On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Sam Crooks wrote:
Can anyone point me in the direction of a source for fiber cable
installations correlated to GIS data?
You will probably have difficulty in getting this from your carriers of
choice. Chances are, if they provide anything at all, it would be done
under
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Sam Crooks wrote:
Can anyone point me in the direction of a source for fiber cable
installations correlated to GIS data?
You will probably have difficulty in getting this from
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, David Conrad wrote:
If you can justify a /8, ARIN will allocate one to you (not that I speak for
ARIN or anything, but that's how things work). Presumably Softbank BB
justified the /8 APNIC allocated to them.
I don't know about APNIC, but ARIN's rules are generally struc
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
I had said elsewhere this was unprecedented but was then pointed at 73.0.0.0/9,
73.128.0.0/10 which is Comcast assigned in April. I'm surprised none of these
assignemtns have shown up on mailing lists..
I suspect this was done on the condition that
On Fri, 12 Aug 2005, Greenhagen, Robin wrote:
Does anyone else require HICAP loop installs to be after hours? What
experiences have you had (good or bad) with getting the carriers to do
their work during off-peak hours for a reasonable fee?
We've done off-hours turnups before, at my previous
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
Some of this is on topic. Internet access is as important as the
lights or water being on. Right, get out, but it'll be good
to see reasonable updates on what's going on utilities wise
down there when the weather shifts.
I'm sure other infrastructu
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Crist Clark wrote:
AFAIK, it is still required, but my own experience has been that some do,
some do only in preparation for their next IP space request (i.e. fall behind
on swips, then to a big catch-up before approaching ARIN for more space), and
some just don't. I hav
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, Steve Gibbard wrote:
Sometimes, they've gone on to repeat the lack of documentation followed by a
mad scramble a time or two, but the lesson generally gets learned eventually.
Agreed. That sort of record-keeping seems to come over time as part of
the evolution of an ISP
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3 men die in weekend crashes
While tragic, how is this even *remotely* on-topic for this list?
jms
On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Edward Lewis wrote:
Their rwhois seems to be terminally down. Can we reclaim 4/8 from them now?
Who is "we?"
IANA says it belongs to BBN (ARIN not mentioned):
http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space
004/8 Dec 92 Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc.
4/8 is most
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Vicky Rode wrote:
Just trying to get some clarity and direction regarding obtaining
address space/ASN for my client.
Is there a minimum address space (?) an entity would need to justify to
go directly to RIR (ARIN in this case) as opposed to the upstream
provider? Is /20 t
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Jeff Shultz wrote:
Matthew Crocker wrote:
While I realize that the "nuke survivable" thing is probably an old wives
tale, it seems ridiculous that "the Internet" can't adjust by routing any
packets that used to go directly from Cogent to Level 3 though some 3rd (and)
4t
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Todd Vierling wrote:
On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Matthew Crocker wrote:
This comes down to a little more than just "depeering" -- at least in the
BGP sense. There's active route filtering going on as well if connectivity
is dead; after all, I can bet the house that at least one of
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I meet the Multihoming requirement, which means I can get a block as
small as a /22, which is about right for my needs. Are there still any
concerns about networks (as Verio and Sprint have done in the past)
filtering out longer prefixes, and if
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005, Todd Vierling wrote:
That's the operators' view, but not the customer's.
The customer wants redundancy.
That's why SLAs exist.
SLAs exist to provide a means of allowing a vendor to 'feel your pain'
when you experience some type of a service outage. They generally do n
On Fri, 28 Oct 2005, Flint Barber wrote:
What are the real gotchas for changing ASNs that people have run
into? There is a minor one in terms of route-registry timeliness, I can't
update RADB until the change takes place and ISPs don't run their update
scripts on my timetable. So I see
I've been tasked with evaluating cable management software systems for my
employer. I work for a large university with 30-35,000 phones and roughly as
many computers spread across 100+ buildings in 5 campuses, with substantial
copper, coax, and fiber plants.
That said, I'm much more interested
On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Anybody here *NOT* seen cases where the 2 fibers leave the building on opposite
sides, go down different streets - and rejoin 2 miles down the way because
there's only one convenient bridge/tunnel/etc over the river, or similar?)
Sure, quite often in fa
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
One might wonder if Qwest is a little upset about being
rebuffed by MCI in its efforts to merge the two companies.
http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/11426726.htm
Smells like sour grapes to me
jms
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
That may be, but they are right.
