Great. That is the assumption under which I have been working. I was
really hoping for confirmation. I appreciate it! Thanks for
responding.
Thanks,
Paul
Chris Comparini wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 16:31, Paul J. Boyes wrote:
Hello,
I have a fairly sizeable aggregate tabl
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 16:31, Paul J. Boyes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a fairly sizeable aggregate table that is built from a large
> amount of data that is going to receive a large volume of reads. I am
> looking at possibly using the rename to swap the table out regularly
> with an updated on
Hello,
I have a fairly sizeable aggregate table that is built from a large
amount of data that is going to receive a large volume of reads. I am
looking at possibly using the rename to swap the table out regularly
with an updated one. Is this a viable solution for a table that
experiences a l
