Re: fulltext search speed issue with SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS

2003-12-15 Thread tk
Hello, > > Could one not store the total while using the > index > > and use "select FOUND_ROWS()" without > > SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS to retrieve the total? > > Yes, it could. > It is the optimization that wasn't implemented yet. > (but it's in the TODO) Once again, thanks for the response. Could

Re: fulltext search speed issue with SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS

2003-12-05 Thread Sergei Golubchik
Hi! On Dec 05, tk wrote: > Hello Sergei, Gunnar, and others, > > thank you for your quick responses. > One little mystery remains: > > Why does one need to read all the row data (with > SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS) to get the total number of > results when using a limit? > > When the index is used to

Re: fulltext search speed issue with SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS

2003-12-05 Thread tk
Hello Sergei, Gunnar, and others, thank you for your quick responses. One little mystery remains: Why does one need to read all the row data (with SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS) to get the total number of results when using a limit? When the index is used to find relevant rows and sort the results, the c

RE: fulltext search speed issue with SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS

2003-12-05 Thread Boehn, Gunnar von
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2003 16:13 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: fulltext search speed issue with SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS > > > I have some_table with 100,000 rows and with an > average of 500 words in some_column of each row. When

Re: fulltext search speed issue with SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS

2003-12-05 Thread Sergei Golubchik
Hi! On Dec 04, tk wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks for the response. > There is one thing that is not clear however. > > Regardless of whether or not I perform the fulltext > search with or without the SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS > keyword, the results that I get are exactly the same. > > Also, the notion

Re: fulltext search speed issue with SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS

2003-12-04 Thread tk
ns any faster. :-) > > > Hope that helps. > > > Matt > > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:13 AM > Subject: fulltext search speed issue with > SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS > > > >

Re: fulltext search speed issue with SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS

2003-12-04 Thread Matt W
You might want to try your fulltext search IN BOOLEAN MODE to see if that runs any faster. :-) Hope that helps. Matt - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 9:13 AM Subject: fulltext search speed issue with SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS > I h

fulltext search speed issue with SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS

2003-12-04 Thread wassuuuub
I have some_table with 100,000 rows and with an average of 500 words in some_column of each row. When i do a fulltext search on this table using a query such as the following, all of my results are under 0.1 seconds: SELECT something FROM some_table WHERE MATCH (some_column) AGAINST ('some_search_