I don't know how many of you have a Ham license but see
below:
In talking with communication providers in the region they
just now got satellite phones and in process of assessing
and repairing communication lines for New Orleans. They're
still somewhat challenged with comms including at she
Just an FYI, FBI and Secret Service are actively working these
as they are identified.
We definitely don't need more victims. If you don't feel
you're getting the response needed contact US CERT:
https://forms.us-cert.gov/report/ or
http://www.us-cert.gov/contact.html
We'll make sure the
Martin/NANOG, from US CERT OP's perspective we would welcome this discussion
and want to participate if NANOG can add it to the agenda next go around.
Unfortunately I wasn't able to personally participate in this NANOG event
but my team was there and we value the feedback that was provided.
There
Whelp, can't recall who said it at one of the NANOG presentations
last week but to recap, get involved to help point people in the
right direction in USG or at least provide enough "ops perspective"
to folks so they get a clue or more clue on some of the challenges of
these proposals. (n
FYI all, the Microsoft Official patch is out for WMF and available via Windows Update.Cheers,Jerry
We're notifying them via JTF-GNO (DOD-CERT).
As it relates to .mil's you can get to their site here: http://www.jtfgno.mil/
On government or .gov's you can reach us at www.us-cert.gov
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Geo. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 08:42 AM
We've looked at these from a DHS perspective and they are a great concept.
I know Sun has had the boxes here in DC on tour and worth checking out. I
believe FEMA was in process of looking into leveraging them for disaster
command centers along with the military.
I think the better approach is
built
out.
Just to add a disclaimer, these are my opinions and not an official
stance by the government.
Jerry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Oct 13, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Alan Clegg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jerry Dixon wrote:
We've looked at these from a DHS perspective and they are a gr
Jared> and all this time I thought you just wanted to attend those meetings to
see all of our bright faces and partake of the chocolate chip cookies :)
In all seriousness, it is very good to get involved in these meetings and stay
on top of what is going on. Plus it helps the gubment types out
Patrick/NANOG, see list of sites below to get information on IPV6
transitions. When you go to www.cio.gov you can type in ipv6 in the
search bar to get more information. When the USG migrates to IPv6
those agencies working with them will have to migrate or take one of
the approaches lis
All, this was inaccurate reporting and no organizational entity has been
specified to be the "master key" signer. There has been much discussion
about moving DNSsec forward by our S&T folks to increase the level of
security provided but we've been very much a facilitating role through S&T's
DHS focuses on facilitating how to make things more secure or reliable via
research, discussions with subject matter experts, and understanding of
various scenarios that could impact our economy, critical services, and
national security concerns. From that plans get developed, what type of
e
You can visit the US-CERT website at http://www.us-cert.gov/reading_room/ for
overview and recommendations on wireless.
Jerry
- Original Message -
From: Brandon Galbraith
To: MARLON BORBA
Cc: Deepak Jain ; nanog@merit.edu
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 7:21 PM
Subject: Re:
13 matches
Mail list logo
