008 13:38:37 -0700
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: mysql@lists.mysql.com
> Subject: recommended high availability setups
>
> What's the recommended method for high-availability setups?
>
> I've currently got a master-master replication setup that I'm testing
&g
In the last episode (Aug 28), Bryan Irvine said:
> I saw that. That's what initially got me thinking that I might need
> to look elsewhere for a different HA solution.
>
> The biggest thing is that the DB is for a hosting company. This
> company could add databases for their clients upon a reque
I saw that. That's what initially got me thinking that I might need
to look elsewhere for a different HA solution.
The biggest thing is that the DB is for a hosting company. This
company could add databases for their clients upon a request and at
any point during the day. The current master-mas
I saw that. That's what initially got me thinking that I might need
to look elsewhere for a different HA solution.
The biggest thing is that the DB is for a hosting company. This
company could add databases for their clients upon a request and at
any point during the day. The current master-mas
Hello,
It isn't without its pros and cons (just like any other HA solution), but you
might want to check out DRBD.
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/faqs-mysql-drbd-heartbeat.html
-- Jimmy
Bryan Irvine wrote:
What's the recommended method for high-availability setups?
I've currently go
What's the recommended method for high-availability setups?
I've currently got a master-master replication setup that I'm testing
but it doesn't quite seem as complete a solution as I had pictured.
When a failed server comes back online you still have to manually add
it based off of the line numb
