Bill Stewart wrote:
> When Verisign hijacked the wildcard DNS space for .com/.net, they
> encoded the Evil Bit in the response by putting Sitefinder's IP
> address as the IP address. In theory you could interpret that as
> damage and route around it, or at least build ACLs to block any
> traffic
Personally, I have trouble accepting some of the claims the
geotargeting companies have made, such as Quova's 99.9% to the country
level, and 95% to the US state level. ( More info at
http://www.quova.com/page.php?id=132 ) Perhaps I'm just part of the
outlying data; using the "three top search en
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:17:36PM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:13:17 +0000, Greg Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Personally, I have trouble accepting some of the claims the
> > geotargeting companies have made, such as Quova's 99.9
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 01:10:53AM +0200, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> The problem is that fairness was probably never a design goal of TCP,
> even with Van Jacobson's congestion avoidance patch.
>
> Bob Briscoe is a member of the IETF Transport Working Group (TSVWG).
> This subject got some publici
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 11:48:31PM -0400, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 08:04:12PM -0400, Barry Shein wrote:
> A number of things that are true, including:
>
> > I say the core problem in spam are the botnets capable of delivering
> > on the order of 100 billion msgs/day.
>
> Bu
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 03:39:05PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 16 Apr 2008, at 13:33 , Simon Waters wrote:
>
> > Ask anyone in the business "if I want a free email account who do I
> > use.." and you'll get the almost universal answer Gmail.
>
> I think amongst those not in the business the