If Qwest would have won the bid, then it would be up to Verizon to cry
foul - and rest assured they would. Funny how that works :-)
Do you think anyone will benefit from Verizon+MCI? After this merger, the
incumbent IL
On Wed, 18 May 2005, Stephen Fulton wrote:
Occasionaly clients connected via ATM PVC's experience packet loss after
reconnecting due to power loss. The line sync is fine, but packet loss of
between 40 - 60% occurs. Only once I've used "clear sub " to
disconnect the session does the packet loss
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Joe Abley wrote:
The NANOG list administrators can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] That
is almost certainly a better place to send comments related to the AUP than
the this list.
(I would have kept this comment to private mail except that it seems possible
that a public
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Randy Bush wrote:
i have a few routers of various flavors spewing netflow data.
currently i use flowtools, and get text reports via email.
but they're s 20th century.
what will accept flow data from the routers and give me a sexy
web page or two showing the elephant app
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
That being said, the 'new ATT' with all those assets will need to be
integrated, and work efficiently. Turf battles will ensue. Tens of
Integration, going on past experience, is highly unlikely. The last time
I had any interaction with Worldcom r
On Wed, 3 May 2006, Shane Owens wrote:
Can anyone give me any suggestions as to what routes to take to
troubleshoot this? Logic tell me that is I have reach ability and one
browser work but another doesn't it's a software problem with either the
browser or the site, but being able to take the
If you know where I could lay my hands on a few (5 at most) 5 meter
multimode duplex LC-LC jumpers in the Pittsburgh, PA area, please shoot me
a note off-list.
Thanks
jms
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, Jeff Shultz wrote:
Thus explainith why CEOs should not be responsible for this. I wonder if
their CIOs or other techies have ever tried to explain the concept of a
"CERT" to them.
Of course they have. Gives you minty fresh breath, right?
jms
On Mon, 26 Jun 2006, MARLON BORBA wrote:
A friend of mine told me about a new "breed" of routers from Cisco
which have two "virtual machines" over the same physical hardware --
sort of a VMWare or Xen host with guests.
Does someone know about that, or had a practical experience with that
ne
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Christian Nielsen wrote:
20 - 30 years ago, Air Conditioning in a house was more of a luxury. For
us, it was a Swamp Cooler. Most new houses today are built with AC and
it is becoming standard practice to install them on older houses. So the
load on the system will only get
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, John van Oppen wrote:
we don't run one either... :)
The last person I know who was running one, was in the proccess of killing it.
I used to run one, but haven't, since about 2000 :) The provider i worked
for at the time got out of the game and outsourced news because
Sorry to reply to my own post, but after reading further into this thread,
I saw that my estimation of "substantially higher than 350 GB/day" shows
how long I've been out of the business of driving large news servers :)
jms
On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Mike Walter wrote:
I normally would not post to the group, but I am 100% stumped and have
talked with peers with no luck.
I have (2) Cisco 7204 Routers running BGP with 3 peers and HSRP. I am
not doing anything special with BGP, pretty much a default config that
has not ch
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Mike Walter wrote:
Thanks for everyone's great input. Here are answers to Justin's
questions.
#1 - 12.3.6a - 7204VXR (NPE400) 512MB - 200+ MB free
#2 - 12.2.15T5 - cisco 7204VXR (NPE225) - 256MB (I have a NPE400 - 512MB
I want to swap in) - 23MB Free (Issue?)
Full Routes
The complaint was, at best, an entertaining read. IANAL.
As was mentioned earlier, it looks like Kremen's whole case is built on a
number of false assumptions:
1. Netblocks are the property of the organization once their assignment
request is approved by ARIN or other RIR.
Since this is f
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Chris Jester wrote:
IP addresses appear to be property - - read http://news.findlaw.com/
hdocs/docs/cyberlaw/kremencohen72503opn.pdf. Given that domain names
are property, IP addresses should be property, especially in
California where are constitution states "All things o
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me that this nicely illustrates a major problem with the
current system. Here we have large blocks of IP space that, by their
own rules, ARIN should take back. It all sounds nice on paper, but
clearly there is a hole in the system wher
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
(I remember two guys with VERY LONG screwdrivers poking a live transfer
switch to get it to reset properly, and was told to step back 20 feet as
thats how far they expected to get thrown if they did something wrong).
