timing

2003-01-30 Thread Mary Stickney
d the server is a faster machine then mine. They run in 8 minutes on my test server , about 4 minutes each. Printing to a PDF driver. On the Production Server they take HOURS to run and print. Any ideas... Mary Stickney TAG-TMI Data Warehouse Programmer 402-474-7612 x 3099 [EMAIL PROT

RE: timing

2003-01-30 Thread Mary Stickney
no it is dedicated to the DataWarehouse Report Processor. runs one report at a time from a ReportQueue. both have a local host. Mary Stickney TAG-TMI Data Warehouse Programmer 402-474-7612 x 3099 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Goodie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent

RE: timing

2003-01-30 Thread Mary Stickney
one other thing , the girl that made them did it with an Access database copy of the warehouse. I changed the connection to the real Datawarehouse. if that makes any difference Mary Stickney TAG-TMI Data Warehouse Programmer 402-474-7612 x 3099 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message

RE: timing

2003-01-30 Thread Mary Stickney
queue and runs the reports one at a time and emails them out. Outlook Express is running in order to email the PDF files to the recipient. I can understand it being SOME slower , but not hours slower. Mary Stickney TAG-TMI Data Warehouse Programmer 402-474-7612 x 3099 [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: timing

2003-01-30 Thread Mary Stickney
oh and my test server is my PC , so I had all kinds o crap running on it at the same time. Mary Stickney TAG-TMI Data Warehouse Programmer 402-474-7612 x 3099 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Jennifer Goodie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:57 PM

RE: timing

2003-01-31 Thread Mary Stickney
thanks. we are doing the data load today and will upgrade the MYODBC to 3.51 before we do it. This will be a good test as the load takes 6 hours on the current version. Mary Stickney TAG-TMI Data Warehouse Programmer 402-474-7612 x 3099 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From

RE: timing

2003-02-01 Thread Mary Stickney
It doesn't run over the network. The reports are requested from a website , and a record is inserted into the ReportQueue. And then the reports are run local on the Production machine and then emailed to the recipient. At this time only 2 people order reports. Mary Stickney TAG-TMI

QUESTION----- EXCESSIVE RUN TIME

2002-08-09 Thread Mary Stickney
amp; sFromDate & _ " AND AdminCoverage.InitialPremiumDate <= " & sThruDate & _ " AND TaxID='" & FixSQLString(rs!taxid) & "'" & _ " ORDER BY AdminHierarchy.WritingAgentSlot,AdminCoverage.CoverageId," & _ " AdminCover

RE: select problem

2002-08-09 Thread Mary Stickney
select * from forms_data_recs where fdr_form_id='37' and ( fdr_ff_id ='190' and ( fdr_value like '%keith%' )) OR ( fdr_ff_id = '192' and (fdr_value like '%public%' )) order by fdr_date,fdr_id -Original Message- From: Keith Clay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 1

null

2002-08-14 Thread Mary Stickney
,RegionCode,FirstYearSales,SecondYearSales,ThirdyearSales,Perc entOfCases,producerid,distributioncode,PremiumsInForce) VALUES (080323288,'PIC' , '2000','2001', '2002', '3/30/2002','0B917','N0305',1,'7B',0,0,18.59,50,'0

RE: null

2002-08-14 Thread Mary Stickney
tring(sDistributionCode) & "'" Call SendToDwDb(sSql, rs5) -Original Message- From: Gerald Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 11:11 AM To: Mary Stickney Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: null That is really odd,

RE: RE: null

2002-08-15 Thread Mary Stickney
ok , but I have now just programmed around the error to meet my deadline... -Original Message- From: Victoria Reznichenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 6:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: null Mary, Wednesday, August 14, 2002, 7:23:47 PM,

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
It doesn't suport alot of differnt things it dosent have store procedures , dosent have a complete SQL command set... I am using it becasue I am being forced to... -Original Message- From: Elizabeth Bogner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 9:25 PM To: [EMA

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
I have been doing speed tests the same query ran on MYSQL took 45 minutes on MS-SQL it took 11 minutes.. yes you do get what you pay for -Original Message- From: Francisco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Mary Stickney; Elizabeth Bogner

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
What exactly is Trolling I find MYSQL to be slow , sorry if that doesn't met with your approval. -Original Message- From: Mark Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 9:15 AM To: Mary Stickney; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MySQL vs. Oracle (not

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
L PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 9:21 AM To: Mary Stickney; Elizabeth Bogner; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed) Hi Mary, I am not specially against or pro MySQL, Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle or any other database. Teams make their choices based on the projec

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 9:25 AM To: Mary Stickney; Francisco; Elizabeth Bogner; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed) Not to open a can of worms here, Mary, but I'd love to know exactly how you got those results, since they basically contradict every known benchm

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
I did crash the MYSQL server the other day... I am currently looping thru and getting the sales agent by agent. I tried to do the query for all 804 agents at one time and after an hour and a 1/2 and still not being done decided against doing it that way. next I decided I should have a table al

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
), KEY LobIdIndex (LOBID) ); -Original Message- From: Mark Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 9:15 AM To: Mary Stickney; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed) Mary Stickney wrote: > I have been doing speed tests the same query ran

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
I did send in my query the day I joined this list and the table structures. I just did again... -Original Message- From: Mark Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 9:47 AM To: Mary Stickney Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
Oracle (not speed) what query was it may I ask ? Tom - Original Message - From: "Mary Stickney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Francisco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Elizabeth Bogner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, Augu

