RE: Undefined symbols compiling against 4.1.7 on Solaris 2.8

2004-11-04 Thread Dathan Vance Pattishall
Are you linking against an old library binary? DVP Dathan Vance Pattishall http://www.friendster.com > -Original Message- > From: V. M. Brasseur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004 10:19 AM > To: MySQL Listserv > Subject: Undefined symbols compiling ag

Re: Undefined symbols compiling against 4.1.7 on Solaris 2.8

2004-11-03 Thread V. M. Brasseur
On a whim, I removed the --disable-shared from the configure options and was greeted by a lot of unresolved symbols from libz.a and this pleasant message: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Google search says to use GNU

Re: Undefined symbols compiling against 4.1.7 on Solaris 2.8

2004-11-03 Thread V. M. Brasseur
Unfortunately, the --disable-shared is intentional. For various reasons, our programs use static libraries whenever possible rather than dynamically linking. Do you think the LDFLAGS and/or --enable-libgcc still help for static libraries? Many thanks for your help so far, --V Ken Menzel wrote