Baron Schwartz wrote:
Chris Hemmings wrote:
Chris Hemmings wrote:
Baron Schwartz wrote:
Hi Chris,
Chris Hemmings wrote:
Dan Buettner wrote:
Chris, a couple of thoughts -
First, your index on the section is doing you no good (at this
time) since
all the values are the same. You may alread
The results of an EXPLAIN have a lot to do with the data which is
actually on the system. In this case, it seems to hinge on the
distribution of your 'price' attribute.. how many records on your
system? and what is the general distribution of the price attribute?
(how many distinct values)
On
Chris Hemmings wrote:
Chris Hemmings wrote:
Baron Schwartz wrote:
Hi Chris,
Chris Hemmings wrote:
Dan Buettner wrote:
Chris, a couple of thoughts -
First, your index on the section is doing you no good (at this
time) since
all the values are the same. You may already know that, but
thoug
Chris Hemmings wrote:
Baron Schwartz wrote:
Hi Chris,
Chris Hemmings wrote:
Dan Buettner wrote:
Chris, a couple of thoughts -
First, your index on the section is doing you no good (at this time)
since
all the values are the same. You may already know that, but thought
I'd
mention it.
Se
Baron Schwartz wrote:
Hi Chris,
Chris Hemmings wrote:
Dan Buettner wrote:
Chris, a couple of thoughts -
First, your index on the section is doing you no good (at this time)
since
all the values are the same. You may already know that, but thought I'd
mention it.
Second, my theory on why q
Hi Chris,
Chris Hemmings wrote:
Dan Buettner wrote:
Chris, a couple of thoughts -
First, your index on the section is doing you no good (at this time)
since
all the values are the same. You may already know that, but thought I'd
mention it.
Second, my theory on why query #1 is faster - if
Dan Buettner wrote:
Chris, a couple of thoughts -
First, your index on the section is doing you no good (at this time) since
all the values are the same. You may already know that, but thought I'd
mention it.
Second, my theory on why query #1 is faster - if all your prices range from
1 up, and
Chris, a couple of thoughts -
First, your index on the section is doing you no good (at this time) since
all the values are the same. You may already know that, but thought I'd
mention it.
Second, my theory on why query #1 is faster - if all your prices range from
1 up, and you're querying for p
Jeremy Cole wrote:
Hi Chris,
Chris Hemmings wrote:
Hello,
I have a table, currently holding 128,978 rows... In this table, I
have a section column (int) and a price column (int). Every row has
a section of 1 currently, every row has a price, ranging from 1 to
10,000.
I have an index on
Hi Chris,
Chris Hemmings wrote:
Hello,
I have a table, currently holding 128,978 rows... In this table, I have a
section column (int) and a price column (int). Every row has a section of 1
currently, every row has a price, ranging from 1 to 10,000.
I have an index on both columns separate
10 matches
Mail list logo