Randy Bush wrote:
repeat:
it expitites things if you give folk an address they can ping to
test.
randy
58.6.7.1 is setup and should be pingable for testing purposes.
Jason
> Does anyone know of one?
No.
> Hell, has anyone even considered starting one?
No, and I doubt anybody seriously has. As a former employee, I can vouch
that the transponder costs were prohibitive to any start-up. It's
possible that a large established provider might be able to absorb the
lea
> Hadn't it gotten to the point shortly before Cidera folded that the
> satellite bandwidth was so insufficient for a "full feed" that it was of
> questionable value?...or was it still fine if you wanted a usenet feed
> with no binaries?
Probably. Yes.
IIRC, a full feed of usenet (3 years ago)
This is similar, and available for all regions/ASNs.
http://cs.unm.edu/~karlinjf/IAR/index.php
-- Jason
Paul Stewart wrote:
Very nice.. is there an ARIN equal that anyone knows of OR can you use
the RIPE one for ARIN registered space?
Just curious.. thanks..
Paul
-Original Message
refuse to pay term liability on.
I would avoid them if at all possible.
Jason
--
Jason Slagle - CCNP - CCDP
/"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign . Admin - spork/wombat.dal.net
X - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . Team Lead - Codin
I agree.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Mansey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 12:17 PM
> To: Cheung, Rick
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: PacBell Security/Abuse contact
>
>
>
> UUnet, excellent responsive abuse team IMHO.
>
> jm
>
> On Monday, Mar
The new 15540 is a much better box, not much more $ either. There are some
other people making extremely killer products, ONI being one that is very
popular. I wouldn't invest in a 15454 anymore with all the new products out
there, we still use them, but anything new will be a better box.
> --
On that note, Etrade layed off their entire net sec team a few months back.
I don't trade there no more. ;)
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Donelan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 7:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: How to get better security people
>
share a bit of
information. The tone of your reply is a bit off.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Popovitch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:06 AM
> To: LeBlanc, Jason; 'Sean Donelan'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: How to get better
Being a coworker of Dre's, I can attest that his crack pipe is one of the
finest. =P We love dre. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Gironda, Andre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 9:35 PM
To: 'Richard A Steenbergen '; Gironda, Andre
Cc: ''Daniel Golding' '; ''Alex Ruben
With enough badgering most providers will accept a /24 announcement of PA
space.
Exodus is the an exception, using their IP space is nightmarish.
-Original Message-
From: Borchers, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:35 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:
Just announced on their site:
http://www1.worldcom.com/us/tools/noc/status.xml
--
Jason Beltrame
INetU, Inc.(tm)- http://www.INetU.net
Electronic commerce - Web development - Web hosting
Cisco very recently published "IS-IS Network Design Solutions", ISBN
1-57870-220-8. I don't know of any other good references. It's obviously
Cisco-centric but does try to cover questions like "why do I want IS-IS
instead of [mumble] as my IGP".
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Penderg
uRPF and Radware DoShield, one DoShield per link btw edge router and core
router. Use IDS (yes there is a way to capture all your traffic and
anaylyze it, regardless of bandwidth, no it isn't one box) to identify a
signature, build a filter, config filter on DoShield, up to ~200Mb/s per
DoShield
I'll post.
-Original Message-
From: Richard A Steenbergen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:23 AM
To: LeBlanc, Jason
Cc: 'Pete Kruckenberg'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks?
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:54:05AM
Try a compiled ACL on a 3 port gigE for some fun.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher L. Morrow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:48 AM
To: Vincent Gillet
Cc: Christopher L. Morrow; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Pete Kruckenberg;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Effective way
about that is
valid would be in CEF. If I'm misunderstanding, please do send more info.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Turpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:05 AM
To: LeBlanc, Jason
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks?
O
out to be
worthwhile.
-Original Message-
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:58 AM
To: LeBlanc, Jason
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks?
If you just filter out anything that's not in the routing tabl
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 10:19 AM
To: Hank Nussbacher
Cc: LeBlanc, Jason; 'Pete Kruckenberg'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks?