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
speed is of the utmost importance , I can't have a client run a report and wait 2 days for it to finish. -Original Message- From: Aron Pilhofer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 9:46 AM To: Mary Stickney; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Francisco; Elizabeth Bogner; [

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
;ProductIdIndex;15;AdminCoverage.ProductId;1 1; ;tempsap;ALL;10019; -Original Message- From: Jocelyn Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 10:21 AM To: Mary Stickney; Francisco; Elizabeth Bogner; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
yes I do -Original Message- From: Jocelyn Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 10:37 AM To: Mary Stickney; Francisco; Elizabeth Bogner; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed) Do you have an index on AdminProducer.taxid and on

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
Mary Stickney; Mark Matthews; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed) Could you please send also tempsap ? Thanks and regards, Jocelyn - Original Message - From: "Mary Stickney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mark Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
aving problems with MySQL there is an entire list of people who are willing to offer support for free. Post your query and some table information and let's see if we can clear up your performance issues. John Griffin -Original Message----- From: Mary Stickney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Se

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
rosoft seems to always be plaiged with performance problems. Insulting someone will not help convert them to MySQL it will drive people away. Anyway enough of my rant... Serge. On Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:46:44 -0500 "Mark Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mary Stickney w

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
incidentaly... Primary keys cant not be made on most of these tables due to the fact that the farther back in time you got the more screwed up the data is... Fields have been added and they did not have the info to fill in the blanks... -Original Message- From: Mary Stickney [mailto

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
looks to me like I can only make indexes on fields that are not null... this one is not , not null -Original Message- From: Jocelyn Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 11:34 AM To: Mary Stickney; Mark Matthews; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MySQL vs

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
no I am using myisam it was just a limitation of DBTOOLS I am getting it done using alter table -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Van Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 1:06 PM To: Mary Stickney Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MySQL

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
it was a limitation of the DBTOOLS table manager... I am indexing right now using alter table... -Original Message- From: Dan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 1:08 PM To: Mary Stickney Cc: Jocelyn Fournier; Mark Matthews; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
back. -Original Message- From: Gelu Gogancea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 1:48 PM To: Mary Stickney; Elizabeth Bogner; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed) Hi Mary, My opinion: MySQL forums are open to every one to said about him MySQL pro

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
for reports only -Original Message- From: Gelu Gogancea [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 2:14 PM To: Mary Stickney; Elizabeth Bogner; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed) ...in this case...is very "sad". You use this query t

RE: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed)

2002-08-16 Thread Mary Stickney
ok fixed thoes every little bit helps... I hope. -Original Message- From: Jocelyn Fournier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 1:00 PM To: Mary Stickney; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MySQL vs. Oracle (not speed) I also noticed the field where you make the

RE: Query Question

2002-08-19 Thread Mary Stickney
E-mail) Subject: RE: Query Question I suppose I should have specified that I would not be able to filter by Data1 > -Original Message- > From: Mary Stickney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 11:52 AM > To: Luc Foisy > Subject: RE: Query Question

RE: help with a query

2002-08-21 Thread Mary Stickney
select hostid,patch.patchnumber from host left join patch on host.hostid = patch.hostid where patchnumber isnull -Original Message- From: Ajay Patel - SunService [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 2:27 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: help with a query I am

RE: SQL - Update problem

2002-08-28 Thread Mary Stickney
you cant update from is NOT supported -Original Message- From: Jakub Mach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:15 AM To: Mysql Subject: SQL - Update problem Hi, how can I do sql command like this: update sekce set pocet = count(*) from odkaz where od

RE: MS Access and mySQL

2002-08-28 Thread Mary Stickney
the join syntax is what is differnt between Access and MYSQL. in MS-SQL = indexs will be used on tables mentioned in the JOIN clause and they will not in MYSQL -Original Message- From: Nicholas Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:40 AM To: [EMAIL PROTEC

RE: JAMES KADEH mysql !

2002-08-28 Thread Mary Stickney
I reported him already... to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] and several others.. also wrote back and asked if he thought I was a complete idiot... -Original Message- From: John Wards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: MS Access and mySQL

2002-08-28 Thread Mary Stickney
gentid (WritingAgentId), KEY writingagentslot (WritingAgentSlot) ); -Original Message- From: Mark Matthews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:11 AM To: Mary Stickney Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: MS Access and myS

RE: JAMES KADEH mysql !

2002-08-28 Thread Mary Stickney
HE ALREADY DID FROM PREVIOUS EMAILS TO MY ACCOUNT... I HAVE A WEB PAGE AND THEY ARE MINING EMAIL ADDRESSES.. DUH SAME BACK AT YOU -Original Message- From: Kenneth Hylton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 11:29 AM To: 'Mary Stickney'; John War

RE: like problem

2002-08-29 Thread Mary Stickney
that would be because b.name is inside the ' ' and it is taken as a constant. -Original Message- From: Jorge Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: like problem i need this consult select a.name from table1 a, table

RE: like problem

2002-08-29 Thread Mary Stickney
ok try this select a.name from table1 a, table2 b where a.name like '%'+ b.name + '%'; -Original Message- From: Jorge Martinez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:48 AM To: Mary Stickney; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: like problem ye

RE: DATES and WHERE

2002-08-29 Thread Mary Stickney
Short answer YES you have to have them why because 2002-08-29 = 1965 -Original Message- From: Johnny Withers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: DATES and WHERE I'm a bit confused here.. dates are not my strong point.. I