true) // don't bother rolling it back if ctor fails
{
// Set the transaction isolation level and scope as the user wishes
Query q(conn_.query("SET "));
if (scope == session) q << "SESSION ";
if (scope ==
Hi Yang,
On Mar 26, 2010, at 4:28 PM, Yang Zhang wrote:
I've noticed that Innodb seems to exhibit true serializability for the
serializable transaction isolation level. Does this mean it implements
predicate locking?
Kinda, but not exactly. In serializable, all reads will use shared
I've noticed that Innodb seems to exhibit true serializability for the
serializable transaction isolation level. Does this mean it implements
predicate locking? Also out of curiosity, is it possible to set a
snapshot isolation transaction isolation level (is Innodb implemented
using MVCC)? T
Apologies for a late reply.
1) The query that tries to insert the invalid entry into Table2 fails.
Therefore, if you have 3 separate queries as in the first case, the
last one fails, but the first 2 are successful. In the second case,
they're all in one query, and if one fails, they all fail.
F
Hi.
I have a few questions regarding the transaction levels in mysql 5.0.20
using InnoDB tables.
we are trying to populate two tables in the two following ways, we thought
that they would be equivalent, apparently they are not.
have a look at the following (questions last).
FIRST METHOD:
=
,
not the gap before it. So, parallel INSERTs are possible and they cause
a 'duplicate' error.
> In the transaction isolation level,Database send some "duplicate entry"
> message to me.
> Why?
>
>
In the transaction isolation level,Database send some "duplicate entry"
message to me.
Why?
_
与联机的朋友进行交流，请使用 MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com/cn
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists
ying that SET SESSION TRANSACTION
ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED would be ignored for MyISAM tables. I may
open an official support call to verify.
> If you're using a newer version of our JDBC driver (3.1.x), you can
> always add "useLocalSessionState=true" to avoid having to d
at the query log, I'm now getting...
>
> SHOW VARIABLES
>
> ...once per connection
>
> followed by...
> SET SESSION TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED
>
> -> followed by one or more...
> ^ SELECT
> ^
> ^ followed by...
&
lowed by...
SET SESSION TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED
-> followed by one or more...
^ SELECT
^
^ followed by...
^ SET autocommit=1
^ SET SESSION TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED
^
<- this pattern repeats until the final Quit for the connection.
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:26:34PM -0700, Bill Todd wrote:
> What transaction isolation level(s) does BDB support? I can't find any
> information on BDB transactions section 7.6 of the manual.
BDB only does READ COMMITTED.
Jeremy
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Lin
What transaction isolation level(s) does BDB support? I can't find any
information on BDB transactions section 7.6 of the manual.
Thanks,
Bill
--
MySQL General Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/mysql
To unsubscribe:http://lists.mysql.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
InnoDB seems to delaying writes for too long.
After adding or deleting records in a table, viewing
the results of a query from another application on the
same workstation and other workstations does not
reflect the changes.
It is as though another connections are still being
presented with old sn
should happen?
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong, but using the READ_COMMITTED
> transaction isolation level, I should be achieving what I want, right?
> I used the following syntax to ensure that the read_committed level
> (which is apparently default to Mysql) is enforced:
>
g the READ_COMMITTED
transaction isolation level, I should be achieving what I want, right?
I used the following syntax to ensure that the read_committed level
(which is apparently default to Mysql) is enforced:
set global transaction isolation level read_commited;
I tried using MySQL v4 beta, but same
-Jianliang
-Original Message-
From: Heikki Tuuri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 2002?10?8? 9:56
To: Jianliang Zhao; Mark Matthews
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: transaction isolation level
Jianliang,
I tested that with two mysql clients, and it appeared to work ok. Check with
S
--+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
mysql>
- Original Message -
From: "Jianliang Zhao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Mark Matthews"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 08,
i Tuuri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 2002?10?8? 0:22
To: Mark Matthews
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: transaction isolation level
Hi!
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002
Hi!
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Matthews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.mysql
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:07 AM
Subject: Re: transaction isolation level
> Jianliang Zhao wrote:
...
> >>I am connecting to MySql 3.23(innodb) w
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 2002?10?7? 17:36
>To: Jianliang Zhao
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: transaction isolation level
>
>
>On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 05:30:57PM -0700, Jianliang Zhao wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I am connecting to MySql 3.23(inn
ao
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: transaction isolation level
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 05:30:57PM -0700, Jianliang Zhao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am connecting to MySql 3.23(innodb) with
> mysql-connector-java-2.0.14-bin.jar. I set the global transaction
> isolation level to READ C
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 05:30:57PM -0700, Jianliang Zhao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am connecting to MySql 3.23(innodb) with
> mysql-connector-java-2.0.14-bin.jar. I set the global transaction
> isolation level to READ COMMITTED. However, I still couldn't see the
> committed chan
Hi,
I am connecting to MySql 3.23(innodb) with mysql-connector-java-2.0.14-bin.jar. I set
the global transaction isolation level to READ COMMITTED. However, I still couldn't
see the committed changes through JDBC client. Does anyone know about this issue?
Thanks,
Jian
-versioning, so be sure to read carefully
Ki Mien wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We need to prevent Dirty Reading.
>
> How can we perform transaction isolation in mySQL? Are the following:
>TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE, TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ, TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED,
>TRANSAC
Hi all,
We need to prevent Dirty Reading.
How can we perform transaction isolation in mySQL? Are the following:
TRANSACTION_SERIALIZABLE, TRANSACTION_REPEATABLE_READ, TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED,
TRANSACTION_READ_UNCOMMITTED, TRANSACTION_NONE supported by MySQL? Or has anyone tried
any other
Jeremy,
look at http://www.innodb.com/ibman.html and http://www.innodb.com/todo.html
about InnoDB isolation levels.
Currently, SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL does not have any effect on
MyISAM, BDB, or InnoDB.
The standard isolation level of InnoDB is REPEATABLE READ (you can also call
that
the transaction-isolation to
READ_UNCOMMITTED (1)without any success, either from command-line, or inside
the SQL code.transaction-isolation parameter is available since version
3.23.36, butit does not seem to work with BDB tables !The isolation
level (returned by JDBC driver) seems to be
27 matches
Mail list logo
