Anyone know of any Fore/Marconi mailing lists and/or forums?
On 14-Dec-05, at 10:02 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
You also want to check all the registries which are superordinate
to zones your server is authoritative for, and check that any IP
addresses stored in those registries for your nameserver are
updated, otherwise you will experience either immedi
Good thing this router isn't in production yet, but unless I'm crazy,
Telus is having a bad day:
*>i0.0.0.0 64.201.161.218100 0 20161 852 i
Can anyone who's directly connected to AS852 verify before I call them
and.. uhm.. recommend my consulting services?
BTW: Ju
On Jan 27, 2005, at 3:01 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 02:51:35PM -0500, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
Good thing this router isn't in production yet, but unless I'm crazy,
Telus is having a bad day:
*>i0.0.0.0 64.201.161.218100 0 20161
852 i
Figure out how to do reverse route reflecting.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Ralph Doncaster
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:46 PM
> To: Robert A. Hayden
> Cc: Peter van Dijk; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: routing architectur
Uhh, come to think of it, the term reverse route reflecting probably
won't get you much help -- client to client route reflecting is probably
an easier term to understand.. My bad.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Ralph Doncaster
Are you just asking a question to get a better understanding of how
things work, Ralph or have you already put this into production and are
wondering why it doesn't work a certain way?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Ralph Doncast
ECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Ralph Doncaster
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 12:56 AM
> To: Jason Lixfeld
> Cc: 'Alex Rubenstein'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: iBGP next hop and multi-access media
>
>
>
> It's a theoretical question. So far I've
And to that end, I wonder how many of the bad queries are coming from MS
DNS servers.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Stephen J. Wilcox
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 7:05 PM
> To: Paul Vixie
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R
probably aren't smart enough to change what their DNS server 'appears'
to be either.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Dan Hollis
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 7:11 PM
> To: Jason Lixfeld
> Cc: &#x
> > I am sure thats part of it. Also, it might be a CPU issue as well.
> >
> Unicast RPF is affordable CPU-wise even in the most mediocre
> boxes people tend to have.
In more cases than not, especially now adays with lots of networks
peering all over gods creation, RPF can have some pretty de
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> > In more cases than not, especially now adays with lots of networks
> > peering all over gods creation, RPF can have some pretty detrimental
> > effects if your routing is somewhat asymmetrical.
>
> actually RPF is ext
> Those are reasons against.
>
> We in the technical community need to develop or modify our tools to
> make those tasks easier.
My point, exactly.
> Hire a lazy but smart admin! :)
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:45:22PM -0400, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> >
&
Irrd-discuss didn't have anything at all to say about this, so I thought
I'd bring it here for a different, practical perspective.
I'm wondering what the general concensus is with regards to IRR
implementation practices. I've done a little digging and have tried to
find practical exampl
Interesting -- I was actually having a conversation about this very same
thing with a friend of mine a few days ago. The problem we had, was
that he had next-hop-self on all of his ibgp mesh routers. Does that
not make it difficult to put an ip next-hop in? Also, would that ip
next-hop be propa
I like Segal's DoS idea, except instead of the packet generators, let's
be nice and just DDoS port 25 on the sunzofbiatches mail servers/load
balancers...
fight fire with fire... :)
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 20:39, Scott Silzer wrote:
> That is exactly what was done to to Futureway a third party s
Sorry for top posting, but I'm late for work...
--
Agreed. I believe that society dictates that the accumulation of
personal wealth is one of the most important factors to most people who
have the means to generate it in abundance. Any avenue to make a buck
will supersede any legislation or "P
IT WAS A JOKE
>
>
>
> Mark
>
> --
> Mark Segal
> Director, Data Services
> Futureway Communications Inc.
> Tel: (905)326-1570
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Lixfeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: December 11, 2002 8:51 AM
Seems to be OK as long as you are connected... Whoops.. there it goes,
nevermind :P
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 11:49, Mark Segal wrote:
> Service status is available at
> http://messenger.microsoft.com/support/status.asp
>
> But according to the page all is fine.. Which is NOT the case here either.
