Re: Solved (Re: 4.0.2 Replication still buggy...)

2002-05-16 Thread Michael Widenius
Hi! > "Sasha" == Sasha Pachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sasha> On Wednesday 01 May 2002 11:34 pm, Jeremy Zawodny wrote: >> After even more tracking stuff down, I managed to isolate it to a >> change made in MySQL 4.0.1. ?The query in question was doing: >> >> ? INSERT INTO ... SELECT ...

Re: Solved (Re: 4.0.2 Replication still buggy...)

2002-05-03 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:46:42AM -0600, Sasha Pachev wrote: > On Wednesday 01 May 2002 11:34 pm, Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > > After even more tracking stuff down, I managed to isolate it to a > > change made in MySQL 4.0.1. ?The query in question was doing: > > > > ? INSERT INTO ... SELECT ... > >

Re: Solved (Re: 4.0.2 Replication still buggy...)

2002-05-03 Thread Sasha Pachev
On Wednesday 01 May 2002 11:34 pm, Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > After even more tracking stuff down, I managed to isolate it to a > change made in MySQL 4.0.1. ?The query in question was doing: > > ? INSERT INTO ... SELECT ... > > rather than > > ? INSERT IGNORE INTO ... SELECT ... > > MySQL 3.23.x

Solved (Re: 4.0.2 Replication still buggy...)

2002-05-02 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
1On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 09:11:52AM -0700, Jeremy Zawodny wrote: > I started it up and it ran for about a day before it ran into a > duplicate key error. The 3.23.47 slave hasn't hit the duplicate key > error, nor have any of our other slaves. So it is a 4.0.2 bug of > some sort. This has been