(I also remember them resetting
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Deepak Jain wrote:
Sounds like a DHS/FBI investigation will be starting soon.
Eesh.. if we start having to secure 500,000 route miles of fiber routes
against sabotage, um... well, I guess I'll have to become a fiber
installation contractor. :)
That and carriers will ha
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007, Andy Davidson wrote:
Is it not possible to require that each of your suppliers provide over a
specified path ? I'm planning a build-out that will require a diverse path
between two points, and one supplier has named two routes, and promised that
they wont change for the
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
And the 7600 is a router?
:)
I thought it was just a 6500 that sommeone got drunk and tipped over on
it's side, like a cow...
I still needle my Cisco rep about that from time to time. IMHO, the
6500/7600 split was one of the dumbest, most poorly
Note that telcos are not immune to shoddy cabling/installation work.
The link below is from a dial/T1 POP at I place I worked in several years
ago.
In case the detail is hard to make out, the paper sign taped to the ladder
says "DO NOT MOVE LADDER".
The background is that Bell Atlantic mou
On Mon, 10 Sep 2007, Warren Kumari wrote:
One of the places where I worked had a bunch of networking gear and around
12x1U servers all squeezed into a shower stall There was a cardboard sign
hanging from the faucet saying "WARNING!!! Do not turn on"
Not too far from the dial POP I mentio
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Scott Weeks wrote:
It was brought to my attention that some of the folks here may not have
ever seen good wiring, so I snapped a few photos of good wiring here and
wrote a quickie web page for the photos. I couldn't get pictures of
Ethernet wiring, but it's the same. Ex
On Wed, 12 Sep 2007, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, David Lesher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
If you find any pictures of NY.NET; Terry Kennedy made the above
look sloppy. Many places ban cable ties due to the sharp ends;
I believe the pictures in question are here:
http://www.tmk.com/p
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007, Deepak Jain wrote:
Is this a 7 hour outage a comment on rural Central Texas availability of
fiber splicers or novel ways fiber gets cut?
Anytime you talk about "rural" I'm impressed with 7 hours, however -- isn't
SONET supposed to make this better?
Sure, if:
1. the pro
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Hex Star wrote:
Why is it that the US has ISP's with either no quotas or obscenely high ones
while countries like Australia have ISP's with ~12gb quotas? Is there some
kind of added cost running a non US ISP?
Depending upon the country you're in, that is a possibility. So
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Andy Johnson wrote:
In my experience, the support cost of DSL is significantly cheaper than
dial-up in terms of helpdesk calls. DSL/Cable/FiOS is typically a plug and
play, where as dialup can be quite a bit more troublesome, involving more
tech time in the long run.
I occ
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a client that wants us to advertise an IP block assigned by another
ISP. I know that the best practice is to have them request an AS number
from ARIN and peer with us, etc. However, I cannot find any information
that states as law. Does any
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That brings up an interesing point. My biggest fear was that one of my
other customers could possible be closer to me that the ISP that provides
the primary link and it would cause them to favor the backup link because
of AS path. I think they are
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
It's not 'law' per se, but having the customer originate their own
announcements is definitely the Right Way to go.
That is not at all guaranteed.
I never said it was. My experience, both in my previous life as the
operator of a regional ISP a
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please elaborate. My knowledge of IPv6 is admittedly lacking, but I
always assumed that the routing tables would be much larger if the
internet were to convert from IPv4 due to the sheer number of networks
available.
Not many networks are pushing
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, David Conrad wrote:
Others have indicated that such filters (assuming they exist) will not last
in the face of paying customers presenting longer than /24 prefixes for
routing. Specifically, that ISPs will relax their filters (allowing longer
than /24) in order to get the
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Jon Lewis wrote:
adopted /24 as the cutoff point. If you make the cutoff point smaller,
what is the new point... /26? /32?
Anything longer than /24 is unlikely to propogate far on the internet. You
can all check your filters to see. I just checked mine, and neither L
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
If you went ahead and did this, the more specific route being announced by
you on behalf of your customer would be more likely to attract traffic back
to you. Prefix length is checked in the BGP route selection process before
AS path length. Thi
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Justin, if Provider A _has_ permission from Provider B to announce a prefix,
do you believe Provider A should be allowed to announce the prefix?