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:07:31PM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> At 12:23 PM 02-05-02 -0
-0700, LeBlanc, Jason wrote something
like this:
> Thats how it we understood it to work (CEF lookup). It checks for a route
> in the table, obviously any real route would be in the CEF table. I may
be
> wrong, but it doesn't actually send a packet to verify, the logical way to
> chec
I can't find info on network solutions website for changing info for my
NIC handle? What is the deal?
I figured I would send an empty messages to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and get some info, but the email it send
back is full of dead links.
For the life of me, I can't find and info on where all the temp
Maybe I should have explained. All the domains I care about are at other
registrars.
My old NIC handle points to an email address that is dead. It is still
attached to a few domains I would like to takeover when they expire.
jas
Check out this book:
"High-Availability Network Fundamentals"
Cisco Press
ISBN 1-58713-017-3
Despite its Cisco Press origin, the book is 99% vendor-neutral and applies
to any equipment. It helps you calculate MTBF-based availability of entire
network paths, factoring in various types of red
>
>
> Which, by the way, rocks the hizzy.
>
> If anyone needs some qmail-scanner and/or spam-assassin help in qmail,
> let me know. I just spent the last couple days pfutzing with it
> extensively.
>
I just bumped my hit count to 6. I found a small number of lists I am on
were making it into my
> Is it me or is it very quiet in here today?
>
> Jane
All the frequent posters have been banned for 6 months. ;)
> So my question for the group is, do chat programs (IM, IRC, yahoo) serve
> a substantial network support purpose or are they more of a distraction,
> allowing staff to communicate with friends, relatives, drifters,
> interlopers on company time?
>
I disagree. I have spent many hours in a nois
There is a lot of news lately about terrorist groups doing recon on
potential targets. The stories got me thinking.
What are the real threats to the global Internet?
I am looking for anything that might be a potential attack point. I don't
want to start a flame war, but any interesting or eve
> I think the media talk about "taking down the Internet" are kind of
> bogus.
>
> Nobody has ever died because they couldn't check their email.
>
> If the net went down for an hour, a day, or even a week I think that my
> mom and the rest of the non "glued-to-their-terminal" world would
> someho
>
> There is also a "cart and horse" issue here: Where is the pervasive
> content?
>
> Most content providers don't want multicast because it breaks their
> billing model. They can't tell how many viewers they have at a given
> moment, what the average viewing time is, or any of the other thing
There is an Apache worm out there, and it uses port 2001/udp to operate. You
may wanna scan your own boxes for this open port.
The payload it tries to dump is located below:
---
begin 655 .a
M?T5,1@$!`0D```(``P`!K)`$"#0```"PLP```#0`(``&
M`"@`&0`6``8T-(`$"#2`!`C`P
MAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jason Legate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Just an FYI - Apache Worm on the loose
>
>
> Is this a new apache worm, or the one that was circulating a week or so
> ago that was described as weak and ineffective
Grow up troy.
On Tue, Jul 09, 2002 at 08:06:33PM -0400, Rizzo Frank wrote:
> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 20:06:33 -0400
> From: Rizzo Frank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Just an FYI - Apache Worm on the loose
>
>
> Jason Legate wrote:
>
> I'm seeing 2-5% packet loss going through a Cisco 2621 with <10mbps of
> traffic running at ~50% CPU. (packet loss based on ping results)
>
Isn't ping the first thing to be dropped in favor of other traffic? I
remember a similar issue and Cisco saying that was the behavior. Don't
quote me
veryone is going to agree that company X needs to be
blocked.
Overall it's a great idea, but I don't think it's practical ... I've
stuck to using blocklists and intelligent filtering. I've spent a
great deal of time over the past few years developing our system and I
thi
lag that's worth passing on.
I am skeptical, but I suppose this could be harmless.
FWIW, I've seen AS4788 on old CIDR reports under "Possible Bogus
Routes":
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/routing-wg/2003/msg00146.htm
l
-Jason
--
Jason Sloderbeck
Posi
there and it's naive to
pretend that fairness to non-English folks or globalization justifies a
hole this large. Certainly, the vulnerability is just as much a problem
for the targeted benefactors of this change.
-Jason
--
Jason Sloderbeck
Positive Networks
jason @ positivenetworks
at the chance to "help" you in order to try and convince
you to move away from the CLEC.
-Fer
Jason "Feren" Olsen DeVry, Inc.
