- Original Message Follows -
From: "Scott Weeks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Announcement Propagation Delay in BGP
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:22:15 -1000
> I am going to be announcing two new prefixs into BGP soon
> and the netgeek in me is very curious as to the lengt
* Pete Templin:
> Non-scientific test, but I've seen new prefixes appear at the Oregon-IX
> route server in <20 seconds (we're only in Texas), and reach a modestly
> steady state in <90 seconds. I've seen adjustments (prepending, etc.)
> appear in 45+ seconds, and withdraws in probably the sa
- Original Message Follows -
From: Jeroen Massar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Announcement Propagation Delay in BGP
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:58:08 +0200
> On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 10:22 -1000, Scott Weeks wrote:
> >
> >
- Original Message Follows -
From: Pete Templin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: Announcement Propagation Delay in BGP
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:33:52 -0500
> Scott Weeks wrote:
> > I am going to be announcing two new prefixs in
Scott Weeks wrote:
I am going to be announcing two new prefixs into BGP soon
and the netgeek in me is very curious as to the length of
time it takes to show up in other parts of the world that're
logically far from Hawaii. Instead of going to
www.traceroute.org and refreshing repeatedly, I thou
On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 10:22 -1000, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
>
> I am going to be announcing two new prefixs into BGP soon
> and the netgeek in me is very curious as to the length of
> time it takes to show up in other parts of the world that're
> logically far from Hawaii. Instead of going to
> www.