Looking for some links to case studies or other documentation which
describe implementing VoIP between sites which do not have point to
point links. From what I understand, you can't enforce end-to-end QoS
on a public network, nor over tunnels. I'm wondering if my basic
understanding of this
Laboratories, Inc.
http://www.bblabs.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Jason Lixfeld
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: VoIP QOS best practices
Looking for some links to case studies or other
Broadband Laboratories, Inc.
http://www.bblabs.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Jason Lixfeld
Sent: Monday, February 10, 2003 9:58 AM
To: Christopher J. Wolff
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: VoIP QOS best practices
Providing your sites ar
On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 12:47 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
Looking for some links to case studies or other documentation which
describe implementing VoIP between sites which do not have point to
point links. From what I understand, you can't enforce end-to-end
QoS
on a public network, n
On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 12:59 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
Any relationship between the two is just FUD from people
who've never used VoIP.
Indeed, people like me :)
No, no, I didn't mean you, you were just asking the question. I meant
the
folks who don't want end-users doing their ow
I forgot to cc nanog, but you can pick up USB to Serial adapters. I
just picked up a high speed usb to serial adapter for about $80CDN:
http://www.keyspan.com/products/usb/USA19W/
hth.
On Friday, March 21, 2003, at 04:31 PM, Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Friday, March 21, 2003 16:46:51 -0500 D
So that was the one...
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 1:09 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 01:02:42AM -0400, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
On Wednesday, July 16, 2003, at 11:34 PM, joshua sahala wrote:
anyone have the 'scheduled maintenance" mp3 lying around? i have a
fe
We're a small company but none the less are inundated with firewall
logs reporting numerous attempts to find holes in our network; c'est la
vie. Seeing as how we are small, we don't have the resources to go
through and send emails off to the abuse departments of each network
sourcing the probe
On Jan 29, 2004, at 9:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Microsoft software is inherently less safe than Linux/*BSD software.
This is because Microsoft has favored usability over security.
This is because the market has responded better to that tradeoff.
This is because your mom doesn't want to
On Jan 29, 2004, at 11:10 AM, Vivien M. wrote:
Then yer mom should get a Mac.
And if she's like my mom, she'll be in the aisle in the computer store
(well, the big box electronics store, more realistically) and be like
"Why
should I pay $2000 for this one when I can get 'a computer' for $500?"
On Jan 29, 2004, at 12:04 PM, Martin Hepworth wrote:
Actually, since I got my first Mac last year, I've been barking up
and down about how amazing it is. I told everyone I sold every PC I
ever owned because I could do it all on my powerbook. They are all
jealous. I had XP for my email,
On Jan 29, 2004, at 12:31 PM, Michel Py wrote:
If the Powershot was designed as a Mac-only camera, it's Canon's
stupidity. I never used one, but when I plug my Sony cybershot to any
PC
it comes up right away without any software.
I should withdraw this comment. After I sent the message, I real
e making another Apple or VW purchase.
Too bad.
The moral of the story is that theres always a downside, and you
should take any evangelist's schpiel with a giant salt lick.
As we have done here..
Now, then, I'm done. Back to on-topic stuff.
matto
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004, Jason Lixfeld
On Feb 7, 2004, at 3:34 PM, Scott Call wrote:
My question is who is stupid enough to actually respond to an email
written in 'leet speak like this.
I dunno what in the blue hell it's called but it sure as hell isn't
l337 speak. It's a cross between boken engrish and kindergarten
spelling.
On Mar 5, 2004, at 2:52 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
so anyone who is willing to be a whore for a list spammer should
just sign up right now.
I don't see anything specifically in NANOG's AUP or in the Charter
implying that this sort of thing is prohibited. Am I not looking hard
enough?
... and the
messages to db-admin have so far gone unanswered.
On Apr 14, 2004, at 2:47 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Jason Lixfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
messages to db-admin have so far gone unanswered.
I spoke with the "db-admin"; he advises as follows:
1) you sent a single message to create a maintainer object, about 24
hours b
So the overwhelming question for me is why? Is it simply the fact
that the native *nix underpinnings are where most users (within the
aforementioned demographic) spend most of their time anyway?
That's what did it for me - repeated attempts to get FreeBSD to run
stable on the Inspiron I
37 matches
Mail list logo
