archive.routeviews.org might have what you're looking for.
Dave
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 11:26:39AM -0700, Roy wrote:
>>
>> Does anyone dump their copy of the routing table to a flat file
>> regularly and make this available? I need do some queries. The web
>> based versions don't accept modi
Stephen,
>> I think this is the key point. Its common sense that peering
>> with the downstreams will improve user quality of service by
>> both reducing latency and taking unnecessary points of failure
>> out of the network.
Is it really common sense? If so, is the common sense correct?
In f
Here's my $0.02 on the whole multicast thing. We've been at this
for a number of years now, and robust, ubiquitous multicast
on the internet is really nowhere in sight. Kind of sounds like
QoS, and maybe there's a lesson there (20 years of research and
IETF activity, yielding, well, what?).
Giv
>> Even worse, multicast is truly only suitable for live applications; on-demand
>> content can't be realistically mcasted, and users will not settle for "the movie
>> starts every 15 minutes" when they've been used to live VOD with unicast. The
>> only saving grace may be things like TiVo, wher
>> the IETF's efforts have been extremely fruitful.
That is good to hear.
Dave
Pete,
>> I'm doing some analysis of who I might be able to reach via
>> multicast through Sprint.
>>
>> Sadly, route-views multicast peering with Sprint is not
>> working at the moment.
My mistake. I'll fix it.
Dave
It's there now.
route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip mbgp sum | inc 1239
144.228.241.81 4 1239 4900318729 114266 170 00:02:34 3975
Dave
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 12:01:12PM -0700, David Meyer wrote:
>>
>> Pete,
>>
>> >> I'm doing some a
Andre,
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 06:04:22PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>
> Joe Abley wrote:
> >
> >On 2005-07-07, at 10:23, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >
> >>It was about a spot in the global routing table. No matter if one gets
> >>PA or PI they get a routing table entry in the DFZ. The
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:58:56AM -0700, Alexei Roudnev wrote:
>
> What's the problem with independent address space for every entity (company,
> family, enterprise) which wants it? Big routing tables? Is RT of 1,000,000
> routes BIG? I do not think so. Memory is cheap, modern routing schemas lik
Seems like it might be a good time to update everyone on
the IAB IPv6 Multi-homing BOF we're holding Monday
afternoon at NANOG. My very draft introduction slides are
on http://www.1-4-5.net/~dmm/talks/NANOG35/multihoming.
Dave
pgpNenCFArWcU.pgp
Descriptio
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 01:45:40AM -0700, Tony Li wrote:
>
> >
> >Doesn't NAT, or more specifically the most commonly used, NAPT, create
> >hard state within the network, which then makes it violate the
> >end-to-end argument ? Also, because it has to understand transport and
> >application layer
John,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 02:08:50AM +1000, Geoff Huston wrote:
> > From: John Payne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: shim6 @ NANOG
> > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 09:11:45 -0400
>
>
> Public thanks to Dave, Geoff, Vijay, Ted and Jason for their
> involvement in bringing shim6 to the NA
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 07:39:09AM -0800, Fred Baker wrote:
>
> None that I have spoken with. What I hear continually is that people
> would like operational viewpoints on what they're doing and are
> concerned at the fact that operators don't involve themselves in IETF
> discussions.
> but please don't plan yet another "the wonderful things the
> ivtf is doing in area x."
Actually, that is not at all what I had intened or
planned, and if it came across that way then to some
extent we failed. In any event, I do appreciate this
feedback.
> t
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 10:16:11AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>
> I am unable to telnet or ping route-views.routeviews.org. No event listed
> at http://www.routeviews.org/update.html
>
> Is it just me?
Sorry folks, we've been having a memory fragmentation
problem. Should be
>> bummer that. data not being collected. one weeps to think of
>> all those announcements lost forever.
>>
>> is a data gap like a mineshaft gap?
