On Jul 5, 2005, at 11:28 PM, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Todd Vierling
writes:
The default recommendation I give anyone these days is to use no
secondaries, and let the sender's mail server queue it up, as that's
the
fastest implementation path. As a second
On Jul 7, 2005, at 1:09 PM, Kuhtz, Christian wrote:
As an easy-to-read overview of the shim6 approach, the following
rough draft may be useful:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-shim6-arch-00.txt
Thanks, I'm fully aware of where shim6 is right now. I'm asking if
anyone feel
On Jul 7, 2005, at 3:41 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote:
Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
>
I'd have to counter with "the assumption that NATs are going
away with v6 is a rather risky assumption." Or perhaps I
misunderstood your point...
There is one thing often overlooked with regard to NAT. That
On Jul 8, 2005, at 12:49 PM, Jay R. Ashworth wrote:
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 01:31:57PM -0700, Crist Clark wrote:
And if you still want "the protection of NAT," any stateful firewall
will do it.
That seems a common viewpoint.
I believe the very existence of the Ping Of Death rebuts it.
A m
On Jul 12, 2005, at 1:52 PM, Phillip Vandry wrote:
How are people making the case for IPv6 with popular applications like
voice?
With G.711 and 20ms voice samples, with IPv4 you get:
20 bytes IP + 8 bytes UDP + 12 bytes RTP + 160 bytes payload
20% overhead.
40 bytes IP + 32 bytes shim6 8 by
Most of them. Cricket makes it easy to specify interface A + ... +
interface N, for instance.
-Dave
On Aug 26, 2005, at 4:32 AM, Joe Shen wrote:
Hi,
Beside monitoring in/out traffic on each egress
links, is there a tool which could provide a summary
bandwidth utilization on two or m
On Sep 26, 2005, at 3:59 PM, Joe Johnson wrote:
I'm looking for a product or script that will let us generate a
network map for use in conjunction with Nagios. We have all of the
parent/child dependencies defined in a SQL table, as well as the
current status, but I can only find progra
On Oct 20, 2005, at 5:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://nms.lcs.mit.edu/ron/ronweb/#code
(Part of my thesis work,
Hehe, google for "vixie ifdefault".
Paul's use of Squid is mentioned in this NANOG
posting:
http://www.cctec.com/maillists/nanog/historical/9702/msg00431.html
Here are
On Jan 27, 2005, at 6:39 AM, András Császár (IJ/ETH) wrote:
Hi people!
I've begun research on (carrier-grade, aka telecom-grade) resiliency
in IP transport networks. The first step would be to collect possible
failure events, their causes and consequences, statistics about
downtimes (mean time
On Jan 28, 2005, at 5:30 AM, András Császár (IJ/ETH) wrote:
Just some comments about the root causes of BGP related problems,
maybe you find something useful from the research perspective,
although probably this is not going to be new for you.
I found a few author groups with very related and u
On Jul 1, 2005, at 9:40 AM, Eric Gauthier wrote:
Dave Clark is proposing that the NSF should fund a new demonstration
network that implements a fundamentally new architecture at many
levels.
Not that I want to throw any more fire on this, but I think the
article is
talking about National L
Much of what Bill described below is already present using Nick
Feamster's bgptools release: http://nms.lcs.mit.edu/software/bgp/
bgptools/
Start with zebra / quagga / etc., which do a great job of dumping
tables and updates.
Then use bgptools to take the MRT-formatted dumps that Zebra sp
You can find the feeds we (myself and Nick Feamster) collect at the
RON testbed at
http://www.datapository.net/data/
(the two subdirs - bgpup and bgptables - should be fairly self-
explanatory.)
Note that some of the data we have in there is Abilene routing data.
While we have a faithfu
On Aug 9, 2006, at 2:15 PM, Barry Shein wrote:
I think what was being talked about was that a lot of spam now comes
as embedded images which unpack into ads for the usual stuff. It's
actually been going on for a few years but I guess as the other stuff
gets more and more effectively blocked th
On Oct 22, 2007, at 9:55 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Having now seen the cable issue described in technical detail over
and over, I have a question.
At the most recent Nanog several people talked about 100Mbps symmetric
access in Japan for $40 US.
This leads me to two questions:
1) Is that accura
On Oct 22, 2007, at 11:02 PM, Jeff Shultz wrote:
David Andersen wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/28/
AR2007082801990.html
Followed by a recent explosion in fiber-to-the-home buildout by
NTT. "About 8.8 million Japanese homes have fiber
On Apr 5, 2008, at 9:40 AM, Kevin Day wrote:
in answer to your question about SACK, it looks like they simulate
a slower
link speed for all TCP sessions that they guess are in the same
flow-bundle.
thus, all sessions in that flow-bundle see a single shared
contributed
bandwidth-delay pro
Another alternative is something we've been working on that we call
Perspectives:
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~dwendlan/perspectives/
Warning: This is a work in progress. The Mozilla plugin is a little
flaky and the paper is still being revised for the final revision for
USENIX. The SSH cod
18 matches
Mail list logo