Senior Network Engineer One Tower Lane
Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181-4624
Ph: 630.645.1607 Fx: 630.382.2929
his month's international NANOG travel safety
thread. Next month, we'll be talking about the best way to hail a taxi
in various countries (during a network emergency, of course).
-Jason
--
Jason Sloderbeck
Positive Networks
jason @ positivenetworks . Net
ot;guess" that the
two might be related and certainly wasn't pointing fingers as if that
was the definitive reason.
It sometimes happens that seemingly disparate events are actually
linked, so it was not an entirely illogical guess.
-JFO
Jason "Feren" Olsen DeVry, Inc.
Se
something for the
short term.
-Jason
--
Jason Sloderbeck
Positive Networks
jason @ positivenetworks . net
zdnet.co.uk/internet/security/0,39020375,39211011,00.htm
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
now a good lawyer? :)
> --
>Leo Bicknell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - CCIE 3440
> PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
> Read TMBG List - [EMAIL PROTECTED], www.tmbg.org
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ole in SSL/PKI. We should be
working to avoid security risks, not approving them in RFCs.
- "Only the TLDs are protected."
That's already the case with the way cert's are issued (e.g. you
can go register "ebay.stealyourcreditcard.cx" and get a cert) ... old
e well known software manufacturers
would look to engage in \ use. Maybe by way of public forums such as
this is that accomplished. In labels we trust.
http://www.radium.ncsc.mil/tpep/index.html
http://www.radium.ncsc.mil/tpep/tpep.html
http://www.radium.ncsc.mil/tpep/process/faq-sect6.html#Q8
-Jason
Anyone know of any Fore/Marconi mailing lists and/or forums?
on Sat Sep 10 03:39:59 2005 Christopher L. Morrow writes
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>
> [Perhaps this thread should migrate to Multi6?]
>
perhaps... then jason can argue this instead of me :)
The most basic question is if there will be a problem if we
e.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-50/presentations/ripe50-plenary-
tue-nfsen-nfdump.pdf
-Jason
.167.4)
;; WHEN: Thu Sep 29 10:39:33 2005
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 81
> --
> Matthew S. Crocker
> Vice President
> Crocker Communications, Inc.
> Internet Division
> PO BOX 710
> Greenfield, MA 01302-0710
> http://www.crocker.com
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, though I find those
highly suspect. Choose your villan, I guess.
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/states/california/
northern_california/12933014.htm
http://www.nbc4.tv/news/5115425/detail.html
http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=local&id=3546999
Jason "Feren&
so served by the network live through it?
Jason "Feren" Olsen Senior Network Engineer DeVry, Inc
Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ph: 630-645-1607One Tower Lane
INOC-DBA: 19258*526 Fx: 630-389-2929Oakbrook Terrace,
IL 60181
On 14-Dec-05, at 10:02 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
You also want to check all the registries which are superordinate
to zones your server is authoritative for, and check that any IP
addresses stored in those registries for your nameserver are
updated, otherwise you will experience either immedi
T1's.
If you don't already, it might help to start analyzing your traffic
characteristics.
-Jason
[1]
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls-
ipf.html
Has anyone else noticed an increase in layer 3 downtime in newedges
network since the "big meltdown"? I'm now losing connectivity several
times a day, and only layer 3. Attempts to go through the normal support
channels have resulted in runarounds and layer one/two tests.
have a vendor supported product, but having
clamav in the mix helps tremendously...
And there's a windows version as well (albeit, by another developer)
... http://www.clamwin.net
> Nils
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anyone have any ideas how to get in contact with namecheap? Short
of driving up there noone is really helpful with our issue. We need to
get a serial number incremented on a DNS change, and they cant seem to
understand our update.
Thanks
Jason
Good thing this router isn't in production yet, but unless I'm crazy,
Telus is having a bad day:
*>i0.0.0.0 64.201.161.218100 0 20161 852 i
Can anyone who's directly connected to AS852 verify before I call them
and.. uhm.. recommend my consulting services?
BTW: Ju
On Jan 27, 2005, at 3:01 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 02:51:35PM -0500, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
Good thing this router isn't in production yet, but unless I'm crazy,
Telus is having a bad day:
*>i0.0.0.0 64.201.161.218100 0 20161
852 i
t everybody blocks port 25 so current-day
> worms are more than efficient still.
