Hi,
Hope we all had a great Christmas!
I am trying to run a query that selects a member every 365 days so we
can send them a domain reminder.
For my test (because i'm too lazy to count out someone with hundreds of
days :) ) I am using a known member at around 27/28 days
Now if I use this if finds
Thanks, that's exactly what I was after.
On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 14:53 -0800, Daevid Vincent wrote:
> Perhaps the examples here would help you:
> http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/date-calculations.html
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Noel Butler [mai
does this list not have a dickhead filter?
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 15:17 +, Ganeswar Mishra wrote:
> Hi
>
> Please click on the link below and enter your birthday for me. I am creating
> a birthday calendar for myself. Don't worry, it'll take less than a minute
> (and you don't have to ent
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 16:27 -0700, Tim Gustafson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure if this is already an open issue or not - a Google search
> resulted in various discussions but I didn't find any open support/feature
> request.
>
> It would be really handy if during the "create database" statemen
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 07:38 -0400, David Stoltz wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> I'm currently using phpMyAdmin to manage the mySQL databases. I'm
> wondering what most people like to use? I know there is "mySQL
> Workbench", which I haven't really fooled with yet
>
command line (mysql prompt
On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 14:06 +0200, Sergey Lazurenko wrote:
> Hello! Hello! I'd like to place basic information about our products. I'll
> be appreciate you.
>
> Best Regards,
> Sergey Lazurenko
> --
> MySQL General Mailing List
> For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
> To unsubscribe
Hi Joerg,
On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 18:59 +0100, Joerg Bruehe wrote:
> Hi Noel, all!
>
>
> Noel Butler wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 10:08 -0300, Alejandro Bednarik wrote:
> >> You are right. In previous version init script have a default value, now is
> >
In all previous versions we were able to run -Aao --auto-repair
Anyone know WHY, in 5.5, -a and -o , must be run separately, this
is kind of silly I think, requiring two passes now.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 14:50 +0200, Michael Widenius wrote:
> Hi!
>
> >>>>> "Noel" == Noel Butler writes:
>
> Noel> In all previous versions we were able to run -Aao --auto-repair
>
> Noel> Anyone know WHY, in 5.5, -a and -o , mus
Arg! This abomination 5.5 is causing more headaches,
postfix will not run, I've heard dovecot may not either, amongst others
postconf: /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.16: no version information
available (required by postcon
/etc/init.d/postfix start
* Starting Postfix Mail Transport Agent postfi
ain daemons, i don't trust distro butchers ,
err, i mean maintainers, for these critical apps.
thanks anyway.
>
> Am 31.01.2011 09:24, schrieb Noel Butler:
> >
> > Arg! This abomination 5.5 is causing more headaches,
> >
> > postfix will not run, I
out open source, each to
their own.
when there is only one version of the lib installed it should not be an
issue, I've been building tarballs for 20 years, so do understand how
the OS works and how to best use configure :)
> Am 31.01.2011 11:38, schrieb Noel Butler:
> > On M
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 13:51 +0100, Johan De Meersman wrote:
> Umm... I'm no crypto guru, but I've never heard of MD5 having variants, let
> alone a salt. MD5 is MD5 is MD5. APR, incidentally, is the Apache Runtime,
> afaik - part of the build kit for apache modules.
>
> I strongly suspect your
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 06:14 -0500, Johnny Withers wrote:
> right speed and duplex. It seems that every new server I get now has
> to have the speed and duplex explicitly set instead of auto negotiate.
>
Many of the cisco switches are notorious for this.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
People, most of you are/should be professionals.
It is about time your mail servers were configured to never send "out of
office" bullshit replies in response to mailing list messages.
I realise this is difficult here and is oracles fault for running an
abandonware mail server (qmail) and antiquat
List is broken, in many ways.
Amongst many of its failures, the two current biggest is:
1/ This lists bounce messages are clueless they do not include the
reject reason
2/ mysql-owner address STILL points to a sun address which of course is
rejected as they no longer host this list.
*sigh*
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 03:40 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 18.05.2012 02:51, schrieb Noel Butler:
> > List is broken, in many ways.
> >
> > Amongst many of its failures, the two current biggest is:
> >
> > 1/ This lists bounce messages are clueless they do
That was nice of oracle to announce this wasn't it ...(/sarcasm)
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 16:35 -0400, Shawn Green wrote:
> On 6/28/2012 9:41 PM, Hank wrote:
> > I am in the process of reporting a new MySQL bug in 5.5.25 (doesn't
> > exist in 5.5.24) - see: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=6574
On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 11:34 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> That was nice of oracle to announce this wasn't it ...(/sarcasm)
>
not to mention source of 25a can not be found anywhere on any mirror I
looked at, or the download page
fucking hopeless
>
> On Fri, 2012-06-
I wonder if you would have the same opinion to say your Operating System
environment, Apache, php, any mainstream server daemon, how about they
pull the current version for a serious bug, but dont tell anyone...
Oracle have been quick to announce new releases of mysql, but failed to
issue a notic
shows incompetenceon the
part of the software developer, not the users.
On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 14:15 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> I wonder if you would have the same opinion to say your Operating
> System environment, Apache, php, any mainstream server daemon, how
> about they pull the c
Shaun,
Is this option planned for backport into 5.5.x ?
Cheers
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 10:57 +0100, Sebastien FLAESCH wrote:
> I have several versions of MySQL installed on my Linux, and it appears
> that the libmysqlclient versions have changed in the 5.x version line:
>
> /opt3/dbs/mys/4.1.24/lib/libmysqlclient.so.14
> /opt3/dbs/mys/5.0.90/lib/libmysqlclien
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 21:35 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 18.03.2013 21:01, schrieb Rick James:
> > 20 is plenty if your pages run fast enough
>
> if your server can not serve more than 20 simultaionous
> requests you are not doing any serious things
>
or he's using a 286
signatu
On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 16:18 +, attee...@gmail.com wrote:
> You don't have to be a jackass to him/her.
>
He's always a jackass, but, I must say, it is a rare occasion that I
agree, and, hte *idiot* who posted all those lines was certainly more of
a jackass.
> The CAN SPAM act requires that
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 10:41 +0200, Sebastien FLAESCH wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 07/31/2013 01:03 PM, Sunanda Menon wrote:
> > * The C API libmysqlclient shared-library .so files now have
> > version 18.1.0 (up from version 18.0.0 used in MySQL 5.5).
> > (Bug #16809055)
>
> W
I thought someone, even Monty, would have chimed in here, but...
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 16:28 +1000, Nick Edwards wrote:
> Question, is building the source exactly the same as mysql?
yes
> Meaning, if I build it with set CMAKE options building mysql, can I
> use those exact same options buildi
27 matches
Mail list logo