As long as all of the relevant parties know about it and are OK with it,
that's fine. It's just not
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Stephen Fulton wrote:
A good friend of mine swears that Autocad is superior for network design to
Visio. I don't disagree, but only because I have never used Autocad for
network design. So far Visio has generally met my needs when I'm working on
a design, but I have fou
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Chris Owen wrote:
You can't consider every wacko on the net when doing something like this.
Anyone who considers a ping an attack probably isn't worth worrying about.
I tend to agree, but back when I manned the abuse desk (among others) at
my former employer, I would see
emails, rather than just relying on the
boilerplate reports many of the packages above commonly send out. I felt
honored :)
jms
Justin M. Streiner wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Chris Owen wrote:
You can't consider every wacko on the net when doing something like
this. Anyone who consid
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Trent Lloyd wrote:
Yeh I get these as well.
I know the list admins and people from Merit are looking into why this is
happening, so we'll see what they come up with. At this point it's
probably not necessary for other folks to post "me-too"s to the list.
jms
On 07/1
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Drew Weaver wrote:
Hi there, I just had a real quick question. I hope this is found to be
on topic.
Is it to be expected to see rfc1918 src'd packets coming from transit
carriers?
I would recommend grilling your carriers to find out why they're not
dropping packets s
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
A practical question here: does anyone know offhand if 4km reach is
adequate for interbuilding access (i.e., DC[124] to DC3) access at
Equinix Ashburn, including worst-case interior wiring and cross
connects? I'm thinking that's cutting it close.
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007, Leigh Porter wrote:
Stasiniewicz, Adam wrote:
I am 99.9% sure that after successfully hosting websites for Al-Qaeda
for over 3 years (on US based servers, by US citizens, living in the US)
they are not going to care much about some SSH port scan.
Isn't this what you fol
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Justin Shore wrote:
I'm sure all of us have parts of the Internet that we block for one reason or
another. I have existing methods for null routing traffic from annoying
hosts and subnets on our border routers today (I'm still working on a network
blackhole). However I'
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Frank wrote:
all the AS numbers are the same
Are you running this trace from a BGP speaking router on your network?
I'm also going to guess you're not taking full BGP routes from your
upstreams?
What exactly do you think is broken?
As for the dropped traceroute probe
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Justin Shore wrote:
Do you block any customer-facing egress traffic at all? What about ingress?
SMTP, NetBIOS, MS-SQL, common proxy ports (3128, 6588)?
What ICMP types do you allow or disallow?
In my previous life, I worked at a mid-sized ISP. A common practice for
br
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
A friend of mine who works for a company that owns another company that sells
consumer CPE said "Well, this is a volume business. Why release a feature
that isn't being demanded much yet, when we could do it later and sell you
ANOTHER CPE to rep
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, David Conrad wrote:
There are already things like http://ipv6.google.com/,
True, since yesterday. However, while I applaud their efforts, Google is
still primarily a search engine. How much of the content Google serves up is
accessible via IPv6? I might suggest reviewi
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008, ann kok wrote:
I have this problem about mtu mismatch
Some DSL clients, some are working fine.
(browsing...ping ...)
Some DSL clients have this problem
they can't browse the sites.
they can ssh the host but couldn't run the command in
the shell prompt
ping packet are work
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008, Frank Bulk - iNAME wrote:
So perhaps the question isn't so much how many kW's I can pack into a 42U
rack, but for the data center designer, what's the best price point if real
estate is not a significant issue. Or to say it another way, what kW
density per rack will give m
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
they have ~6% of the employees of the employees of say verizon and slightly
less than the 123 years of cruft that the later has.
Verizon is one company in name only. There are so many groups and
business units, all with their own inbound numbers and
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's insulting
when you trim the message to a shorter statement that you are
responding to. The other 18 lines may not have been important to this
particular response but they were not content free.
If your content was in any way, interesting, th
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006, Robert Boyle wrote:
You should also create a bogons list for your BGP routes which you
accept from your upstream. Block all RFC1918 space and unassigned
public addresses too. Just keep on top of it when new allocations are
put into
On Thu, 9 Nov 2006, Donald Stahl wrote:
Sorry I have to agree with Steve as well. I know I've left networks with
Bogon lists in place and then gotten calls a year or more later asking why
traffic can't isn't coming in from XYZ new client. Turns out the new admin
never updated the bogon list.
