We have a table with 254 columns in it. 80% of the time, a very small
subset of these columns are queried. The other columns are rarely, if
ever, queried. (But they could be at any time, so we do need to
maintain them.). Would I expect to get a marked performance boost if I
split my table up into 2
Hi,
You could split the table into two and can avoid code changes by creating a
view which matches what code is looking for.
I think loading few fields vs 254 into memory will make a difference but if
your select statement only have specific fields you want and not the whole
row (and also given t
Hi Larry,
On May 14, 2014, at 5:05 AM, Larry Martell wrote:
> We have a table with 254 columns in it. 80% of the time, a very small
> subset of these columns are queried. The other columns are rarely, if
> ever, queried. (But they could be at any time, so we do need to
> maintain them.). Would I
OK, put away the flamethrowers, I KNOW it's dumb.
I've been asked for the upteenth time is this possible and if so under what
conditions?
So I pose the question to the community, is it? Under what conditions? Is it
reliable or not?
Are there authoritative references to support the answers?
As far as I know, the only way this is possible is if your entire
database is formatted as MyISAM. In that case, multiple MySQL
processes, each started with external-locking enabled, may safely
share a data folder. The contention will almost certainly kill you as
far as performance goes.. and i
Hello Bruce,
On 5/14/2014 2:11 PM, Bruce Ferrell wrote:
OK, put away the flamethrowers, I KNOW it's dumb.
I've been asked for the upteenth time is this possible and if so under
what conditions?
So I pose the question to the community, is it? Under what conditions?
Is it reliable or not?
Are t
On 5/14/2014 3:45 PM, shawn l.green wrote:
Hello Bruce,
On 5/14/2014 2:11 PM, Bruce Ferrell wrote:
OK, put away the flamethrowers, I KNOW it's dumb.
I've been asked for the upteenth time is this possible and if so under
what conditions?
So I pose the question to the community, is it? Under