Anyone noticed any odd behavior with gmail? Particularly in the last few
weeks?
Particularly, we're seeing gmail deliver multiple instances of a message
from a gmail subscriber to a mailing list server...
The following post gives as much info as i've been able to collate to
date:
http://
This report has been generated at Fri Feb 10 21:47:00 2006 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table Hist
(I'm not claiming to be local to Dallas, but thought I'd point this out.)
Most folks know that odd-numbered Interstate Highways run North/South.
I-35 runs through Dallas, and through Fort Worth. If you fly into DFW,
your travel will likely run along part of I-35. Here's the kicker: I-35
spl
On 2/10/06, Mark Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyone noticed any odd behavior with gmail? Particularly in the last few
> weeks?
>
> Particularly, we're seeing gmail deliver multiple instances of a message
> from a gmail subscriber to a mailing list server...
>
> The following post gives a
Mark Owen wrote:
On 2/10/06, Mark Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Particularly, we're seeing gmail deliver multiple instances of a message
from a gmail subscriber to a mailing list server...
Well, doubled instances, yes. Multiple instances, no.
http://www.linux.net.nz/pipermail
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Mark Foster wrote:
At this stage i'm being forced to moderate any gmail-using-subscriber, it may
be that we need to forbid gmail.com entirely.
If the message contains the same message-id which it sounds like it
should, it should be really easy to filter. If majordomo o
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 11:49:55PM -0600, brokaw price said something to the
effect of:
>
> If you're considering bringing your sweetie to NANOG and you're worried
> about how she might not be so keen on 4 days of acronyms and alphabet soup,
Hey!
I presume you weren't meaning to alienate the
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> And then a few other well chosen blocklists (not the "block all traffic
> from a country" variety at all)
These days, a lot of smallish ISP's are blocking CNNIC and/or KRNIC space
wholesale.
As for CN, the truth of the matter is, the Golden S
Anyone else notice any oddities? I've had about 20 complaints
from Comcast customers whom host with us (and associated trace routes)
showing that their traffic cannot correctly traverse ATT to get through
Global Crossing to my network.
Thanks,
-Drew
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 11 Feb, 2006
Drew,
So you have a ticket open with GBLX and they said what exactly?
Guy
--On February 10, 2006 11:29:36 AM -0500 Todd Vierling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
And then a few other well chosen blocklists (not the "block all traffic
from a country" variety at all)
These days, a lot of smallish ISP's are blocking C
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Gary Wardell wrote:
Hi,
I've seen one or two blogs that suggest gmail has a potential as a source for
anonymous SPAM and other abuses.
One said he blocks all gmail.
I'd be interested as to what others think.
Well after I posted to NANOG about gmail I found myself r
On 10-Feb-2006, at 13:43, Mark Foster wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Gary Wardell wrote:
I've seen one or two blogs that suggest gmail has a potential as a
source for anonymous SPAM and other abuses.
One said he blocks all gmail.
I'd be interested as to what others think.
Well after I pos
On 2/10/06, Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are not alone. And since I was subscribed twice (each from
> different addresses) I suspect this is not the only list that has
> been scraped for subscriber addresses.
>
>
> Joe
Another "me too", though I've only experienced this one time on
Thanks to all who emailed both on and offlist.
I've been advised that there were definately multiple people from NANOG
affected (aka 'subscribed')by the google groups thing and that Google
were promptly been heads-upped by some kind soul on NANOG who have since
zapped the group concerned into
16 matches
Mail list logo
