Amen, brother. ;-)
- ferg
-- Chris Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For those outside the state or the US, Texas has some very odd
political traditions and laws that are beyond explanation in email.
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECT
Susan,
In light of Geoff Huston's recent article which urged alacrity in finalizing
a standard and implementing the eventual solution, where are we in this
process? Geoff's article suggest that we have about three years until
Internet transit AS's should begin transitioning. Given the QA cycle at
Here is an article that addresses some of these very
issues, naturally there is always a costing factor,
because non of the sought for solutions are easy to
come by.
http://www.networkcomputing.com/showitem.jhtml?docid=1616f3
-Henry
--- Daniel Senie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At 12:41 P
Sweet, got my first piece of phishing SPAM (to the
address I use for this list) shortly after posting a couple of days
ago.
Steve
Initial caveat: If this is off topic please just let me know now and
please suggest a good forum for this type of question/discussion.
The main premise of the question/discussion is the ability to
establish/utilize random (or not so) test points (like looking
glasses) scattered across the p
Daniel,
> Susan,
>
> In light of Geoff Huston's recent article which urged alacrity in finalizing
> a standard and implementing the eventual solution, where are we in this
> process? Geoff's article suggest that we have about three years until
> Internet transit AS's should begin transitioning.
news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050824/ap_on_hi_te/internet_phones_e911
- ferg
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
> The time it would take it to be deployed depends (among other
> factors) on whether the IDR WG would reach a (rough) consensus on
> moving forward with the existing spec, even if one may argue that
> there could be a better alternative to the existing spec.
I don't think we're that short of tim
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 05:10:09PM -0700, Steve Gibbard wrote:
> This is a mailing list for the wrong sort of network for this question,
> but...
You're correct. :-)
comp.dcom.telecom.tech or alt.dcom.telecom are better places to find
this sort of person, or at least, they used to be.
Cheers,
On 23 Aug 2005, at 17:04 , Michael Painter wrote:
US is trailing other industrial countries in broadband penetration
I'm not sure that's the case, AFAIK the US holds its own.
Graph at the bottom of the article.
http://www.mbc-thebridge.com/viewbridge.cfm?instance_id=304
And what does every
On 24-Aug-2005, at 19:16, Lewis Butler wrote:
And what does every country ahead of the US have in common? Tiny
populations.
And waht does every country but one have in common? Very small
area. The US has states taht are larger than 10 of the 11
countries ahed of use, COMBINED.
(popu
- Original Message Follows -
From: "Scott Weeks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Announcement Propagation Delay in BGP
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:22:15 -1000
> I am going to be announcing two new prefixs into BGP soon
> and the netgeek in me is very curious as to the lengt
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
I don't think we're that short of time that any problems with the
spec should be put aside, we'll have to work with the results for
some time.
It's no good expressing these opinions here though, please give
feedback on IDR.
There's been very
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Joe Abley wrote:
> So, of the 11 countries that the OECD thinks have greater broadband
> penetration than the USA, 6 are more densely-populated than the USA
> and 5 are not.
I wonder how they figure population density... Is it just a matter of
land area divided by the numbe
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 07:15:44PM -0600, Sean Figgins wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> > So, of the 11 countries that the OECD thinks have greater broadband
> > penetration than the USA, 6 are more densely-populated than the USA
> > and 5 are not.
>
> I wonder how they figu
On 8/24/05 7:38 PM, "Joe Abley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 24-Aug-2005, at 19:16, Lewis Butler wrote:
>
>> And what does every country ahead of the US have in common? Tiny
>> populations.
>>
>> And waht does every country but one have in common? Very small
>> area. The US has state
On 24-Aug-2005, at 22:43, Dan Golding wrote:
I suggest you take another look at these numbers. Those countries with
overall population densities lower than the US's all have something in
common - they are really cold. Iceland, Canada, Finland, Norway,
Sweden.
Folks in those countries are dens
> Not that this necessarily means anything, but I thought your
> sentiments above could do with some numbers.
prejudices and sentiments are immune to numbers
randy
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Jared Mauch wrote:
> I once spoke to a construction manager at comcast for their
> network buildouts. With my local township, they need to have 20 homes
> per linear mile along the route to justify a build. While my street
> has 11 homes, and 3 adjacent (where my priv
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Daniel Golding wrote:
I suggest you take another look at these numbers. Those countries with
overall population densities lower than the US's all have something in
common - they are really cold. Iceland, Canada, Finland, Norway, Sweden.
Folks in those countries are densely
20 matches
Mail list logo
