> Don't get me wrong, I think Equinix offers the best carrier neutral colo
Aha. Perhaps you've not experienced Telehouse in NYC yet?
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
So, the Friday of Exodus de-peering has passed.
First of all, has it happened?
Second, is there any operational comment on what its affects, if anything?
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http
;t reply to this section of the message.
Reply to me personally if you want to compare some things.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
(delayed response -- was on vacation).
We lost a T1 to Boston riding on Atlantic Media / Lightwave for > 36
hours.
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, German Martinez wrote:
>
> Is somebody affected with this outage ?
>
> http://west-boot.mfnx.net/traffic/issues.txt
>
>
>
t; CEF works like a charm -- the load is never split by more than 45-55 and
> >> that's damn good for wire speed hashing in my view.
> >
> >> We used CEF in 11.x and it behaved the same way. It was never round-robin
> >> in any way we could observe.
> >
I'm trolling for newspeers, if there is anyone out there still using
NNTP..
If interested, email me a traceroute to www.nac.net, and we'll get things
rolling.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-M
> Tier-1 means what?
Lately, 'Tier-1' and '[near] bankruptcy' seem to be interchangable.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
d, but from where I'm sitting it's hard to judge whether
> > > others are important or marginal.
> > >
> > >- To how many of them do typical tier-1 and tier-2 networks connect?
> > >
> > >- Using private or public interconnects?
> >
> >
> >
>
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
On Fri, 17 May 2002, ren wrote:
>
> That depends on your corporate needs for power, security, remote hands,
> etc. The extended services found at Equinix & PAIX are very important for
> many networks.
Of which Telehouse seems to better than all the others, on all fronts.
--
ected to SIX.
Good point. Folks running the NAPs have to realize that in this day,
you can buy relatively good transit in the $50 to $200/meg range. This
makes getting capacity to, colo'ing at, and paying for NAP port cost more
than transit, in many cases. IIX is the only exchange point th
this can
take so long.
> We aren't silly, and since it would be silly to fail to recognize that some
> peers want/need different service levels than others, we recognized it and
> are acting on it.
Can you elaborate on this?
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], laten
On Fri, 17 May 2002, todd glassey wrote:
>
> Mitch what has MFN's financial problems have to do with the quality of the
> agreements that are in place for peering.
Easy. It fills, and then no one wants to pay to increase it.
If I am not mistaken, this has happened alrea
ated' person. I'm sure if the bank's network operator noticed it,
> > and contacted you, things would have been cleared up with no harm done. To
>
> It sounds like you know something that I don't. How do you find out the
> contact information for someone given only an
manipulation/packet sniffing, a PC might have
> the edge. :)
Yes, ipfw/dummy is very very cool. Like, inducing a few 100 msecs of
latency to folks who don't pay on time :)
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
gt; Ethernet ports or six line-rate OC-3 ports (in theory, anyway). But not
> really enough for anything faster (OC-12 or GigE) if you want line-rate
> forwarding.
Most reputable motherboards (high-end super micros, intel) support 64/66.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PRO
>And making it *write-only* as the original poster asked, would fix things
> >how?
>
>
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
atriotism is defined as the last
> resort of the scoundrel. With all due respect to an enlightened but
> inferior lexicographer I beg to submit that it is the first.
> -- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
/meg,
and thats assuming a 95th utilization of 155.
Assuming a more real world utilization of 120 mb/s, at best, you're at
$83/meg, somewhat more expensive than what several providers are selling
at these days.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--
one
a wide variety of tests to rule out the local equipment (MSFC2s, FYI).
Any clues would be exceptional.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
there been more than 311mbits? If yes: drop.
Except, we're at the levels of 100 kbit/second in our tests.
I did just find CSCdr94172, which might be related.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
exactly they are limiting the pipe? When
> dealing with 300 or so megs, I doubt they will be shaping with a policy
> friendly to you, as the logistics of doing so are a bit difficult.
