Ian Mason wrote:
On 6 Mar 2006, at 15:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 09:49:39AM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:17:17 +1100
Matthew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(In the
UK where I served my apprenticeship, we were required to provi
Fergie wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has released a second order
> reaffirming its decision to require that broadband and certain VoIP services
> be designed to make government wiretapping easier. This new order was issued
> despite the fact that a federal
Darden, Patrick S. wrote:
I'm looking for documentation on how the US Government IPv6 mandate affects
associated agencies--e.g. healthcare providers, non-profits, or any company
that depends on US Gvt. funding, record keeping, or financial reimbursement for
services rendered (e.g. via Medica
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.einstein-website.de/z_kids/letterskids.html
That's cute Valdis, but did the little girl and Einstein force thousands of
people around the world to read their correspondence? I whole-heartily
encourage and thank anyone willing to
Thanks Randy, (seriously, I get questions such as those all the time)
I was beginning to think NANOG was still stuck in the 2002 or something
:-) You surely know the parable "the shoemakers kids are the last to
get shoes" as my own 'lab' full of toys/stuff is the last to get
upgraded and lab
William Herrin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Sargun Dhillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
from a viewpoint of hardware,
x86 is a fairly decent platform. I can stuff 40 (4x10GigE multiplex with
a switch) 1 GigE ports in it. Though, the way that Linux works, it
cannot handle high pac