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, J. Oquendo wrote:
Anyone seeing issues for GBLX around NY?
Do you have traceroutes or other useful data to illustrate said
broken-ness?
jms
This little piece will be top-posted, but everthing else will be inline.
I'm also going to trim the pieces that I won't be responding to *gasp*!
Please don't shoot me - comments are inline ;-)
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Edward Lewis wrote:
I'm not going to pick on the "it's" (grammatically correct,
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Scott Morris wrote:
Works fine for me.
And a 403 Forbidden is a web server error, not a resolution error if I
remember right.
Correct. Someone made a boo-boo on some component of www.cisco.com, i.e.
changed a chunk of the web server configuration or broke the permission
On Thu, 4 Jan 2007, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind wrote:
25 11.11.11.2 44 msec
26 11.11.11.1 48 msec
27 11.11.11.2 48 msec
28 11.11.11.1 48 msec
Yep. Way cool.
Unfortunately it's not the first time that:
1) someone with enable screwed up a routing design or did something dumb
like dueling static
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, John Smith wrote:
my organization is considering PI addresses as a way to multihost.
Having read the archives regarding disadvantages and alternatives,
my question is how big a network must one have to be reasonably
sure the BGP routers will accept the route?
A /24 is the
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Aaron Glenn wrote:
Just the other night I was trolling marketing materials for various
lit services from a number of providers and I ran across what I found
to be an interesting PDF from the ol' SBC (can't find it at the
moment). It was a government services product briefin
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Jason Arnaute wrote:
Yes, that's what I am saying - one pipe only, and if
it goes down, I go down.
Ok, so it sounds like they're doing MPLS or some sort of policy routing
to force your traffic out one of their transit providers. I've seen other
providers do this. Is th
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Todd Christell wrote:
Sorry if this is OT but we are having a discussion with our HR
department. We are in the process of getting a 24 X 7 NOC in place and
HR has a problem with calling them NOC Specialist. What is the
generally accepted title?
Not sure why your HR dept
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Simon Lyall wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
Not sure why your HR dept would even care :)
So they can look them up on a pay scale list and decide what they should be
paid.
In pretty much every place I've worked, the pay scale was set b
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
- Technical Support Representative
- Network Administrator
- Senior Network Administrator
Or, you could just call them all "booger eaters" and be done with it.
"Booger Eater (I/II/III/IV) just doesn't look good on a business card :)
"N
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Joe Abley wrote:
Almost ALL?
Surely all those except those who are competing with you for the same
customers should multi-home. :-)
True :) I'd also think (read: hope) if an organization was located in an
area where multi-homing was not possible, then that organizati
On Sat, 17 Mar 2007, Brandon Galbraith wrote:
True :) I'd also think (read: hope) if an organization was located in an
area where multi-homing was not possible, then that organization and its
customers would not be doing things that are mission critical, i.e.
business stops if there is no
I'm trying to track down someone at AT&T that can answer questions about
their implementation of BGP communities - questions that are not answered
in their BGP policy document. Conversations with first and second line
support people have not been productive. Any help that someone in a
netwo
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Randal Kohutek wrote:
I agree, 6500s or 4500s for distribution are where it's at ... Unfortunately
they cost a lot. Which is why the suits are considering financing them by
charging for the features they provide.
One way I've seen providers address is this to have two dif
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Joe Maimon wrote:
What should I expect?
I am seeing ~350 from a vendor provided mpls cloud to a site in
Sukhrali Chowk, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
Where are you running your tests from? USA (east or west coast)? Europe?
Elsewhere in Asia?
jms
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Joe Maimon wrote:
What should I expect?
I am seeing ~350 from a vendor provided mpls cloud to a site in
Sukhrali Chowk, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
Disregard my previous post. I completely overlooked the subject that said
"NY to New Delhi" *smacks forehead*.
Rule 1: Don't
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Carl Alexander wrote:
I've searched the archives, and am somewhat surprised to find no
discussion of this: Does anyone have a recommendation for cisco
repair/refurbishing? (Background for any who care: We had a
power supply die on a 7206VXR; a junior admin went to swap i
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Neil J. McRae wrote:
I remember in the past an excellent system using Sesame Street
characters names.
I've done things like this, but I confine it to my workstations. My
network devices and production systems follow a pretty straightforward
naming system.
Workstation
91 matches
Mail list logo