Just to be clear:
The box that hung was route-views.routeviews.org. We
collect 'sh ip bgp' RIBs from this box on 2 hour
Long story short (excerpt from an email I sent to Tony
Bates and Larry Lang):
---
In our discussion yesterday on the Service Exchange
Architecture (SEA) list, I mentioned a kind of a
"Telecommunications Perfect Storm" (TPS) that we should
at least b
[...]
> How many of these are in place today? Well, clearly google
> is building out, so there is potential for (i). to occur
> any day now. Likewise (ii) (linksys gear with 4 tunable
> radios, North-South WiMAX, east west 802.11bag, and
> you're there). Finally, (iii)
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 07:34:56PM -0800, David Meyer wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:29:29AM +, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, John Kristoff wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 19:15:49 -0500 (EST)
>
On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 03:52:20AM +, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>
> > Hello Dave;
> >
> > This won't open for me.
> >
> > Do you have a pdf of these slides ?
> >
> > On Dec 15,
Kevin,
>> I am seeking avenues to investigate a possible case of IP address spoofing.
>>
>> I've recently received complaints which suggest that in the recent
>> past (but not right now), somebody may have announced a more specific
>> prefix, effectively hijacking "unused" address space
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 02:54:30PM +, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 1 Jul 2005, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
> > >
> > > This keeps coming up in each discussion about v6, 'what security measures'
> > > is never really defined in any real sense. As near as I can tell it's
> > > level of '
Many people have asked me to put the references from my
complexity panel talk up somewhere. You can find some of
the relevant literature on
http://www.maoz.com/~dmm/complexity_and_the_internet
I will try to keep this up to date, and please let me
I very much agree with Steve. The workshop has been interesting
and relevant.
Dave
On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 03:58:10PM +0100, Steve Bellovin wrote:
>>
>> Let me point folk at the Internet Measurement Workshop:
>> http://www.icir.org/vern/imw-2002/ including especially the
>> link to the online p
Many people have asked to to update my complexity pages
with a bit of theoretical background to to support some
of the material there (in particular, percolation
theory). So, as promised, I've updated
http://www.maoz.com/~dmm/complexity_and_the_internet
Ratul,
>> understanding of routing (especially inter-domain) in the research
>> community is really primitive. this precludes us from having realistic
>> routing models. we recently started working on understanding prevalent
>> inter-domain routing policies. the ultimate goal is to improv
>>
>> I was hoping someone might be able to shed some light on the Utah cut.
>>
>> The news report said that the cut happened near Monroe Utah, which is several miles
>> off of I 70. Yet the cities that were reported effected included St. George, Cedar
>> City, and Salt Lake, which all are ad
I'm looking for some multicast information.
Thanks,
Dave
Greetings,
route-views (AS6447) is pleased to announce our presence
at NSPIXPII (202.249.2.166), courtesy of Akira Kato and
WIDE.
The route-views project operates BGP route collectors
that provide global routing data to both operator and
r
>> I'm still waiting for the discovery of its natural enemy, the Backhoeiosaur.
All kidding aside, my concern is that it's natural enemy
has just found it.
>> It's such a wonderful example of how exquisite nature is as a
>> designer and builder of complex systems," said Geri Ric
>> Does anyone know to go about getting Qwest or a CLEC to patch through a dry
>> pair between two buildings connected to the same CO?
>>
>> When I called to order one, no one knew what I was talking about.
Try ordering a LADS circuit (they come in 2 or 4 pair).
Dave
>> It's genrally called a lads circuit.
BTW, LADS == Local Area Data Service.
Dave
>>
>> joelja
>>
>> On Fri, 29 Aug 2003, Pendergrass, Greg wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Neither do we. Could you include some more details?
>> >
>> > -Greg
>> >
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Austad, Jay
All,
In response to requests from many folks asking for prefix
to AS mappings, routeviews is now providing 2 new services
mapping and address or prefix to its origin AS and to its
ASPath. These services are available via two zones:
(i).asn.ro
>> I would also suggest that we try to make contact with a second-harvest or
>> other organization that may be able to use the tomatoes afterwards.