So I guess users will have to stop clicking that "Save Password"
button... That is, until the worm records the keystrokes when the
password is entered... *sigh*
> Gadi.
>
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 12:26:55 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 12:16:41 EST, Jason Frisvold said:
>
> > Agreed. And depending on your service, there are different ports
> > worth blocking. For residential users, I can't
ending junk.
Ouch .. Then spammers may start using a From: matching the SMTP auth
user, and effectively joe-jobbing the user.. Ick..
> Adi
>
>
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pam to a slow
trickle.. It's working here, thus far... And I don't have
authentication fully implemented yet. :)
> --
> Daniel Golding
> Network and Telecommunications Strategies
> Burton Group
>
>
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ock port 587, and I can't see how spammers will use port 587 for
spamming, unless they have a username/password for relaying..
> Andrew
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
function.
The benifiet was seen pretty quick here, That in combination with
some throttles permiting the standard customer only to send 400emails
in a hour has cleaned us up pretty significantly.
Jason
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 07:04:26PM -0600, Claydon, Tom stated
>
> We are consi
you're the
minority... I wouldn't mind having an alternate service, with no
change in pricing, that would allow users like you to have the freedom
they want. In fact, if I had any demand for it at all, I'd set
something up in a heartbeat.
> "Wehret den Anfaengen" is the german saying, I currently cannot find a
> good translation for.
>
> Nils
>
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
isoning attacks? Is it beneficial, or
even possible, to prevent TTL's from being an excessively high value?
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 minutes I guess life
> would be much harder than if you had to do it once every day?
I dunno.. how hard is it to poison a cache? :)
> --
> Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There was, at one time, a fairly serious memory leak in Cisco CNR...
I believe I saw a post indicating that CNR was possibly in use?
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A, Verizon-GTE, Sprint/United, Warwick Valley
Telephone, SBC-SNET, Citizens-Frontier, RCI-Frontier.
Ha!
I think Putnam County, OH holds the record of most telco's in a county.
Take a look at this map:
http://www.puc.state.oh.us/
x27;t know about dnsbl's. To state that
you make a concerted effort to use them nowadays may be false.
Spamassassin comes out of the box poking SORBS and adding score if it's in
there. I turned it off because of questionable listings, but how many
users of SA know h
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Dan Hollis
> To: Owen DeLong
> Subject: Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden
>
> You must not have used it much in those 20 years. I can
> definitely say worms, trojans, spam, phishing, dd
port and making a VoIP call?
Where should I be routed when I'm making a VoIP call while wardriving?
> - --
> =
> bep
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ut any sort of legal
request? I don't have a problem releasing information asked for in a
subpeona, but to turn over an entire customer list without any
specific criminal charges having been files is a little much.
Please tell me I'm misreading this...
> - ferg
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
charges had been filed... I'm not a lawyer and I don't even pretend
to understand fully how the whole system works, so I'm probably
wrong.. :)
> Chris Ranch
> Affinity Internet, Inc.
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
fun when you get one
that requests the IP address of the user and all they give you is a
screen name. *sigh*
> Chris
> Affinity Internet, Inc.
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
does their BGP thing, etc. It can be hard to do proper
troubleshooting when one team can only go so far before you're forced to
hand off and start the process anew.
Your best bet is to start with the obvious (get the BGP config and ACLs
they're applying for you) and work your way from t
. Go about halfway down the
page and they list the various communities and purposes. They also
support remote-triggered blackholing.
-jfo
Jason "Feren" Olsen DeVry, Inc.
Senior Network Engineer One Tower Lane
Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181-
de it's easy to guess why they are attempting to
force the consumer to buy/maintain batteries for the boxes: as always,
follow the money...
-jfo
Jason "Feren" Olsen DeVry, Inc.
Senior Network Engineer One Tower Lane
Em: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181-4624
Ph: 630.645.1607 Fx: 630.382.2929
onal routing.. But I don't see a lot
of MPLS implementations either...
> Pete
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Where's my flying car?
> randy
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
r the same routers as that bad-old Internet thing with
> the haxors and such!"
Heh...
> :)
>
--
Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the government
finally getting rolling and actually announcing the plan I may finally
have a whip big enough to get my management to start thinking about the
future (if only because we have to communicate with government
institutions as part of our daily business operations).
