John Levine wrote:
Moving sshd from port 22 to port 137, 138 or 139. Nasty eh?
don't do that! Lots of (access) isps around the world (esp here in
Europe) block those ports
If you're going to move sshd somewhere else, port 443 is a fine
choice. Rarely blocked, rarely probed by ss
This report has been generated at Fri Nov 18 21:46:21 2005 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of an AS4637 (Reach) router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org/as4637 for a current version of this report.
Recent Table Hist
Hello all,
I apologize if this is deemed off topic, but I think there is enough
content to warrant the question.
Some time ago there was a lively discussion about SMS paging and the
providers for that in relation to emergency operations NMS paging etc.
Who can point me in the direction of the sti
Matthew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John Levine wrote:
>
Moving sshd from port 22 to port 137, 138 or 139. Nasty eh?
>>>don't do that! Lots of (access) isps around the world (esp here in
>>>Europe) block those ports
>>>
>>
>>If you're going to move sshd somewhere else, port 44
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> I'm curious what would happen if an ISP tried blocking P2P apps under that
> section, however. Sure, a lot of it's illegal, but not all of it. Could
> "gross overuse of bandwidth" be considered a threat to the network's
> reliability, or would the st
Hi,
Anyone got any comments about how good or otherwise the Cisco 7200 +
NPE-G1 or 7301, both with 1GB of RAM, is as a eBGP router + L2TP
terminator for DSL subs, in terms of scalability for bandwidth through
put & the number of VPDN sessions it can terminate before it dies. Are
the two solution
anyone at seattle westin have something that talks serial so
i can deal with a freaked 2511 oob through its console?
randy
I'd stick with what you know unless you plan to terminate hundreds
of thousands of things in which case cisco isn't a great choice. They
two platforms are similar but 7301 is relatively new. Anything new from
cisco
I recommend to avoid for atleast a year so that you aren't an alpha
tester.
> ---
> Anything new from cisco I recommend to avoid
> for atleast a year so that you aren't an alpha tester.
Or any vendor actually :-)
Neil.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.3/174 - Release Date: 17/11/2005
On Fri, 18 Nov 2005, Neil J. McRae wrote:
I'd stick with what you know unless you plan to terminate hundreds
of thousands of things in which case cisco isn't a great choice. They
two platforms are similar but 7301 is relatively new. Anything new from
cisco
I recommend to avoid for atleast a ye
Dear Randy:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randy Bush) [Fri 18 Nov 2005, 18:40 CET]:
anyone at seattle westin have something that talks serial so
i can deal with a freaked 2511 oob through its console?
Don't you agree that this would be more appropriate on cisco-nsp@ ?
Best regards,
-- Niels
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
Daily listings are sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you have any comments please contact Philip Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Routing Table Report 04:00 +10GMT Sat 19 Nov, 2005
On Nov 18, 2005, at 10:11 AM, Niels Bakker wrote:
Dear Randy:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Randy Bush) [Fri 18 Nov 2005, 18:40 CET]:
anyone at seattle westin have something that talks serial so i can
deal with a freaked 2511 oob through its console?
Don't you agree that this would be more approp
Possibly, other than cisco users have serial laptops at the westin?
randy
___
sent from a handheld, so even more terse than usual :-)
> The two platforms are similar but 7301 is relatively new. Anything
> new from cisco I recommend to avoid for at least a year.
Yeah, I'd agree with the principle here, but the 7301 has been out for
several years, I've got a bunch of them in the field, and they're the most
stable route
The North American Network Operators' Group (NANOG) will hold its
36th meeting February 12-15, in Dallas, Texas. The meeting will be
hosted by Yahoo.
NANOG conferences provide a forum for information exchange among
network operators, engineers, and researchers. Meetings are held
three times each
"Ben Butler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone got any comments about how good or otherwise the Cisco 7200 +
> NPE-G1 or 7301, both with 1GB of RAM, is as a eBGP router + L2TP
> terminator for DSL subs, in terms of scalability for bandwidth through
> put & the number of VPDN sessions it can t
17 matches
Mail list logo