By strapping 1 or more STS-1's to the GE iface.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e doing this?
Hybrid or integrated?
>
> good luck!
>
> Peter Hill
> Network Engineer
> Carnegie Mellon University
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
-0500, Rob Healey wrote:
> >
> >
> > How big is the global BGP table running these days?
> >
> > 100K? 110K? Bigger?
> >
> > -Rob
>
> --
> Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~ja
Fax : 703-293-9609
> e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.multicasttech.com
>
> Test your network for multicast :
> http://www.multicasttech.com/mt/
>
>
> > I'm on a National Academy of Sciences committee looking at how the
> > Internet fared on 9/11 and we're always in search of good comparative
> > data.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Craig Partridge
> > Chief Scientist, BBN Technologies
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
oss,
during business hours.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Derek Samford wrote:
>
> There was some mail being tossed around earlier about Cogent
> having latency. I'm actually seeing this on PSINet (Now owned by
> Cogent.) Is anyone else still seeing the latency they were experie
le would be thinking of adding
> another ds3 at that point.
>
> Bri
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Phil Rosenthal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Alex Rubenstein'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
27;
Which must work very well for those DS3's doing 10 to 20 mb/s. Do you
upgrade those to OC3 or beyond?
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
cting.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> > 40mb/s isn't "loaded" for a DS3?
>
> if you are measuring 40mb at five min intervals, micro peaks are pegged out
> causing serious packet loss.
>
> randy
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PRO
min graph but also separate line showing
> those micro burst and actual peak usage?
>
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> >
> > > 40mb/s isn't "loaded" for a DS3?
> >
> > if you are measuring 40mb at five min intervals, micro peaks a
the best
way to do this is to blast SNMP requests, and wait for replies which are
then event driven; wait 10 seconds, retry all the ones we get, then try
again. We've found that this works the best, having tried about 4
different ways of doing it over the last 5 years. It's all then nic
nyone know of a 'back-box' that will take standard 1310 or
1550 nm signal, and 'convert' it to an ITU grid?
Any pointers, help, or a kick in arse would be appreciated.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corpora
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Nenad Trifunovic wrote:
> Can you, please, explain why you didn't consider Frame Relay
> based exchange in your analysis?
I'd imagine because no real 'high-speed' FR switch exists (as in, oc12 or
above).
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMA
Mikael Abrahamssonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
exchange itself.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
global internet, and thinking
that recalling a message would work?
/action crawls back into his hole
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
cern for anyone
outside of your network. Why don't you advertise the /16 via BGP and
then let the IGP handle the /22 distribution to each city?
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
he
moment. You could always filter.
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
duled to go down, in
keeping with the general decommissioning of analog AMPS, during this
calendar year, as I understand it.
It was extended because of a couple of large PD's who needed more time
to switch (or amortize their gear; take your pick).
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL
indoor GPS and other locator service.
<http://www.gpsworld.com/gpsworld/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=3053>
If you can put a locator into a cellphone, I see no reason why you cannot do
the same in a VoIP unit.
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Ac
working
inside the terminal building.
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
e air for small aircraft
pilots, then why wouldn't it work for cellphones? The
last known fix should be 100% up to date and 100% useless.
--Michael Dillon
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
Interesting.
About 1 year ago (early 2004), in a one month period, we had every
single MCI outstanding billing dispute resolved -- some even that were
over 4 years old. It seemed to me that the dispute resolution people
actually gave a hoot all of a sudden. And, some inside information I
glean
this is a good thing, sometimes, it's not.
It seems that the A RR has been pulled around 2005-08-30 21:00 UTC, so
this particular issue has already been resolved.
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fe
Orleans for the time being.
-M<
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
. :)
And just when I was about to release http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras/failure.jpg :)
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
to be able to get to the Internet
through them. Isn't that the business they are in?
-doug
--
Matthew S. Crocker
Vice President
Crocker Communications, Inc.
