneier isn't a journalist or reporter; He's a security vendor.
- mark
--
Mark Newton
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 06:06:22AM +, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
> -- Mark Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 10:38:00PM -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > > So much for any sort of journalistic ethic, fact checking, or, unbiased
> &g
names in non-English alphabets.
Perhaps then you can tell what to look for in a string of Kanji symbols
which might be suggestive of the concept of "static".
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Network Engineer Email:
are going to get the hint and stop using SSN's as ID
> numbers..
Around about whenever the US Federal Government gets the hint and
passes a bill which makes it illegal to use social security numbers
for any purpose other than the administration of social securit
etails are on the
website referenced above.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Network Engineer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (H)
Internode Systems Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
site descriptions, etc)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Network Engineer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (H)
Internode Systems Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
problem is -easy-, it's just plainly obvious to me that
it'll need to be solved anyway, and the IPv6 PA advocacy that
keeps coming up seems to be an exercise in denial...)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Network Engineer
network smaller
than 254 hosts and it hasn't made a lick of difference to
universal reachability.
What's to stop someone who wants to carry around less prefixes from
saying, "Bugg'rit, I'm not going to accept anything smaller than
a /18"?
- mark
--
Mark Newton
ver that the race to $0 for IP transit prices has created
a world in which they make more money by selling their IPv4 addresses
than they make by selling Internet access? Will we see them coming
out as a strong supporter of restrictive RIR policies and IPv6
technologies whi
ear 4523.
("Hey, guys, you're all using these CIDR blocks which have real
monetary value, how about you all agree to deploy this technology
which will make them all valueless again? Huh? Hello? Anyone
listening? Where'd everyone go?")
- mark
--
Mark Newton
transit.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Network Engineer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (H)
Internode Systems Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 09:39:50AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Mark Newton:
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 07:58:48AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > > (I've wondered for quite some time if "net neutrality" implies that
> > > Ebay or Goog
. Regardless of any
retail restrictions, the fact still remains that your local
Cable company is selling connectivity to other peoples'
autonomous systems.
That's transit.
And that's what eBay and Google don't sell.
- mark
--
Mark Newton
, it'll get improved. It'll
keep getting better until we don't need it anymore (or forever,
whichever comes first)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Network Engineer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (H)
Internode
boptimal solutions create their own new problems. If
you believe that v4 exhaustion is a pressing problem, then I'd
humbly suggest that 2007 is a good time to shut the hell up about
how bad NAT is and get on with fixing the most pressing problem.
If we're successful, there'll be plent
where you only get to
deploy new IPv4 applications when the powers that be permit you to.
So everyone will deploy IPv6 applications, which require no ALGs,
instead.
Isn't that a solution that everyone can be happy with?
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 09:50:09PM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 2-okt-2007, at 16:55, Mark Newton wrote:
> >So everyone will deploy IPv6 applications, which require no ALGs,
> >instead.
> >Isn't that a solution that everyone can be happy with?
>
&g
'll be plenty of time to go back and
> >re-evaluate NAT afterwards when IPv6 exhaustion is a distant memory.
>
> Right. Building something that can't meet reasonable requirements
> first and then getting rid of the holes worked so well for the email
> spam pro
o existing ones) if they
> >care about the protocols in question because they have no choice --
> >security is the law.
>
> Seems to work well, that law.
>
> But these people don't complain when their video streaming/chatting
> doesn't work out
er example of you proposing that we all
behave like old-skool telcos inside the exact same 24 hour period
when you decry any suggestion that we act like old-skool telcos.
Whatever.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Network Engineer
duopoly, e.g.,
http://www.pipenetworks.com/docs/media/ASX_07_08_09%20Runway%20Update%204%20-%20BSa.pdf
I suspect we're going to have an interesting few years.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Network Engineer Email
, as much as your marketplace derides
caps and quotas, I'm pretty sure that most of you would prefer to do
business with my constraints than with yours.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Network Engineer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (H)
Internode Systems Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
x27;s shaped your perspective of what "reasonable" is. It's
completely delusional of you to insist that the rest of the world
follow the same definition of "reaosnable", *ESPECIALLY* when the rest
of the world is subsidizing your domestic Internet by paying for
t
industry?
Be warned that the industry is already full of sharks who don't know what
they're talking about, and if what you suggest happens to match the business
model deployed by one of those guys who has subsequently gone broke, I
reserve the right to point and laugh derisively.
Y
worksite. Ouch.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (H)
Internode Systems Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
y want to pay more for more
quota. Bytecounts are retrieved via SNMP (for business customers)
or Radius (for DSL, dial, ISDN, etc).
When transit is costing $250 per megabit per month, there aren't
many other options.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTE
paper isn't trailblazing, and every issue you can
think
of to explain why it'll be horrible and won't work has already been
demolished
by real-life day-to-day business in other countries. You guys who are
behaving as if the sky will fall are going to have to explain why th
PPC-1 shakes the market
up next year. We're looking forward to it.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (H)
Internode Systems Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
&q
st any terms
whatsoever if it means they can reduce or elminiate their financial
commitments to the other four.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (H)
Internode Systems Pt
ainable. You guys might think they're a novel and
unwelcome arrival at the moment, but give it a few years and we'll
see what happens :-)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
[EMAIL PR
On 22/01/2008, at 10:21 AM, Tom Vest wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008, at 6:10 PM, Mark Newton wrote:
It goes a bit deeper than that when the monopoly can compound the
problem my artificially constraining capacity by underspending on
infrastructure (e.g., only lighting one pair on a multi-pair cable
imit?
Here's a question for you:
Power is metered. Water is metered. Gas is metered. Heating
oil is metered. Even cable-TV is packaged so that you pay more
if you want to use more channels...
... what economic fundamentals exist to suggest that Internet
access should be the _only_ domest
ffering a package that
fits your needs in a competitive environment.
In my observation, customers who are repeatedly DDOS'ed are usually
doing something to provoke it. I don't think I've ever seen an instance
where a DDOS'ed customer has had a repeat occurrance
Doesn't really work, does it?)
Politicians have succeeded in watering down the definition of the word
"terrorism" to the point where it no longer has any meaning. But we're
rational adults, not politicians, right? If we can't get it right,
who will?
- mark
--
Mark Newton
of making rtconfig work properly in various
situations (heck, do people still use that? Does it even do IPv6
right?)
Yeah, we use it. And (following a bunch of patches we made a couple
of months ago) we've convinced it to do IPv6 too.
- mark
--
Mark Newton
g to happen in this space,
my guess is that it'll be with custom Linux firmware running on
a LinkSys blob with no vendor support.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(W)
Network Engineer Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (H)
In
hen you're finished.
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Network Engineer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (H)
Internode Systems Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
> have to pay for also.
Sounds great. We won't all have to move to IPv6 after all!
- mark :-)
--
Mark Newton Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (W)
Network Engineer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (H)
Internode Systems Pty Ltd
45 matches
Mail list logo