Jason "F
Figure out how to do reverse route reflecting.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Ralph Doncaster
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:46 PM
> To: Robert A. Hayden
> Cc: Peter van Dijk; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: routing architectur
Uhh, come to think of it, the term reverse route reflecting probably
won't get you much help -- client to client route reflecting is probably
an easier term to understand.. My bad.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Ralph Doncaster
user.
Wouldn't a malicious uid 0 user just change the regular root password?
How does this add any additional layer of accountability. A uid 0 user
can erase the logfiles, unless they are immutable and you are in se
Are you just asking a question to get a better understanding of how
things work, Ralph or have you already put this into production and are
wondering why it doesn't work a certain way?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Ralph Doncast
ECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Ralph Doncaster
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 12:56 AM
> To: Jason Lixfeld
> Cc: 'Alex Rubenstein'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: iBGP next hop and multi-access media
>
>
>
> It's a theoretical question. So far I've
And to that end, I wonder how many of the bad queries are coming from MS
DNS servers.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Stephen J. Wilcox
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 7:05 PM
> To: Paul Vixie
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R
probably aren't smart enough to change what their DNS server 'appears'
to be either.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Dan Hollis
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 7:11 PM
> To: Jason Lixfeld
> Cc: &#x
> > I am sure thats part of it. Also, it might be a CPU issue as well.
> >
> Unicast RPF is affordable CPU-wise even in the most mediocre
> boxes people tend to have.
In more cases than not, especially now adays with lots of networks
peering all over gods creation, RPF can have some pretty de
> On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> > In more cases than not, especially now adays with lots of networks
> > peering all over gods creation, RPF can have some pretty detrimental
> > effects if your routing is somewhat asymmetrical.
>
> actually RPF is ext
> Those are reasons against.
>
> We in the technical community need to develop or modify our tools to
> make those tasks easier.
My point, exactly.
> Hire a lazy but smart admin! :)
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 02:45:22PM -0400, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
> >
&
Irrd-discuss didn't have anything at all to say about this, so I thought
I'd bring it here for a different, practical perspective.
I'm wondering what the general concensus is with regards to IRR
implementation practices. I've done a little digging and have tried to
find practical exampl
Interesting -- I was actually having a conversation about this very same
thing with a friend of mine a few days ago. The problem we had, was
that he had next-hop-self on all of his ibgp mesh routers. Does that
not make it difficult to put an ip next-hop in? Also, would that ip
next-hop be propa
Does anyone know where I can get a list of compuserve's proxy ip's?
Thanks,
Jason
--
Jason Beltrame
INetU, Inc.(tm)- http://www.INetU.net
Electronic commerce - Web develop
Yes, but they didn't know. Their website also didn't list them.
--
Jason Beltrame
INetU, Inc.(tm)- http://www.INetU.net
Electronic commerce - Web development - Web hosting
[EMAIL PROTECTE
G phones do concurrent data AND voice don't they? You could
describe the flames you're seeing!
Jason
--
Jason Slagle - CCNP - CCDP
/"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign .
X - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail .
/ \ - NO Word docs in e-mail .
I like Segal's DoS idea, except instead of the packet generators, let's
be nice and just DDoS port 25 on the sunzofbiatches mail servers/load
balancers...
fight fire with fire... :)
On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 20:39, Scott Silzer wrote:
> That is exactly what was done to to Futureway a third party s
Sorry for top posting, but I'm late for work...
--
Agreed. I believe that society dictates that the accumulation of
personal wealth is one of the most important factors to most people who
have the means to generate it in abundance. Any avenue to make a buck
will supersede any legislation or "P
IT WAS A JOKE
>
>
>
> Mark
>
> --
> Mark Segal
> Director, Data Services
> Futureway Communications Inc.
> Tel: (905)326-1570
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jason Lixfeld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: December 11, 2002 8:51 AM
Seems to be OK as long as you are connected... Whoops.. there it goes,
nevermind :P
On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 11:49, Mark Segal wrote:
> Service status is available at
> http://messenger.microsoft.com/support/status.asp
>
> But according to the page all is fine.. Which is NOT the case here either.
1 - 100 of 294 matches
Mail list logo
