Re: status variables Table_Locks_*

2007-04-30 Thread Baron Schwartz
Power, Paul C. wrote: Table_Locks_Immediate and Table_Locks_waited. What does MySQL do exactly to get those values? Can it be determined what locks had to wait, and why? -Paul As far as I know, no. You should probably ask someone who really knows, but to my limited understanding, these l

Re: Status

2006-08-15 Thread Diogo Resende
noup On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 11:24 +0330, mysql@lists.mysql.com wrote: > abuse? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Status of bugs

2003-12-15 Thread miguel solorzano
At 11:34 15/12/2003 -0800, Jim Gallagher wrote: Hi, Hello, Last month I posted here a question (with no responses) about a problem I am having with myisamchk ("myisamchk Error 22 WinServer 2003 Large table"). My problem seems to be identical to that described here: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.ph

Re: "Status" shows wrong version number for server after upgrade

2003-11-22 Thread Paul DuBois
At 11:23 -0500 11/21/03, Mark Marshall wrote: Got it. mysqladmin version showed the 4.0.4 version. The Find is what clued me in. It did indeed find two mysqld executables. One in /usr/local/share/mysql/... and the other in /usr/local/mysql/share/mysql/... I copied the right one over the wrong

Re: "Status" shows wrong version number for server after upgrade

2003-11-21 Thread Mark Marshall
Got it. mysqladmin version showed the 4.0.4 version. The Find is what clued me in. It did indeed find two mysqld executables. One in /usr/local/share/mysql/... and the other in /usr/local/mysql/share/mysql/... I copied the right one over the wrong one and after cleaning up a couple of erro

Re: "Status" shows wrong version number for server after upgrade

2003-11-21 Thread Thomas Spahni
Mark, what's the output of shell> mysqladmin version It appears that you still have a version of 4.0.4-beta running. Try shell> find /usr /sbin /bin -name mysqld to see whether there is more than one copy of mysqld hanging around. Regards, Thomas Spahni On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Mark Marshall w

Re: Status question about Mysql

2002-08-20 Thread Neil Mansilla
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Matt Heaton wrote: > Hi, I am running 3.23.49 and had a quick question I hope someone can answer. > 70% of the time my sql server is doing just fine. I have 4 GIGs of memory, > and a 1.33 Ghz processor.I am running Redhat 7.3 with a 2.4.19 kernel. > > 70% of the time m

Re: status of 4.0

2002-04-26 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 09:54:37AM -0400, Brian Smith wrote: > I can't seem to find any real currect new about a stable Mysql 4.0 > release, anyone know more about this? The 4.0.x code is feeling pretty good with a few exceptions: full-text search (a few folks have encountered bugs), and replica

Re: Status of InnoDB support.

2002-03-21 Thread Heikki Tuuri
Gabriel, MySQL-Max-3.23 is now officially stable both in the opinion of MySQL AB and Innobase Oy. It is listed as stable both in the MySQL online manual and on the MySQL AB website front page. The reason for separate MySQL-3.23 and MySQL-Max-3.23 is commercial: there are different support and em