Internet Division
PO BOX 710
Greenfield, MA 01302-0710
http://www.crocker.com
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
l then become further fun when a unwise,
uneducated judge in a court of equity will enter a status-quo injunction,
forcing the two parties to peer.
Tis what we need: court enforced peering.
I can't imagine how this could happen, however.
(please be sure you detected the sarcasm in
the love of god, do not make analogies to the phone network.
Call me crazy if you'd like, but I tend to think that peering on the
Internet is too important...
Do you think a thread which has made 100 posts on nanog, with people
coming out of the woodwork who I haven't seen in years, is
reliable? Can be open
source, we're using MRTG to track utilization but we need something that
really handles "accounting" for us.
Thanks,
-Drew
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
ge? How greatly did the outage affect you or your
customers? Was this an unusually large event?
Thanks,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
Regarding http://www.nanog.org/mtg-0501/coordination.html -- can someone
comment on who will from MERIT/NANOG will be present, and what the
moderation will be? What is the intended agenda for this meeting?
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net
correctly!
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
ish SBC would follow suit. :-/
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050418/D89I0KP00.html
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
Sprint/United, Warwick Valley
Telephone, SBC-SNET, Citizens-Frontier, RCI-Frontier.
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
iner wrote:
On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Fergie (Paul Ferguson) wrote:
One might wonder if Qwest is a little upset about being
rebuffed by MCI in its efforts to merge the two companies.
http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/11426726.htm
Smells like sour grapes to me....
jms
--
Alex Rubenstein, A
s.
As this point, consider them an ally.
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
guson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
..?
- ferg
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
No to nit picks, but do zip codes share the same boundaries as
municipalities?
How about an anycast address implement(ed|able) by every network
provider that would return a zipcode?
$ telnet 10.255.255.254
Connected
33709
Disconnected.
$
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL
pay for it, some of the CLECs would add batteries. But
it wasn't part of the base package.
All the AT&T pops usually have nice battery and gen sets. That's what I like.
Dee
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
"put your stuff here, or don't sell to us."
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
information (SMTP).
I am not sure any level of security would make me feel good about passing
my emails through a 'peering .. core' of SMTP relays.
However, if we do go in this direction, I plan on firing up my old copies
of BinkleyTerm. FIDO and NetMail may be a good place
which of these candidates actually work
# at an isp or large content provider?
#
# randy
Better yet, what about links to resumes/backgrounds?
/herb
--
Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben
Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net
gt; ><>
> Nathan Stratton
> nathan at robotics.net
> http://www.robotics.net
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
s them to keep their service level consistent. One-offs can end
> up being expensive in the long run. "If I do it for you, everyone will want
> the same thing!"
>
> --
> Michael L. Barrow
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]P: 805-566-0885
>
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97,
, rather than a percentile system (50th percentile is
NOT the same as, or even relevant to, average).
c) counting bytes: $x per y bytes.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
I am looking for a manufacturer of telco cages used in datacenter
applications; any pointers would be appreciated.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
u use ethernet, at the edges of your network you HAVE to
> route IP blocks to the ethernet.
>
> -Ralph
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
esses in the routed subnet?
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Ralph Doncaster wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
>
> > I've been doing ip route statements going on 8 years now, and I can't
> > imagine why ever -- and how it would even work -- you'd want to ip r
a trap for address-harvesting spambots.
> Do NOT send mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, or you are likely to
> be blocked.
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
registry may either handle the request or refer the request to an
appropriate registry.
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Charles H. Gucker wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 06:56:22PM -0500, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> >
> > If they were singly homed to Aleron, technically,
http://biz.yahoo.com/djus/021113/0217000178_2.html
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
t; network integration.
Primarily because it is not interactive.
The ones that are interactive are not ubiquotous.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
flywheel leaves your home when the bearings sieze.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
nter to keep it liquid instead of solid, decontamination chemicals
> > (cant have any Leigonella bacillus growing in there in the summer) Its all
> > moot, as the weight factor makes this a non-starter.
