On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 13:02 +0700, Ady Wicaksono wrote:
> On 10/9/06, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 11:42 +0700, Ady Wicaksono wrote:
> > > Is your MSSQL data structure contain such foreign key?
> > >
> > > If yes, my isam is not suitable for you
> >
> > Actually,
On 10/9/06, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 11:42 +0700, Ady Wicaksono wrote:
> Is your MSSQL data structure contain such foreign key?
>
> If yes, my isam is not suitable for you
Actually, you know what? I don't really know.
How does one go about checking?
Dump it
On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 11:42 +0700, Ady Wicaksono wrote:
> Is your MSSQL data structure contain such foreign key?
>
> If yes, my isam is not suitable for you
Actually, you know what? I don't really know.
How does one go about checking?
>
> Others... for overall, i prefer innodb :)
I know it's t
Is your MSSQL data structure contain such foreign key?
If yes, my isam is not suitable for you
Others... for overall, i prefer innodb :)
On 10/8/06, Ow Mun Heng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm just curious as to which would have better performance for my needs.
backend is a MSSQL server and I