not only have an outcry, you'll have a target for legal action
(restraint of trade?). That kind of thing needs government level
action. It's highly unlikely to happen, and it's far from clear that
we would want it to.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagegate.com/ Enterprise Messaging
At 2:26 PM -0500 11/5/04, Mark Jeftovic wrote:
had AOL tarpitting gotten quite a bit more aggressive in the last
few days?
One of the sites I run (hosted on cihost) recently started getting
bad SMTP responses from AOL. We worked around by routing AOL and
Compuserver mail through a gateway that c
't a standard format for the returned
information between providers.
The whois database is not a replacement for a DNS query.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not s
sks, never mind the increase in spam) are also broken
by other TLDs that use wildcards. The issues weren't clear because
the impact was small. Now that they are clear, those decisions
should also be revisited.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Sp
bly they figured out the answer to this problem and have code
samples available for distribution. However I get the feeling from
their press releases that they've forgotten there is more to the
internet than just the web.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Gen
Although Verisign ought to be
describing all of these techniques. But depending on the
circumstances I primarily need to check for A records or MX and A
records.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on T
NAME's,
multiple A records and all of that in the future.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
respo
At 10:24 AM -0400 9/24/03, John A. Martin wrote:
>>>>> "Kee" == Kee Hinckley
"RE: Detecting a non-existent domain"
Tue, 23 Sep 2003 20:16:04 -0400
Kee> At 3:15 PM -0700 9/23/03, David Schwartz wrote:
>> How would you do this before? Does a
pursue them. I doubt even the big
ISPs recover their cost--their goal seems to be deterrence. However
I'd be happy to donate somewhere.com's bogus inbound traffic (we
bounced ten million messages last year, definitely looking at more
than twenty million this year) to the ca
he user
to know not to open that, but to know that the notification from
their ISP about their machine being infected is legit?
They either need to be contacted out of band, or their email software
needs to support a secure channel of communications that they can
really trust.
--
Ke
ommon enough, then the virus writers would just simulate messages
from it and disable the real one.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that p
#x27;d never been formally cursed before. Sure beats a DoS attack.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
respo
ign's site is helpful. Mark McLaughlin is a former
lawyer who moved into Marketing and Biz Development (Caere, Gemplus,
Signio and then Verisign payments).
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Tech
so insecurely and with
such poor customer service that we all ran quickly to other
registrars). Certainly it would be good to counter their public
image, but it probably should be done separately from this issue.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
h
er to ICANN regarding Verisign" was an
excellent example of the kind of thing that might be done.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: tha
me off the
net.
Just rejected another 10,000 connection attempts as I wrote this.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unw
;s scoring system. Sometime's that's the only way
we've been able to reliably detect a spammer.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more
return the same value as badxxxdomain.TLD?
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for thei
th set to yahoo,
that can be a problem.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their
IPSEC, and if that support includes support for multiple
clients. The NAT box has to keep track of the mapping. I've seen
NATs priced based on how many VPN clients they support at a time.
See http://www.dslreports.com/faq/4638
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Gener
int just became moot.
Versign is selling the registry business. Network Solutions is being
spun off. They retain the back end DNS.
http://www.verisign.com/corporate/news/2003/pr_20031016.html?sl=070805
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
h
either can Verisign, they are renaming the REGISTRY.
"This Registry business was recently renamed VeriSign Naming and
Directory Services"
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Societ
ure they'll go back to seeing browser-specific
pages when new browsers are released. In fact it seems likely to me
that *all* browser manufacturers are going to start providing similar
services, now that Verisign's pointed out how lucrative it is. If
web browsers star
different features with different behaviors. What works for one
won't necessarily work for another. And every time any one of them
changes, or a new registry is added, every single piece of software
that relies on a particular behavior has to be checked and possibly
patched. We ca
ad of after
deployment.
:-)
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling to accept
responsibility for their own actions, or
perl/5.65"
68.63.88.173 - - [21/Oct/2003:19:47:49 -0500] "GET /Pad-Files HTTP/1.1" 404
322
"-" "libwww-perl/5.65"
That's VeriSign's new spell corrector DNS wildcard.
:-)
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
http
e me that
non-ISP companies are starting to look at the same kind of things.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messagefire.com/ Next Generation Spam Defense
http://commons.somewhere.com/buzz/ Writings on Technology and Society
I'm not sure which upsets me more: that people are so unwilling t
nload early next
week. We do not have exact details yet but we can tell you now that
each router's firmware that incorporates Parental Control as an
option will be changed.
Please expect more detailed information to follow early next week. Thank you.
--
Kee Hinckley
http://www.messa
On Feb 4, 2008, at 4:29 AM, Alex Pilosov wrote:
This conversation is quickly spinning into discussion of politics and
terrorism.
Reminder to all, please stick to the *operational* aspects of this
thread.
In all the fuss about terrorism, people may be forgetting that the
terrorists have g
http://www.frozenreality.co.uk/comic/bunny/index.php?id=1094
On Dec 5, 2006, at 10:14 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
The "study" says that "nearly 20 percent of email does not get
delivered to
the inbox as intended, largely because it gets mistaken as spam."
That's utter hogwash. My Mail Mailguard statistics this year show
that for
me personally,
31 matches
Mail list logo