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
to be a simple device. Perhaps it would
have more than one FE port, and you'd map PVC's to ports, or whatever. The
key is that this totally transparent, and able to pass 802.1q vlan tags.
It'd be used in a point-to-point topology only.
Any clues would be great.
-- Alex Rubenstein,
; Any hands-on experiences or 3rd party performance statistics are most
> welcome.
>
> Thank you,
> jeff
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
as I do not want to clutter
the list with extraneous traffic. All replies will be kept confidential.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
c12's onto it? Perhaps oc48-cwdm out the back?
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
t; information on what is happening (if you know) would be great. Thanks!
>
> -hc
>
>
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 01:50:34 -0500
From: Tim Yocum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTE
Claranet UK Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Systems Administrator020 7903 3246 http://www.clara.net
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
en so bad for one of
>my edge routers that i cant telnet into it.
> >But i am on Qwest and GBLX.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alex Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Sat 1/25/2003 1:04 AM
> > To: hc
> > Cc: [E
work that were generating massive amounts of
> traffic, all of which run MS SQL.
>
> --
> Blaine Kahle
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 0x178AA0E0
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> show firewall filter proactive-filter
NameBytes Packets
mssql-drops 916252204 2267951
term NO-MSSQL {
from {
packet-length 40
who just posted to this list made it abundantly clear that
they don't have a firewall in front of at least one MS SQL server on their
network. Should you really have port 1433/4 open to the world? Would you
do this with a MySql server?
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency
ed the readily available and widely announced
patches (as zealously as unix folks patch thier stuff), this'd be all
moot, and we'd all have gotten a better nights sleep.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
2002 and was also part of SQL Server SP3
> >
> >
>
> Has it been verified that the mid-2002/SP3 patches work? I haven't heard
> anything difinitive on this yet.
>
> Jack Bates
> Network Engineer
> BrightNet Oklahoma
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
was taking
advantage of a vulnerability detected six months ago in Microsoft sequel
servers, used mainly by companies to store information.
Then, first tombstone:
MORE NEWS
Gates pledges better software security
HAHAHAH
(props to troy corbin for this)
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL
nt made by BoA, based upon assumptions which are
probably correct, to be very scary.
Comments?
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
that if
> you have SP3 on your windows2000 server you will not be infected with
> SQLSlammer, this is absolutely NOT true, I have a box with sp3 and it IS
> infected.
>
> -Drew
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
.135.133.228(1434), 1 packet
> Jan 24 22:29:59 c6509-core 10966981: 47w1d: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 130
> denied udp 17.193.12.215(3117) -> 207.135.155.209(1434), 1 packet
> Jan 24 22:30:00 border 7577873: 30w2d: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 100 denied
> udp 209.15.147.225(4543) -> 204.228.133.186(1434), 1 packet
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
; ISOMEDIA.COM - Premium Internet Services(425) 869-9437 Fax
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.isomedia.com
>
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
statement made by BoA, based upon assumptions which are
probably correct, to be very scary.
Comments?
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
ak to evil of them --
actually, there are some good people over there).
However, it appears that one of the 'root' boxes of this attack was at HE.
This is the third or fourth time I've seen theit netblocks mentioned as
the source of some of the first packets.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97,
> While it's possible that _none_ of the vulnerable servers have _any_
> 'personal information', I'd venture to guess otherwise.
Agreed. And, even if it is super encrypted, who cares? Enough CPU and time
will take care of that.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMA
ic was not prioritized, it therefore suffered collateral
> damage primarily due to traffic not being able to get through between
> ATM's and the central processing center.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
for news that is satellite based.
> Can anyone offer any suggestions
> and or recommendations? All information is appreciated!
>
> Regards,
> Jeff
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.459
isco 15216, for example?
Thanks..
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
most be held responsible for $50.
Which is a 'feature' of most credit cards, irrelevant to criminal law.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, [EMAIL PROTECTED], latency, Al Reuben --
--Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