Or just use your time and resources to do some good for
those who are less fortunate in the first place. Using
food of any ki
As part of the "Route-Views Update" presentation
delivered at the NANOG 29 in Chicago, we openly invited
participants at the PAIX (install pending) and NSPIXP
(WIDE) exchanges to peer with Route-Views (AS6447).
For those who may have forgotten or were not
Folks,
We have set up a few new mailing lists for the routeviews
project; see http://routeviews.org/~majordom/rv-lists.html
Thanks,
Dave
Folks,
We are now up and running at the PAIX (Palo Alto) and
would like to invite folks at the PAIX to peer with
with Route-Views. Please contact us at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you would like contribute your view.
Thanks,
The Route-Views Tea
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 04:05:56PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> I'm seeing the following in RouteViews (possibly since they started
>> getting data from paix):
>>
>> route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bgp 0.0.0.1
>> BGP routing table entry for 0.0.0.0/, version 19579757
>> Paths: (2 avail
Jared,
>> I keep hear of Frame-Relay and ATM signaling that is going
>> to happen in large providers MPLS cores. That's right, your "safe" TDM
>> based services, will be transported over someones IP backbone first.
>> This means if they don't protect their IP network, the TDM servic
Jared,
>> >Is your concern that carrying FR/ATM/TDM over a packet
>> >core (IP or MPLS or ..) will, via some mechanism, reduce
>> >the resilience of the those services, of the packet core,
>> >of both, or something else?
>>
>> I'm saying that if a network had a FR/AT
Petri,
>> I think it has been proven a few times that physical fate sharing is
>> only a minor contributor to the total connectivity availability while
>> system complexity mostly controlled by software written and operated by
>> imperfect humans contribute a major share to end-to-end
Hey Suki,
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
>> service without needing to run label switching in the
>> core(LDP/TDP/RSVP) but straight IP (aka iMPLS).
ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-dra
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 10:02:10AM -0800, Yakov Rekhter wrote:
>> Dave,
>>
>> > Hey Suki,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:14:20PM -0800, sonet twister wrote:
>> > >> Hello,
>> > >>
>> > >> i heard there is a way to run MPLS for layer3 VPN(2547)
>> > >> service without needing to run labe
Folks,
We are now up and running at the LINX (London Internet
Exchange) and would like to invite folks at the LINX to
peer with route-views. You can get to the open CLI via
'telnet route-views.linx.routeviews.org' (of course,
nothing much there yet)
>> The TTL mechanism is just a way to distinguish at low cost between
>> good for_us traffic and junk. So more of a classifer than a security
>> layer, though it can be argued both ways. And even though it
>> does have security in the title, it is _not_ a panacea for "securing"
>> bgp or any rout
Pete,
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:15:46AM -0400, Peter Rohrman wrote:
>>
>> Is route-views.oregon-ix.net down? I cant get to it.
Please use route-views.routeviews.org (we're trying to transition
of the exchange addresses as they are not routed everywhere).
Thanks, and sorry for the inconvenie
Folks,
We've had a UPS failure in the colo space where much of
the routeviews gear is housed. We're working on bringing
it all back up, but I suspect its going to be a few
minutes (like 30-45).
Thanks, and sorry for any inconvenience.
Dave
Tony/all,
> I am not going to speak for the IETF, but why would they? Their meetings are
> already open, and to be globally fair the proposed coordinators would have
> to attend 3-5 extra meetings a year to cover all the ops groups.
I am also not speaking for the IETF (IAB), but t
Christian
> On Feb 14, 2006, at 4:47 PM, David Meyer wrote:
>
> > Tony/all,
> >
> >>I am not going to speak for the IETF, but why would they? Their
> >>meetings are
> >>already open, and to be globally fair the proposed coordinators
&g
On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 07:09:38PM -0500, Christian Kuhtz wrote:
>
> David,
>
> On Feb 14, 2006, at 5:07 PM, David Meyer wrote:
> >>Hmm, well, when there is lots of vendor and academia involvement, no,
> >>there's no operator community presented in number of t
Daniel,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:51:12AM +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 01:47:31PM -0800, David Meyer wrote:
> > IETF). Now, while many in the IETF argue that there is no
> > such thing as an "operator community",
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 11:26:47AM -0600, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> > Funny that shim6 is being mentioned. The corresponding open mic session
> > at 35 showed how gathering people for 20 minutes of complaining can
> > effectively replace long, protracted email threads.
