Gabriel,
- Original Message -
From: "Gabriel Ricard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.myodbc
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 6:46 PM
Subject: InnoDB on Raw partitions in OSX (was Re: MySQL/InnoDB-4.0.16 is
released + sneak peek of 4.1.1)
> On Monday, O
On Monday, October 27, 2003, at 07:45 AM, Chris Nolan wrote:
2. I personally use ReiserFS for all of my stuff, most of which is
based upon InnoDB. One thing you have to remember is that InnoDB
treats the space inside the tablespace as a Berkeley Fast
Filesystem-style space, using the underlayin
ournaled file system extra overhead? If so, is
Raw significantly more efficient? How does this choice effect backup
soultion?
thanks, Jon
- Original Message -
From: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:55 PM
Sub
Hancock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Vastaanottaja: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Lähetetty: Monday, October 27, 2003 10:42 AM
> > Aihe: Re: MySQL/InnoDB-4.0.16 is released + sneak peek of 4.1.1
> >
> >
> > > Heikki,
> >
more efficient? How does this choice effect backup
soultion?
thanks, Jon
> - Original Message -
> From: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:55 PM
> Subject: Re: MySQL/InnoDB-4.0.16 is rele
Hi Heikki,
> > As you know - I'm a transaction zealot :-)
> >
> > Is there a way to get a signal back to the client when a
> > transaction has started?
>
> what do you mean? If you have AUTOCOMMIT=0, then every SELECT, INSERT,
> UPDATE, DELETE starts a new active transaction.
Aha - that's good, I
Martijn,
- Original Message -
From: ""Martijn Tonies"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mailing.database.myodbc
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: MySQL/InnoDB-4.0.16 is released + sneak peek of 4.1.1
> Hi Heikki,
>
> As you know -
Hi Chris,
> I'm not the almighty Heikki, but I might be able to fill you in to some
> extent.
:-)
> Your first and third questions I cannot answer with certainty, but I'm
> pretty
> sure the answer is "no". Regarding the first one, I'm not too sure as to
> why you'd need
> it. Looking at the out
CTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: MySQL/InnoDB-4.0.16 is released + sneak peek of 4.1.1
> Eduardo,
>
> - Alkuperäinen viesti -
> Lähettäjä: "Eduardo D Piovesam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Vastaanottaja: "
Hi!
I'm not the almighty Heikki, but I might be able to fill you in to some
extent.
Your first and third questions I cannot answer with certainty, but I'm
pretty
sure the answer is "no". Regarding the first one, I'm not too sure as to
why you'd need
it. Looking at the output of SHOW VARIABLES
Eduardo,
- Alkuperäinen viesti -
Lähettäjä: "Eduardo D Piovesam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lähetetty: Friday, October 24, 2003 6:17 PM
Aihe: Re: MySQL/InnoDB-4.0.16 is released + sneak
00MB each or
- Just one table2.ibd with 600MB or 1GB?
Thanks again,
Eduardo
- Original Message -
From: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: MySQL/InnoDB-4.0.16 is released + sneak peek of 4.1.1
Hi Heikki,
As you know - I'm a transaction zealot :-)
Is there a way to get a signal back to the client when a
transaction has started? Or perhaps something like
@@trancount in MSSQL?
Is there a way to turn ON/OFF auto-commit?
And, are metadata operations under transaction control?
With regar
com
InnoDB - transactions, row level locking, and foreign keys for MySQL
InnoDB Hot Backup - hot backup tool for InnoDB which also backs up MyISAM
tables
..
From: "Eduardo D Piovesam" ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Re: MySQL/InnoDB-4.0.16 is released + sneak peek
, and foreign keys for MySQL
InnoDB Hot Backup - hot backup tool for InnoDB which also backs up MyISAM
tables
From: Chris Nolan ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Re: MySQL/InnoDB-4.0.16 is released + sneak peek of 4.1.1
View this article only
Newsgroups: mailing.database.myodbc
Date: 2003-
(Sorry for the last email, it's not complete).
Hello Heikki,
Sorry, but I didn't understand the concept of tablespace applied. It's
different from Oracle, right?
AFAIK, tablespace is utilized to logically group "tables" into one (or more)
files.
And to group "indexes" into another files...
But
Hello Heikki,
I didn't understand the concept of tablespaces utilized,
- Original Message -
From: "Heikki Tuuri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 12:00 PM
Subject: MySQL/InnoDB-4.0.16 is released + sneak peek of 4.1.1
>
Hello Heikki!!!
Multiple table spaces eh? Funky! Of course, as you've no doubt become
aware, I am one of these annoying
people that has many questions to ask the list the moment something like
this comes along! Please feel
free to ignore these questions though, as we're all hanging out for 4.1.1
18 matches
Mail list logo
