Re: Rip again!

2005-08-23 Thread Crist Clark
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Morris Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 9:21 AM To: 'Tom Sanders'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Rip again! How about the source IP? RIP v1 is sent to 255.255.255.255 broadcast. RIPv2 is sent to 224.0.0.9 multicast. Both are local-link only, so won'

RE: Rip again!

2005-08-21 Thread Chris Ranch
MAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Rip again! > > > How about the source IP? > > RIP v1 is sent to 255.255.255.255 broadcast. RIPv2 is sent > to 224.0.0.9 multicast. Both are local-link only, so won't > go THROUGH a router. The sending source IP will tell you >

RE: Rip again!

2005-08-21 Thread Scott Morris
gain, Cisco world you can use "no validate-update-source" to override this check) But that gives you a tracking method on packets. Scott -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Sanders Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2005 12:13 PM To: [

Rip again!

2005-08-21 Thread Tom Sanders
Hi, There isnt IMO a way in RIP to identify the source of the RIP packet (the way we have Router ID in OSPF, system ID in ISIS, etc.) Now assume we have 2 vlans defined on an ethernet. Thus we would have two IP interfaces, 1.1.1.1/24 and 2.2.2.2/24 and both using the same physical interface. RIP