Re: HELP WITH A DATE QUERY USING 4.0.17

2005-04-18 Thread John Thorpe
I'm not sure if there is a built-in, but what I usually do for similar things is to use general purpose table to force iteration. E.g. create a table called ITERATE with one column, x, and populate with values 0,1,2,3,4,... -- in your case up to 10 -- and index the column. Then it's easy - I only s

Innodb logfiles timestamp question

2004-03-11 Thread John Thorpe
Hi, I am running 4.0.4 using innodb tables on a linux box. My innodb config is innodb_data_file_path = ibdata1:1800M;ibdata2:1800M;...ibdata10:1800M set-variable = innodb_mirrored_log_groups=1 set-variable = innodb_log_files_in_group=3 set-variable = innodb_log_file_size=500M set-variable = innod

Re: Innodb logfiles timestamp question

2004-03-19 Thread John Thorpe
Yes that makes sense, thanks Heikki. I monitored the ib_logfiles some more and see the cycling between pairs logfile0+logfile1 and logfile0+logfile2. Heikki Tuuri wrote: John, - Original Message - From: "John Thorpe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I am running 4.0.4 using innodb t

Re: Drop all keys / indexes on a table?

2004-03-30 Thread John Thorpe
I've been using comand line piping through awk to handle mass tables modifications and listings. E.g. in your case something like the following would hit every index, except the primary keys, in table tablename in the test database. echo "show index from tablename" | | mysql -uuser -ppswd test | aw

Re: Record lag functionality in MySQL?

2004-03-31 Thread John Thorpe
If I'm reading this correctly, a self-join might work if you have a primary key defined: select t1.a as a1 ,t1.b as b1 ,t1.c as c1 ,t2.a as d1 from thetable as t1 ,thetable as t2 where t2.primaryid = t1.primaryid+1 John David L. Van Brunt, Ph.D. wrote: I have a table of data... A1 B1 C1 A2 B2 C

Re: Multiple Mysqld Stability and maintanability

2004-05-11 Thread John Thorpe
We have been running two 3.23.47 and one 4.0.4 (innodb) on a single machine the past 2 years. We haven't had stability or any ongoing problems. If something happens to one instance, it has not affected any other. The main issue is resource allocation. Also be sure that the different instances do

Re: Interesting Challenge

2002-11-04 Thread John Thorpe
I know this is not elegant, but have have you tried using a temporary table? It adds up your function column correctly. There was an example of this earlier today from Oyekanmi - "Re: getting around a subselect", http://lists.mysql.com/cgi-ez/ezmlm-cgi?1:mss:123911:200211:onbajmklkgifeckohcpa