Re: ams-ix - worth using?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 matthew zeier wrote: > Does it simply provide an easy way to privately connect to transit and > peers? Or can I also go crazy and peer with anyone who wants to peer > (like in the olden day!) ? EU peering is very different from US peering (as many

Re: shameful-cabling gallery of infamy - does anybody know where

Alexander Harrowell wrote: > "Our Internet service is in the toilet again!" > > "Yes, that's where we installed it.." http://www.computing.co.uk/vnunet/news/2196948/university-taps-sewers-internet -- COO Entanet International T: 0870 770 9580 W: http://www.enta.net/ L: http://tinyurl.com/3bxq

Re: Why do some ISP's have bandwidth quotas?

Hex Star wrote: > Why is it that the US has ISP's with either no quotas or obscenely high > ones while countries like Australia have ISP's with ~12gb quotas? Is > there some kind of added cost running a non US ISP? In the UK there is a very good reason - BT, see this write up: http://www.kitz.co

Re: Can P2P applications learn to play fair on networks?

Joe Provo wrote: >A provider-hosted solution which > managed to transparently handle this across multiple clients and > trackers would likely be popular with the end users. but not with the rights holders... J -- COO Entanet International T: 0870 770 9580 W: http://www.enta.net/ L: http://ti

BGP Communities

Hi, Following up on the thread about BGP communities, I was wondering if there is a guide on how to actually implement communities within a network... There are a couple of presentations about why communities are good and about the general design of communities but my googlefu has so far not fou

Re: BGP Communities

Robert Baxter wrote: > This may be of use to you. > http://www.secsup.org/Tracking/ > Thanks, should have been more specific, its more a case of being able to give traffic engineering like the ones listed on http://www.onesc.net/communities/ J -- COO Entanet International T: 0870 770 9580 W: h

Re: Calling TeliaSonera - time to implement prefix filtering

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're currently receiving the following prefix from TeliaSonera on one of our IP transit links in Oslo: aut-num:AS29049 as-name:Delta-Telecom-AS descr: Delta Telecom LTD. descr: International Communication Operator descr: Aze

Re: OT: How to stop UltraDNS sales people calling

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jon Lyons wrote: > Get the guys direct number and start calling him all day. Direct > marketers/debt collectors really hate it when you call them at work and > bug them.. :) > Or give them a premium rate number that they can call that goes to perman

Re: OT: How to stop UltraDNS sales people calling

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Levine wrote: >> He told me he would still calling until he got through to the right >> person. I am the right person. > > Next time, try asking for the name and phone number of his boss, so > you can call and report what an excellent job he's

Re: today's Wash Post Business section

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Edward Lewis wrote: > Yeah, granted anyone looking for myspace might meet that demographic, > but how many neophytes would use Google for a "IP Who Is" "search"? > That's the listing I thought odd. Having looked at the article isn't this a case of s

Quick BGP peering question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, Very simply : Would you accept traffic from a customer who insists on sending 0 prefixes across a BGP session? J - -- COO Entanet International T: 0870 770 9580 http://www.enta.net/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) C

Re: Quick BGP peering question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil J. McRae wrote: > are you advertising them routes? > If so then why wouldn't you expect traffic? >> -Original Message- > Very simply : Would you accept traffic from a customer who insists on > sending 0 > prefixes across a BGP session?

Re: Birmingham UK colocation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Gristina wrote: > I have two racks in London UK. The colocation is > currently in London. The contract is up soon and most > of the feet on the ground in the UK of the company is > in the greater Birmingham area. So I'm interested in > coloca

Re: botnets: web servers, end-systems and Vint Cerf

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > You misunderstand. The problem of securing machines *IS* solved. It is > possible. It is regularly done with servers connected to the Internet. > There is no *COMPUTING* problem or technical problem. True *BUT* (and this

Re: RPSL question

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Voellmy wrote: > I'm trying to learn about BGP and just ran across RPSL. I've seen > www.radb.net and know that lots of people are > registering their policies here. Are organizations also using these RPSL > policies to c

Re: 96.2.0.0/16 Bogons

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Eric Ortega wrote: > I am a network engineer for Midcontinent Communications We are an ISP in > the American Midwest. Recently, we were allocated a new network > assignment: 96.2.0.0/16. We've been having major issues with sites still > blocking this

Re: IP Block 99/8

Shai Balasingham wrote: > > We recently started to assign these blocks. So all the ranges are not > assigned yet. Following are some... > > 99.245.135.129 > 99.246.224.1 > 99.244.192.1 All reachable from here (as8468) J -- COO Entanet International T: 0870 770 9580 W: http://www.enta.net/ L

Re: How many others are nullrouting BT?

Jo Rhett wrote: > > We've long been aware that BT *never* deals with spammers or DoS attacks > that originate from their network, but a new issue has come to light. > BT has a number of users who are apparently testing out stolen credit > card numbers from their network against stores of all fla

Network Level Content Blocking (UK)

Hi all, Sorry for the cross posting to a number of lists but this is an important topic for many of you (especially if you get multiple copies). As many people are aware there is an 'expectation' that 'consumer' broadband providers introduce network level content blocking for specified content o

Re: Network Level Content Blocking (UK)

Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > [trimmed other lists, not sure if they'd appreciate nanog volumes] > > On 7-jun-2007, at 11:06, James Blessing wrote: > >> As many people are aware there is an 'expectation' that 'consumer' >> broadband provi

Re: Network Level Content Blocking (UK)

Joe Abley wrote: > Anyway, how does BT's cleanfeed work? How are British 3G operators doing > equivalent blocking? I'd be interested in learning about the > implementation. There is an excellent paper on the failures of clean feed here: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/cleanfeed.pdf J -- COO En