>
> and what was the effect
> It's a little more basic than that. I'm no graph theory expert and reading
> such stuff gives me a headache, but I do understand that abstraction
> (summarization or aggregation) of routing information is only possible if the
> identifiers that are used for numbering network elements (the
> "addr
stimates and demographics, some don't recognize those terms, and, a
> few just want enough Class C networks to get their job done for the day.
Yep, very true.
Dave
>
> Cutler
>
> At 2/16/2006 10:41 AM -0800, David Meyer wrote:
> One of th
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 09:38:02PM +, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
>
> Greetings all,
>
> The fuss over shim6, routing table size, and long-prefix PI space has
> intrigued me. I've started analyzing some [simulated] FIBs and believe
> I may have found something interesting. In the name of stat
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 01:54:52PM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
> On Sun, 5 Mar 2006, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
> > In the name of statistical sampling, I'd like to analyze some other
> > [simulated] FIBs from different BGP views.
> > Would anyone be interested in donating "show
Stephen,
> Thus spake "Tony Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> >>Who exactly has been trying to find scalable routing solutions?
> >
> >Well, for the last decade or so, there's been a small group of us who
> >have been working towards a new routing architecture. Primary
>
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 01:39:41PM -0400, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
>
>
> Tell you what -- I'd love to see this for every meeting, in some sore of
> official capacity.
Seconded. I found the this especially useful as I was
unable to attend this time.
--dmm
pgps1jvoVrTvd.p
Folks,
The IAB is considering holding a routing and addressing
workshop, perhaps in the fall 2006 time frame (see the
draft invite below). We're in the process of collecting
potential participants, so please pass along any the
names of folks that t
On Mon, Aug 20, 2007 at 01:50:53AM -0400, tariq biziou wrote:
> >Although I have still NOT seen any evidence to either support
> >or dispell this report, I did see this report regarding some
> >sort of "show ip bgp regexp" DoS exploit circulating on Friday:
>
>
> show ip bgp regexp (.*)(_\1)+
> V
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 06:54:27AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> it seems to be broken in a number of ways. i reported a few hours ago.
We're having problems with switch room power. We're working on
it. Sorry about the inconvenience.
Dave
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:09:56AM -0600, Ryan Harden wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Our BGP Session to them has been up and down several times over the last
> few days, but is currently up.
Yeah, the problem was power in the UO switch room power
d
I'm down in the Oregon Hall switch room and what I see is
that it appears one of the power transfer switches we had
failed and shorted out between two UPSs. Most things
are back up, with the notable exception of
archive.routeviews.org (which is fscking at t
We're back now. Please let us know ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) if you
notice anything "strange".
Thanks, and sorry again for the inconvenience.
Dave
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 02:59:47PM -0400, Derek J. Balling wrote:
> An e-mail message *can* in fact, be HTML, as HTML is a text payload
> like any other.
>
BTW, for mutt, you might try
In .mailcap:
text/html; lynx -dump -force_html %s; needsterminal; copiousoutput;
Over the next few weeks the addresses of the four Route Views
collectors in Oregon are changing:
Collector Old Address New Address
route-views.routeviews.org128.223.60.103 128.223.51.103
route-views2.routeviews.org 128.223.60.102 128.223.51.102
route-views3.routevi
> (and we are always interested in any suggestions to improve RIS)
Likewise routeviews. Let us know if there are peerings
folks would like us to pick up.
--dmm
pgpAPYKudUw2t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 03:45:07PM +, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Roland Dobbins wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mar 13, 2007, at 8:17 AM, Chris L. Morrow wrote:
> >
> > > what business drivers are there to put more bits on the wire to
> > > the end user?
> >
> > BitTorrent.
68 matches
Mail list logo
