> I've used a rule of thumb that I was told ages ago when working on other
> databases that inserting records into a non-indexed table is faster
> generally than inserting records into an identical but indexed table.
Makes sense to me, since it has to update the indexes in the latter case.
Howeve
I've used a rule of thumb that I was told ages ago when working on other
databases that inserting records into a non-indexed table is faster
generally than inserting records into an identical but indexed table.
I realize that this statement is probably an antiquated guideline.and
I'd like to
