Re: client library no longer LGPL licensing

2002-10-02 Thread David Axmark
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 01:05, Ken Menzel wrote: > > > Does this also apply to non-open-source but free applications? For > > example, we give away Escapade for free - always have, always will, > > at least for the minimal version of the product. If we develop a > > non-free version of Escapade t

RE: client library no longer LGPL licensing

2002-10-02 Thread David Axmark
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 00:35, Ed Carp wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > The change is made to avoid lots of discussions about when the GPL > > is effective. Basically we follow the same rules as we always have > > about when we want people to pay us for a commercial li

Re: client library no longer LGPL licensing

2002-09-25 Thread Ken Menzel
> Does this also apply to non-open-source but free applications? For > example, we give away Escapade for free - always have, always will, > at least for the minimal version of the product. If we develop a > non-free version of Escapade that uses mysqlclient, what happens > then? We also dist

RE: client library no longer LGPL licensing

2002-09-25 Thread Ed Carp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > The change is made to avoid lots of discussions about when the GPL > is effective. Basically we follow the same rules as we always have > about when we want people to pay us for a commercial license but > now we have a better legal ground to base it

Re: client library no longer LGPL licensing

2002-09-25 Thread David Axmark
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 23:05, Ken Menzel wrote: > Hi Everyone, >I don't know if it makes a difference to anyone, but mysql client > libraries are no longer LGPL. see > http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Copyright.html. (original licenses can be > found in old source tar files documentation). I think t